Couple of new stories touching on the background and the ongoing fall out in Spokane itself.
In this piece by a local journalist about how he was insufficiently sceptical about Dolezal's claims about the hate mail she claimed to have received, there is an interesting reference to how the story of her 'black identity' got picked up in the first place :
As Rachel Dolezal played her game, many of us played along - Spokesman-Review (Spokane)
These questions were bubbling up among more than one journalist in the region; they were being driven, at least in part, by information unearthed by a private investigator. I spoke to him on the condition that I not reveal his identity, and I know that he has done so with other reporters in the region. He would not say who he’s working for, though Dolezal has suggested that it’s connected to a criminal case against her brother in Colorado in which she may figure as a witness, and that’s why her parents have come forward at this point.
In any case, it was his probing into Dolezal’s background, and what he says he found, that motivated me to reconsider the question of her racial identity. That has presumably been a factor in the interest of other reporters, as well.
On the entirely idle speculation front I wonder why this private detective would need to conceal his employer, or indeed do much investigating, if he was working for her family. After all her parents and her brother were entirely happy to go on record and feed her to the media at the first opportunity they got (a public relations strategy almost as stupid as Dolezal's, which has helped raise the profile of the abuse charges against her brother to international level, and made them look like a bunch of arseholes). However I guess there's not a lot of point expecting them to act sensibly given their actions so far.
Another possibility is that the investigator might have been working for someone else who Dolezal had pissed off, or indeed was himself pissed off. One obvious area of possibility lies in the local police (a natural recruitment pool for 'private investigators') and Dolezal's involvement with the Spokane Office of Police Ombudsman Commission. She was thrown off this last night
Dolezal ousted from ombudsman commission - Spokesman-Review (Spokane)
Although the exposure of her lies and stupidity undoubtedly factored into the Council decision to remove her this all started some months ago. Spokane has (or rather had - the post is currently vacant) a Police Ombudsman. The role was established after the 2006
murder of Otto Zehm, a man with a developmental disability who was beaten, tasered and restrained in a manner which suffocated him after he had been reported as acting suspiciously while taking his own money out of a ATM machine.
The case generated calls for stronger police oversight. An Ombudsman was appointed in 2008 and given independent investigative powers in 2010. Police successfully argued that these powers breached their labor contract (effective trade unionism in action) and a stalemate followed until voters overwhelmingly passed a proposition in 2013 which gave the Ombudsman some rather circumscribed powers, and set up a five person Oversight Commission. Dolezal was appointed to that Commission in August last year. In December the Ombudsmen resigned followed shortly afterwards by his assistant. Both have cited difficulties with members of the Oversight Commission, including Dolezal, as a factor in their decision to go. In April the administrative assistant who is dealing with day to day matters while a new Ombudsman is being appointed, made a complaint of harrassment against the same Commission members. An investigation was carried out which produced a highly critical report (
PDF here). Dolezal has now been removed by the City Council, a second Commissioner who was leaving the area in any case has resigned, and a third will apparently be seeking to clear his name but will also probably resign.
Drawing conclusions from a distance about the local politics of this is a mugs game. However it seems obvious that some of the local support for her relates to this political background.
It would be tempting to conclude that this situation, seen by many as a successful attempt to sabotage attempts to hold the Police to account, was another direct consequence of Dolezal's lies and claims about her identity, and illustrates the damage they have caused. I'm not sure I'm entirely convinced on either score. As regards damage, even without deploying any advanced insights into the bourgeois nature of Ombudspersons and oversight committees, one has to be sceptical about institutions whose function at the end of the day is to shore up confidence in the Police. (The fact the Spokane Police seem ungrateful about this is neither here nor there). Either way I very much doubt that this will be the end of the matter as regards local dissatisfaction with them.
More to the point it seems a little more likely to me that Dolezal created difficulties for herself because she doesn't just have the hide of a white rhino, she also has all the political skills of one. (Unfavourable local comments about how she made no attempt to address the complaints in the report but flew off to give national TV interviews were interesting in this regard). The exposure of her lies and bullshit has just been icing on the cake, making it easier to boot her off.
Meantime the Spokesman-Review has received another piece of mail seemingly from the same source as that Dolezal claimed to receive
Spokesman-Review gets letter from writer who threatened Dolezal
Spokane police Officer Teresa Fuller said the investigation into Dolezal’s hate-crime complaints remains suspended and that the new mailing from “War Pig/Sgt. X” is unlikely to restart the inquiry.
One might conclude that the fearless defenders of justice in the Spokane Police department are genuinely convinced the letter is bogus. Or one might not. Either way it seems unlikely that we will ever know for sure.