I think it's a fairly safe assumption that the people responsible wouldn't be leaving it to what's remaining after a suicide bomber's bomb has gone off to claim responsibility.It does sound convenient however if he wanted to make sure the authorities knew who was responsible what better way than having your passport on you?
You're right. No reason to think that. But also, there was a suicide attack at a football match - not so decadent, presumably. Seems more likely to me that this is to be understood as attacks on people going about doing their normal things. Football, gigs, restaurants... you're not safe at any of these things.
It's certainly possible that this will serve as a motivation/excuse to fund further physical barriers, but it doesn't solve the problem of porousness via the rich expanse of Mediterranean coast.
it's just a natural response on a fastmoving thread. to ask for clarification. i went and looked it up afterwards ffsI cannot imagine a situation where I'd prefer to rely on the goodwill of Pickman's than on the distilled wisdom of all humanity, carefully prioritised and ranked by world-leading algorithms in giant server farms.
I don't really follow you tbh, all im saying is having a passport on you makes identification easier - probably something the attackers wantI think it's a fairly safe assumption that the people responsible wouldn't be leaving it to what's remaining after a suicide bomber's bomb has gone off to claim responsibility.
I don't really follow you tbh, all im saying is having a passport on you makes identification easier - probably something the attackers want
In France carrying ID is mandatory, I think, although I never got stopped, so one may habitually lug such things around. Plus if you've got a plan, probably best to not have it foiled at the first cursory check.Can imagine the bomber setting off ... "Wallet, keys, passport, yep" <checks door properly closed on exit>
Not the result of mass data collection at all, that plot was foiled by targeted intelligence on individuals of interest.
BBC said:As the security services watched some of the people moving in these circles, Ahmed Ali became an object of interest.
Where someone is of suspicion, I don't object to their telecommunications being pored over to detect if they are a real threat or not, but I object to everyone's email and browsing details being kept available for ever on the off chance that they might prove interesting to the security services.No. They have some quite clever people and some quite expensive analytical tools; the point is that they now need a robust legal framework in order to continue with the bulk data collection which they were previously justifying under rather obscure provisions of old telecommunications acts.
That is true, the stated goal of these attacks is a backlash against Muslims living in Europe which will then further increase radicalisation.
Undoubtedly in the next few days we will hear about how important mass surveillance is, how it's necessary to keep us safe etc which is why it's so important to effectively legalise what they have been already doing but if it it's so effective then how did last night happen?
that's handy
Exactly, J Ed. The intended goal of the attack is to divide French society on ethnic/religious lines and indeed to encourage revenge attacks against Muslim communities. It's disgusting. And it will work.
We know that some got stopped (whole boadload IIRC - but was that on the way into Ireland?).
It does sound convenient however if he wanted to make sure the authorities knew who was responsible what better way than having your passport on you?
if you look at the accounts and backstories of recent counter-terrorism, communication itself - as in comms intercepts, wiretaps etc - does not appear to be the primary means of identifying people of interest. Meeting people, going to places, doing things (e.g. trying to radicalise fellow mosque-goers) etc seem far more likely to put you on the radar than any kind of messages. Investigation of comms is apparently secondary, i.e. done after someone is suspected. Obviously that itself probably brings others into the mix.The traditional way in which persons become objects of interest is by studying who they contact. Communications metadata would undoubtedly have been a crucial tool in this investigation.
Fuck - BBC reporting (unsubstantiated reports of) more gunfire south of Paris now.
Reporting they were firecrackers at a wedding.Fuck - BBC reporting (unsubstantiated reports of) more gunfire south of Paris now.
Hope so.Reporting they were firecrackers at a wedding.
False rumours according to the Graun newsfeedFuck - BBC reporting (unsubstantiated reports of) more gunfire south of Paris now.
Fuck - BBC reporting (unsubstantiated reports of) more gunfire south of Paris now.
Reporting they were firecrackers at a wedding.