Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

S********T : what is it like?

I hope you'll understand therefore if I don't answer that question, just as you most likely wouldn't want to be discussed on that board. If you really want to know I'll tell you by pm but I'd honestly prefer it if you dropped the subject.

This board's been far too much about me anyway recently, and that hasn't done me much good or Urban either.

Are you Nick Clegg with that mealy-mouthed answer? :D Are you really still friends with people on St***cunt?
 
Ta. Jesus wept. I spent an hour doing what meltingman suggested we do and look at his posts on sf. I saw him advising 16 year olds on how to best use the forum to further their 'racial awareness' and other similar stuff. His oft offered reason for posting there (and a wide range of other racists forums - ones i've never even heard of) is to use free speech to challenge racism etc - is taken apart by his own actual postings which mainly consist of idle back and forth chitter chatter with his racist friends. The challenging is notable mostly by its absence. It's clear that these people, their views and the assumptions they operate from are ones that he feels comfortable and at home with.

edit: and trying to get ideological racists to get involved in anti-ID groups in this country ffs.
 
It even attributes it to Greebo, Urban75 ffs

I don't remember using those exact words. And life has a nasty way of biting people on the backside when they misquote me.
Is this you meltingpot? Why does your signature quote a poster on here? Did you ask her permission before quoting her on far-right site?

http://wwwdotthephoradotnet/forum/showthread.php?t=69979&page=12
He did not, and the wording is changed from what I used. I don't talk like a hippy.
 
I don't remember using those exact words. And life has a nasty way of biting people on the backside when they misquote me.
He did not, and the wording is changed from what I used. I don't talk like a hippy.

Sorry. I'll take the quote down now.
 
http://www.st*rmfrontdotorg/forum/t959571-4/#post11121487

you on scumfront said:
I think there are "gender difference" reasons. Men in general are more territorial than women and less "inclusive" and friendly to outsiders, both of which correlate with WN.

Also, women tend on the whole to be more compliant than men and willing to go along with the dominant social paradigm, which is currently anti-WN.
What does this mean?
 
It was a good quote and a tribute to her, but no I didn't ask. Guess I'm in the s**t now.

The Phora's not a far right site btw, we've had this argument before.

There was no need to hippify it, and I wasn't the first person who came up with it. FWIW I've got no problem with you saying "we're human beings, not human doings" and attributing it to Unknown.

BTW I don't use my urban name elsewhere on the net, nor do I use my elsewhere names here.
 
It was a good quote and a tribute to her, but no I didn't ask. Guess I'm in the s**t now.

The Phora's not a far right site btw, we've had this argument before.

"a tribute"​

You have got to be joking, you disingenuous wanker. Words fucking fail me.
 
If you google the phora the first hit takes you to its intro which lists:

General Discussion Forum. Race Relations Emphasis. Discuss racialism, eugenics, nationalism, holocaust revisionism, history, philosophy, science, politics
 
"a tribute"​

You have got to be joking, you disingenuous wanker. Words fucking fail me.

Here's why I can't discuss things on here any more.

That is the literal truth. I liked that quote so much I wanted to use it on that site. Now that fact is being used to villify me.

Sorry about the hippification btw, Greebo; if I did do it I didn't imagine you would be offended.
 
What do you mean when you say women are less likely to be neo-Nazis (lets not use PC terminology here) because they're more compliant than men - does being compliant mean that you're not going to be an ideological neo-nazi? I thought that unthinking obsequious worship of a charismatic leader was pretty compliant myself? And going along with the dominant social paradigm - do you mean that women are more easily brainwashed, less willing to think for themselves etc?
 
If you google the phora the first hit takes you to its intro which lists:

Sure, but so what?

The only one of those I've had anything to do with is American Renaissance, when I got into a brief conversation with Jared Taylor (the fonder of AmRen) and invited him to our website (MootStormfront). I do not in fact post in any of those subforums (or similar ones, AFAIK) and never have.
 
Here's why I can't discuss things on here any more.

That is the literal truth. I liked that quote so much I wanted to use it on that site. Now that fact is being used to villify me.

Sorry about the hippification btw, Greebo; if I did do it I didn't imagine you would be offended.

That one's for you and Greebo to sort out between yourselves (though it is a bit sneaky, to say the least, attributing it to her and even directing people to the forum she posts on).

But it's the other quote frogwoman posted that I'm most interested in an explanation for right now. It's obviously sexist, reveals at the very least a sympathy for 'WN' and frogwoman's right - let's not use euphemisms - you mean Nazism (even implies it's somehow natural for men to be attracted to it, so one might assume you are yourself) and betrays a kind of biological determinist view that these days is pretty much unique to the far right.
 
Sure, but so what?

The only one of those I've had anything to do with is American Renaissance, when I got into a brief conversation with Jared Taylor and invited him to our website (MootStormfront). I do not in fact post in any of those subforums (or similar ones, AFAIK) and never have.

That's right. Close your eyes to it. Which means that the racist/nazi/fascist motivations for discussing them and setting up that forum doesn't exist either. Hence no confusion for you.
 
Sure, but so what?

The only one of those I've had anything to do with is American Renaissance, when I got into a brief conversation with Jared Taylor (the fonder of AmRen) and invited him to our website (MootStormfront). I do not in fact post in any of those subforums (or similar ones, AFAIK) and never have.

Can you answer my question please?
 
Sure, but so what?

The only one of those I've had anything to do with is American Renaissance, when I got into a brief conversation with Jared Taylor and invited him to our website (MootStormfront). I do not in fact post in any of those subforums (or similar ones, AFAIK) and never have.

So it is a far-right forum, don't pretend it's not.

Here's a tip:- When a website has a regularly updated forum called Jewology with its banner in the shape of Anne Frank with a Che Guevara hat with the star of David painted on it, with topics about how Jewish Hollywood is, with Admin that links to Pat Buchanan and American Renaissance in their signature - it's a far-right website.
 
Back
Top Bottom