camouflage
gaslit at scale.
"Smart" is like "sex". It's money if you know where to shop.
again, not really money, more a resource.
"Smart" is like "sex". It's money if you know where to shop.
Go on then!
16kEjyby1sYbZ49nqf1zVcnCG9fw5rGp1t
I'm rich!Have some more!
No trading doesn't have an algorithm.How much BC trading is algorithm driven? What tools are there?
.
No trading doesn't have an algorithm.
Yeah there is bot trading. It's pretty annoying as the micro trades clog up the market.
See all the .2 and .4 trades:
http://bitcoinity.org/markets
Mtgox have always had automatic trades options for users.I don't understand trading properly, that page means nothing to me. I vaguely understand the theory behind algorithms (cognitive science).
The trade-off here is that as virtual value is created, real-world value is used up. About 982 megawatt hours a day, to be exact. That’s enough to power roughly 31,000 U.S. homes, or about half a Large Hadron Collider. If the dreams of Bitcoin proponents are realized, and the currency is adopted for widespread commerce, the power demands of bitcoin mines would rise dramatically.
If that makes you think of the vast efforts devoted to the mining of precious metals in the centuries of gold- and silver-based economies, it should. One of the strangest aspects of the Bitcoin frenzy is that the Bitcoin economy replicates some of the most archaic features of the gold standard. Real-world mining of precious metals for currency was a resource-hungry and value-destroying process. Bitcoin mining is too.
fiddling while rome burns.http://mobile.bloomberg.com/news/20...g-is-a-real-world-environmental-disaster.html
an interesting article on the real-world effects of Bitcoin. the last line is interesting
just what the world needed right now eh.Yeah it's a design flaw. It's because of the "proof of work" principle behind generating the algorithm. In order to produce the currency at a set rate, it has to get harder the more you are able to produce. It almost *has* to get more power consumptive.