TremulousTetra
prismatic universe
Why?From a personal pov, I'm very relieved to see Colin Barker's name attached to something critical. Not sure it will make any difference to the politics of the SWP, but I feel a little less mad.
Why?From a personal pov, I'm very relieved to see Colin Barker's name attached to something critical. Not sure it will make any difference to the politics of the SWP, but I feel a little less mad.
That's an interesting aside, given that the SP now seems to have a reasonable cross section of ages represented (at least where ever I've seen) what would you say they did to address that?
Ground it out mostly. Lots of emphasis on branches doing work on universities and colleges. The anti-war movement helped a lot as well. That was when the the first big wave of sustained youth recruitment came into the party.
Doh! A middle class party then.Ground it out mostly. Lots of emphasis on branches doing work on universities and colleges. The anti-war movement helped a lot as well. That was when the the first big wave of sustained youth recruitment came into the party.
That's an interesting aside, given that the SP now seems to have a reasonable cross section of ages represented (at least where ever I've seen) what would you say they did to address that?
Why?
i ask again, how did diana benefit from her being oppressed as a woman?
I never said Princess Diana was an oppressed, you did, so so explain how.in what concrete ways would you say she benefited from being oppressed.
most, if not all, where members of the opposition before the special conf, some before the 1st conf.
Just asking WHY you are relieved to see Colin Barker's name on something critical.Why what?
that's not quite what you said, is it?I never said Princess Diana was an oppressed, you did, so so explain how.
so what you're in fact saying is she DID suffer from women's oppression.She quite clearly did benefit from it, as does the rest of the ruling class, that's the point. You say she suffered from women's oppression, I would say her benefits quite clearly outweighed her losses. She did not suffer from women's oppression, in the same way the working class woman would. Point of fact. Which underlines the point that women's oppression is a class issue, which is the point at which many socialists part company with feminists on the analysis of women's oppression.
see #13625 in particular the highlighted section of your post.
i like giving him a kick now and again, that's why.i took rmp3 off ignore just, as the thread was becoming unreadable.
i now regret it.
why do people continue to argue with him? he's a fucking idiot. you're completely wasting your time.
ameni took rmp3 off ignore just, as the thread was becoming unreadable.
i now regret it.
why do people continue to argue with him? he's a fucking idiot. you're completely wasting your time.
it's like kicking a man made of shit. you end up with shit everywhere.i like giving him a kick now and again, that's why.
this is your most cunning 'like' harvest yet. bravo!perhaps we should all put rmp3 on ignore. 'like' this post to show you've done that.
what have you got to say about the amy leather faction, you know, the undeclared one, which the cc are accomodating to?Can you stop slagging rmp3 for a min to discuss how shit the oppo statement was? No confidence in their own politics that's why they will lose.
You swapped callinicos for Andy Newman, and you accuse the opposition of lacking confidence in their politics?Can you stop slagging rmp3 for a min to discuss how shit the oppo statement was? No confidence in their own politics that's why they will lose.
Can you stop slagging rmp3 for a min to discuss how shit the oppo statement was? No confidence in their own politics that's why they will lose.
And the CC will win? what exactly?Can you stop slagging rmp3 for a min to discuss how shit the oppo statement was? No confidence in their own politics that's why they will lose.
It isn't for no reason that rmp3 gets the response he does on here - he doesn't even attempt to understand the points others make or respond to them honestly.