xslavearcx
time for a nu-metal revival?
"the bible is the word of god"
"how do you know"
"it says so in the bible"
a bloody brilliant argument that kept me going for years....
"the bible is the word of god"
"how do you know"
"it says so in the bible"
I thought this thread was about the Green Party (specifically the England & Wales one)? What's with all this nazi shite?
Except that one has stuff about the nazis as well.This one is just called 'why the greens are great'. If it were called 'why the green party is great' (along similar lines to the why the green party is shit thread) then we would have to restrict ourselves to the Green Party of England and Wales.
Except that one has stuff about the nazis as well.
"The Greens" used in a UK context typically refers to the GPEW, not the environmental movement in general and definitely not entirely unrelated political parties which just happen to have some environmental policies.
When talking about UK politics "The Greens" means the GPEW. What do you think it means?Does it? Since when?
Like a lot of people on urban75 I have voted Green in the past when I have had the option. What party/group do you support?You're a member/supporter of theNazi ConservationistsGreen Party aren't you? It's OK, you can admit it
When talking about UK politics "The Greens" means the GPEW. What do you think it means?
Like a lot of people on urban75 I have voted Green in the past when I have had the option. What party/group do you support?
Across Europe the ‘Greens’ are nothing more than slightly rebellious Tory offspring, the same here really.
‘Climate bomb’ warning over China coolant release
A “climate bomb” of potent greenhouse gases 15,000 times more damaging to the climate than carbon dioxide is set to be released by some of the world’s leading producers of refrigerants following a ban on climate credits.
The companies, the majority of them in China, argue that a ban on trading of climate credits for the incineration of HFC-23 makes it no longer financially viable to destroy the gas, which is a byproduct of a substance used in air conditioners and refrigerators.
A warning by the Environmental Investigation Agency in a report to be released on Monday will raise the pressure on China to ban such gases and end economic incentives for their production in multilateral talks.
Some 19 factories – 11 in China – making HCFC-22 have been receiving climate credits under the UN’s Clean Development Mechanism for installing and operating incinerators to burn HFC-23 that is created during the manufacturing process, instead of venting it into the atmosphere. Facilities in developing countries can sell emission reduction credits to buyers in developed countries to allow the latter to meet their targets under the Kyoto protocol.
However, the European Emissions Trading Scheme, the world’s largest carbon market, banned trading in those credits last month after finding that the financial incentive drove companies to produce more HFC-23 instead of curbing it. Other climate exchanges have said they will follow, causing substantial revenue streams for the producers to dry up.
The EIA said an investigation had shown that most of China’s non-CDM facilities were emitting HFC-23 already. “If all of these facilities [under the CDM] join China’s non-CDM and vent their HFC-23, they will set off a climate bomb emitting more than 2bn tonnes of CO2 equivalent emissions by 2020,” it said.
People involved in the sector in China said this was likely to happen. “If there is no more funding, the CDM plants could start venting as well,” Mei Shengfang, deputy secretary-general of the China Association of Fluorine and Silicone Industry, said. He added that authorities were considering offering support.
An executive at China Fluoro Technology, one of the largest Chinese CDM plants, said: “Our company is still incinerating the HFC-23 now. If the money is used up, we can stop incineration. We can’t go on doing this, we can’t afford it and we have no duty to do it.”
Releasing HFC-23 into the atmosphere is not illegal. China has been blocking proposals for a ban as part of multilateral talks under the Montreal Protocol to phase out hydrofluorocarbons, which continue on Monday in Bangkok.
China raised hopes this month when President Xi Jinping and President Barack Obama of the US said at a summit that they had agreed to work together to reduce the production and consumption of hydrofluorocarbons. “This is a reversal of China’s attitude, and all eyes are on China now to see if it’s for real,” said Alexander von Bismarck, executive director at EIA.
When talking about UK politics "The Greens" means the GPEW. What do you think it means?
Like a lot of people on urban75 I have voted Green in the past when I have had the option. What party/group do you support?
This one is just called 'why the greens are great'. If it were called 'why the green party is great' (along similar lines to the why the green party is shit thread) then we would have to restrict ourselves to the Green Party of England and Wales.
Fortunately it isn't - the OP fucked up and, if you take a look at the sumfront thread you'll see that he probably won't be back any time soon as he's just been outed as a racialist loon with Nazi sympathies, there's irony or poetry or something in there - so we don't
Actually, wrong on both counts. I just can't be arsed to argue.
The "Nazi sympathies" is a particularly big joke when you consider that I grew up in a city (Plymouth) the centre of which had pretty much been levelled by them.
As I told Butch on Saturday night, if I was happy on Stormfront (as he seems to imagine) I would have stayed there and not taken all this crap from you, him, Spanky and all on here. But I didn't and I'm not.
TBH though I could do with spending a lot less time on boards, so as I said on that other thread, even if I don't get banned from here I might just take a big break from here anyway. It's not like we're all going to miss each other.
You've been caught out endorsing white nationalism. Go away. Don't come back.
Butch, no I do not endorse it. It's not for you to decide whether I can come back or not - it's for the mods.
You liar. We have all seen those posts.
Butch, no I do not endorse it. It's not for you to decide whether I can come back or not - it's for the mods.
If I endorsed WN, I wouldn't be stuck in OV, and I wouldn't get all the shit on there I've had from Fading Light, Lord Jim and others - sounds familiar?
Produce one such post, where I've endorsed WN, and I'll admit it and go. I don't recall making any at all except perhaps those where I talk about "the Orania solution" which isn't WN.
And that's the truth.
Actually, wrong on both counts. I just can't be arsed to argue.
The "Nazi sympathies" is a particularly big joke when you consider that I grew up in a city (Plymouth) the centre of which had pretty much been levelled by them.
As I told Butch on Saturday night, if I was happy on Stormfront (as he seems to imagine) I would have stayed there and not taken all this crap from you, him, Spanky and all on here. But I didn't and I'm not.
TBH though I could do with spending a lot less time on boards, so as I said on that other thread, even if I don't get banned from here I might just take a big break from here anyway. It's not like we're all going to miss each other.