Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Babylon 5 vs Star Trek: the poll!

Which is better?


  • Total voters
    68
:) Know what I'm buying!

Babylon 5, by miles.

Have to agree Firefly is bloody wicked too.
 
makes a change, most other petrol fired engines are currently rusting on bricks in scum aren't then?
 
Voted B5

But I don't care, I enjoyed all of them.

The original ST is now too dated, NG was good, especially towards the end. DS 9 really started to join the stories into a 'sort of' history whilst also appealling to the war-ry buggers out there. Voyager continued in that line. Enterprise started good, lost it's way with the pre-occupation on the Time Wars that weren't mentioned in the other shows and the Xindi storyline. The last season was excellent and is what tthe rest of it should have been - bringing the other story lines together.

B5 was brill in that it was a packaged story line from beginning to end. Crusader might have been OK if it was allowed o continue, bit of a bummer that it was killed off.

Firefly - please... We were supposed to be talking about quality - not Rawhide in Space!
 
By the way, the Babylon 5 "Megaset" is to be released shortly, so it might be worth waiting to see if the indvidual Season boxsets will be reduced in price further....
(Bruce Boxenleiter is making a apparence at the Sf/Fantasy/anime convention being held at Excel at the end of this month to "plug" it, so to speak...).
 
'Babylon 5': fucking rubbish, rubbish, rubbish, rubbish, rubbish. With a sprinkling of dog's rod. :p

How thee compare to ye mighty 'Trek?! :eek: :D
 
Babylon 5 obviously. Star Trek was so sanitised and perfect.

If I recall the creator of B5 submitted it to the producers of Trek as a series to be set in the Trek universe, but they rejected it and instead came up with their piss poor version DS9 instead.
 
I heard Strazcynski, the creator of B5, may be on board to write the next Star Trek series in a few years' time. :cool:
 
Stigmata said:
I heard Strazcynski, the creator of B5, may be on board to write the next Star Trek series in a few years' time. :cool:


What I heard was that JMS sent an open letter to Paramount detailing his vision of a very different type of Star Trek. It had a five year story arc and he even wrote a back history. But it was rejected by Paramount.
 
shadows.jpg


B5 gets my vote.

there was even some continuity from episode to episode (when garibaldi was injured and he gradually got better over a couple of episodes)

i had a problem though not thinking of Bestor as Checkov occaisionally

RMF: I met Andrea Thompson (Talia Winters) at Gatwick Airpoort a few years back.
 
B5 series 3 shits on every other scifi program ever made, the whole vorlon/shadow intrigue over the whole programs life was masterful storytelling
 
DS9 was alright. The War saved it.

Voyager had its moments...or moment...depending how you look at it.

Enterprise was pants, until the last series, which was brilliant

Franchise too far
 
nightowl said:
wh smith had season box sets reduced to twenty quid a while ago

Bye bye sudent loan! Dont you love the way enterprise even ripped off quantum leap when the captain kept going into his own past to talk to Daniels.
 
Babylon 5 by miles. the earth civil war was cracking.
and it had these beauties

starfury5rh.jpg


anything touched by Berman and Braga is utter shite.
hopefully, now them and Majel Barrett have bled it to death, it won't be back for a few years. maybe they can get a decent writer by then.

star trek had too much pretendy techno bollocks, usually in the 42nd minute of an episode (janeway has now been returned from lizard form :) )
 
I always had a soft spot for Star Trek, but always felt Babylon 5 was a more realistic and less ridgid portrayal of the future: More complex society/cultural diversity, realistic power struggles, etc.

I absolutely hated the crappy B5 music though, and the dialogue sounds like it's been recorded inside a metal container, it's really annoying- so artificial. I can't stand watching more than on B5 episode at a time, because the sound annoys me so much.

I love the OTT trickster character Q from Star Trek, he's like a rogue chaos element in the otherwise extremely ordered ST world... Stirring things up. Of course like all american villains he had to have a comedy british accent :D

(Oh, and BTW i didn't know that the actor who plays Red in Orange is the New Black used to be on Star Trek- she was Captain Kathryn Janeway on Star Trek Voyager, apparently.)
 
I always had a soft spot for Star Trek, but always felt Babylon 5 was a more realistic and less ridgid portrayal of the future: More complex society/cultural diversity, realistic power struggles, etc.

I absolutely hated the crappy B5 music though, and the dialogue sounds like it's been recorded inside a metal container, it's really annoying- so artificial. I can't stand watching more than on B5 episode at a time, because the sound annoys me so much.

I love the OTT trickster character Q from Star Trek, he's like a rogue chaos element in the otherwise extremely ordered ST world... Stirring things up. Of course like all american villains he had to have a comedy british accent :D

(Oh, and BTW i didn't know that the actor who plays Red in Orange is the New Black used to be on Star Trek- she was Captain Kathryn Janeway on Star Trek Voyager, apparently.)

You totally just bumped the 9 year dormant thread to share that fact :D
 
We're 8 episodes in to B5 and it's getting better. I am told that season 1 is significantly worse than the rest of it, so we're gritting our teeth through the cheesy bits. Can definitely see the potential though. All the politics and various powers at play.

It's a shame the DVD release has such a bad transfer - the SFX look really blurry, and composited scenes are even worse. They should have just left it in 4:3 like it was originally aired.
 
You totally just bumped the 9 year dormant thread to share that fact :D
Nah, I was going to start a "Star Trek vs. Babylon 5? the poll" thread, but the 'view similar threads' function helpfully showed such a thread was already made, and I knew someone would be along in seconds to point that out, so I didn't dare start my own new shiny thread... down to being a coward, really. :oops::thumbs:

BTW, read on the internet that it was Babylon 5's fault Star Trek eventually got axed, is this true? I'm not sure you can always trust the internet. :hmm::confused:
 
I would watch Babylon 5 again but I will never watch star trek again, well apart from the original series and maybe the ds9 tribble episode.
 
Babylon 5 is the better show if you ignore the routinely terrible script and acting (Londo and G'Kar aside, of course). So many of the big moments are pure cheese.

Accepting that it's a melodrama and enjoying the plot is the only way to go.
 
Back
Top Bottom