ilovebush&blair
Well-Known Member
anyone got any links for good mail order b&w processing? good quality service prefered but value for money also important. let me know XD
Wha? I used to develop B&W film and print from negs in a darkroom with no running water. Just how many films are you talking? I really do not understand.
After you have finished with the developer and the fix you need to wash the film in the dev tank for at least an hour.
How did you do it? go check your negs and prints, are they all brown now?
one of my friends recomended me this place:
http://www.peak-imaging.com/
which i think i might use, took some films to jessops and they take 3 weeks which is way to long.
Just dug out some prints I did in 1986. They're fine.After you have finished with the developer and the fix you need to wash the film in the dev tank for at least an hour.
How did you do it? go check your negs and prints, are they all brown now?
I haven't looked at my negs, They're in a box in the loft, but anyway I can't remember which I developed myself, and which I didn't. I did all my own prints though.
i think some ilford b+w films come with processing included in the cost.
I know exactly how to do, done it many times as ive studied photography at college and university.
But im on a water meter so i cant do it myself, there is no way i can afford to have water running for hours at a time. i pretty much have everything to do it. but the water is the only problem.
You forgot the stop bath.After you have finished with the developer and the fix...
Not true. It's more convenient to just let the water run through the tank in a constant stream, but the water is barely agitated over the surface of the film: It just flows over it. Inversion is more forceful, which is why you need less time at it.you need to wash the film in the dev tank for at least an hour.
I've got negs from the 70s and 80s that were washed using the inversion process (a process that Ilford still recommend for home development of their films, btw), that are fine and dandy. The only negs that were home developed that have gone wonky were some that used an old pre-c41 colour process that had about 8 different steps.How did you do it? go check your negs and prints, are they all brown now?
Precisely. The method itself is older than Ilford films. It's the same wash method Walter Zapp recommended for washing Minox sub-miniature films, and bear in mind that Zapp didn't invent the Minox as a "spy camera", but as a portable camera for archiving documents onto film. He wouldn't have approved a method that didn't give as much permanence as possible.since i returned to developing a couple of years back i've just filled and emptied the tank 3 times with different no.s of inversions. google the ilford wash method, it's pretty widely followed.
You forgot the stop bath.
Not true. It's more convenient to just let the water run through the tank in a constant stream, but the water is barely agitated over the surface of the film: It just flows over it. Inversion is more forceful, which is why you need less time at it.
I've got negs from the 70s and 80s that were washed using the inversion process (a process that Ilford still recommend for home development of their films, btw), that are fine and dandy. The only negs that were home developed that have gone wonky were some that used an old pre-c41 colour process that had about 8 different steps.