Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Air source heat pumps

It warms the cold air from the window stopping cold 'drafts'.
That's my understanding, as well. It's not the most efficient way to heat a room, but it does significantly reduce draughts that make the room feel colder than it is.
 
It warms the cold air from the window stopping cold 'drafts'.

Doubling or tripling radiators requires the pipes altering to them with possible extra holes needed in floors and carpets. :(
Gosh. An extra hole. Oh my god people couldn't tolerate that.

I will report back on the chaos caused by my fatter radiators in due course.
 
Gosh. An extra hole. Oh my god people couldn't tolerate that.

I will report back on the chaos caused by my fatter radiators in due course.
It's OK until that extra hole ends up having to be made in a solid (eg concrete) floor!

I was watching a YouTube video recently which suggested that, if you wanted to know how your existing system would cope with a heat pump, you should turn your boiler output temperature down to 50C, which implies that that's probably a typical flow temperature for a heat pump. I do think that there's a lot of rather black-and-white stuff going on around heat pumps, and that the truth lies somewhere in the middle, but I do also suspect that, like so many energy-saving initiatives in the past (double glazing, cavity wall infill, loft insulation, solar PV, etc) this one has also morphed into a bit of a "jobs for the boys" thing, with suppliers overselling the benefits just to get their foot in the door and their hands on the grant money, which does nothing to add credibility to the process.
 
double glazing does stand out on its own though with 25+ year repayment times and usually much better and cheaper energy saving measures.
 
It's OK until that extra hole ends up having to be made in a solid (eg concrete) floor!

I was watching a YouTube video recently which suggested that, if you wanted to know how your existing system would cope with a heat pump, you should turn your boiler output temperature down to 50C, which implies that that's probably a typical flow temperature for a heat pump. I do think that there's a lot of rather black-and-white stuff going on around heat pumps, and that the truth lies somewhere in the middle, but I do also suspect that, like so many energy-saving initiatives in the past (double glazing, cavity wall infill, loft insulation, solar PV, etc) this one has also morphed into a bit of a "jobs for the boys" thing, with suppliers overselling the benefits just to get their foot in the door and their hands on the grant money, which does nothing to add credibility to the process.
I think the installation costs themselves are a piss-take. I reiterate that there's no reason why a heat pump install should on average be triple what a gas boiler would cost. It's just milking the government subsidy.

Heat pumps still have some room to get better, whereas gas boilers are pretty much as good as they can be. So in another 5-10 years when costs come down it will be an absolute no-brainer.

I've got my boiler set to 62C and it still works quite comfortably. I'm tempted to see how low it can go before I start getting annoyed at cold feet.
 
Interesting - so relatively poor transfer of heat from radiator to room?
Despite the name, the radiated heat from a radiator is only around 20% of its output. The remaining 80% is convection. Forced convection is more space efficient than passive.
If you're running a heat pump system, aluminium radiators would be my choice. They have a heat transfer coefficient about 5X greater than steel. Steel radiators would need to be ~2.5X larger on a heat pump system than on a conventional central heating system.
 
Last edited:
Despite the name, the radiated heat from a radiator is only around 20% of its output. The remaining 80% is convection. Forced convection is more space efficient than passive.
If you're running a heat pump system, aluminium radiators would be my choice. They have a heat transfer coefficient about 5X greater than steel. Steel radiators would need to be ~2.5X larger on a heat pump system.
This is true, but if you have the space steel is half the price.
 
I thought I remembered radiated heat depends on the cube of the temperature but I see somewhere that it's proportional to the "fourth power of the absolute temperature" so now I just don't know :confused:
 
Holes in carpets don't look good. :(

Holes in laminate floor would be even worse. :(
Nobody's arguing that switching to a heat pump based heating system is always straightforward or even economical.

Just countering the myth that such systems simply can't be used in badly insulated buildings.
 
if you wanted to know how your existing system would cope with a heat pump, you should turn your boiler output temperature down to 50C, which implies that that's probably a typical flow temperature for a heat pump
Well yes, your existing system isn't designed for the lower temperatures. Which is why generally you do need some alterations to radiators as well as the heat pump.
think the installation costs themselves are a piss-take. I reiterate that there's no reason why a heat pump install should on average be triple what a gas boiler would cost. It's just milking the government subsidy
I don't really get this. It probably is triple the amount of work. In my house there's a load of new pipework between the pump and tank, total change within my airing cupboard and of course removing the gas boiler and whole supply. Plus the new radiators. It will take most of a week, whereas just swapping a boiler is a day.
 
Well yes, your existing system isn't designed for the lower temperatures. Which is why generally you do need some alterations to radiators as well as the heat pump.

I don't really get this. It probably is triple the amount of work. In my house there's a load of new pipework between the pump and tank, total change within my airing cupboard and of course removing the gas boiler and whole supply. Plus the new radiators. It will take most of a week, whereas just swapping a boiler is a day.
I had all of that done (bar ripping out tank instead of installing) when I changed a CH system to a combi boiler. £3k. Granted it was 10 years ago, but inflation hasn't tripled since then. Completely new location and pipework for the boiler, new rads, and the pipework in the kitchen had to be installed in the concrete floor.
Definitely didn't take a week either, though it was probably 3 days.

Edit: I can see a 5kW heat pump (should be adequate for a 3 bed flat) rolls in at £1800, which is about the same as the boiler after inflation. So that's a lot riding on the labour. I'm willing to bet that installation prices - which shouldn't be affected by economies of scale, or efficiency improvements to the heat pumps themselves - will come down quite a bit once/if the government rebate goes away.
 
Last edited:
Assuming plumbers are still using copper, that's where a lot of the expense will be. A grand doesn't buy you much copper these days.
 
Back
Top Bottom