Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Liverpool 2013-14

no, just pointing out you're being a bit of a wanker. or do you expect people to come back and check threads to see if you've posted a sly comeback?
Yes. It's called keeping up with the conversation. Or in this case, you coming on here to stir up some shit for reasons known only to yourself. If you don't like my posting style then feel free to ignore me.
 
Yes. It's called keeping up with the conversation. Or in this case, you coming on here to stir up some shit for reasons known only to yourself. If you don't like my posting style then feel free to ignore me.
yeh cos you NEVER go on threads to stir up shit you little hypocrite
 
Never said I didn't. What I don't do is go around making bizarre moans about people not deigning to quote me when replying to a point I make. Kindly fuck off now.
it's a simple enough point: since the introduction of alerts many people rely on alerts to show when there have been replies and they then revisit the thread. so if you deliberately don't quote someone when 'replying' to them, it's being a bit of a sly cunt, getting in the last word while ostensibly retaining a figleaf of decency - "it's your fault you didn't see it, you should have checked the thread". now, it's no surprise to me if you behave like a wanker because despite your numerous amusing and witty posts you come across as a wanker. it's not down to you being a liverpool fan or anything like that, it seems to be the way you are.
 
it's a simple enough point: since the introduction of alerts many people rely on alerts to show when there have been replies and they then revisit the thread. so if you deliberately don't quote someone when 'replying' to them, it's being a bit of a sly cunt, getting in the last word while ostensibly retaining a figleaf of decency - "it's your fault you didn't see it, you should have checked the thread". now, it's no surprise to me if you behave like a wanker because despite your numerous amusing and witty posts you come across as a wanker. it's not down to you being a liverpool fan or anything like that, it seems to be the way you are.

Too much for you to simply check the thread? In case you didn't see it the first time around: KINDLY FUCK OFF NOW.
 
Too much for you to simply check the thread? In case you didn't see it the first time around: KINDLY FUCK OFF NOW.
i did see it, but what makes you think that asking me to fuck off is going to work? a more effective means would have been a simple 'yes, you have a point'. but pushing me isn't effective, unless you want me here.

if i'm wrong and you're not being a wanker, what's your reason for refusing to use the quote function?
 
so if you deliberately don't quote someone when 'replying' to them, it's being a bit of a sly cunt,
you've tried this argument before, it was drivel then, it is drivel now. its the egotists argument 'i only read a thread if its about me'. If I post directly after you, especially after a brief one liner, who would i bother to quote it?
 
you've tried this argument before, it was drivel then, it is drivel now. its the egotists argument 'i only read a thread if its about me'. If I post directly after you, especially after a brief one liner, who would i bother to quote it?
why did you then?

if it's drivel then tear it apart. but describing the argument as drivel without dissecting it suggests you're talking shit.
 
why did you then?
cant you read? 'If I post directly after you' - i didnt, not the bit that wanted quoting. When there are separate parts to a quote, it can be useful to split it up. But, usually, one can just reply, and it comes up as the next comment, so it is perfectly clear what is being replied to. Clarity is the key.

if it's drivel then tear it apart. but describing the argument as drivel without dissecting it suggests you're talking shit.
I just did tear it apart - you're just an egotist. If you want to contribute to a discussion you should do so whether your name is mentioned or not.
 
Yes. It's called keeping up with the conversation. Or in this case, you coming on here to stir up some shit for reasons known only to yourself. If you don't like my posting style then feel free to ignore me.

He's an Arsenal fan.
 
cant you read? 'If I post directly after you' - i didnt, not the bit that wanted quoting. When there are separate parts to a quote, it can be useful to split it up. But, usually, one can just reply, and it comes up as the next comment, so it is perfectly clear what is being replied to. Clarity is the key.


I just did tear it apart - you're just an egotist. If you want to contribute to a discussion you should do so whether your name is mentioned or not.
i didn't think it was a complicated point, but it seems to have eluded you.

quoting people's nothing about egotism, whether mine or anyone else's. i quote you to let you know that i'm responding to you: i don't know how many threads you've posted on today or how many people you've interacted with here, or whether you've been distracted by offline activity. in addition, threads are often fast-moving. quoting the person you're replying to helps other people see what's going on. and it also helps anyone reading the thread see how the discussion's developed, in part through the link back to the post quoted. it's a courtesy to people who are often supposed to be doing something else to let them know something's happened here. only someone who's something of an egotist would deliberately not use the quote function as it suggests that the non-quoter believes their post is so important the non-quotee will be back to see it.
 
Back
Top Bottom