gentlegreen
I hummus, therefore I am ...
Isn't a brain haemorrhage the opposite of a clot ?Spain has paused AZ vaccine due to 1 sudden death of a healthy teacher in Marbella
Isn't a brain haemorrhage the opposite of a clot ?Spain has paused AZ vaccine due to 1 sudden death of a healthy teacher in Marbella
Spain has paused AZ vaccine due to 1 sudden death of a healthy teacher in Marbella and a few other unusual thrombosis cases.
I'd take the vaccine any day, clearly it's remarkably safe, but you can see why there's worry - when there's potentially a recurring pattern, albeit affecting a tiny number of people.
At the risk of repeating myself, in Germany they had seen seven incidences of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis in ~1.6 million vaccinees. This is several times the general population background rate, hence the precautionary suspension. The general thromboembolic rate for all approved vaccines is running lower than that in the general population(s) so no cause to pause for that class of event alone.
The Bundesministerium für Gesundheit states it would expect to see 1-1.4 incidences of CVST in 1.6 million people in the two weeks post-inoculation but are seeing something like 6 times that, predominately in younger women, so pause out of a statutory duty of care.Shit and quick investi-Google says incidence of CVT of between 2-5 per million people per year.
Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis Incidence Is Higher Than Previously Thought: A Retrospective Population-Based Study - PubMed
Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis in our study was more common than previously reported, perhaps because of more complete ascertainment. Future CVT incidence studies should include comprehensive capture and review of neuroimaging.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Don't worry, I usually assume the best and even reading it back more critically I couldn't pick up on a preachy vibe.Hope you are feeling better now, that sounds really shitty.
Must admit, I did a bit of searching before having the jab about any potential interaction with medical conditions I have (fybromyalgia and an underactive thyroid). There didn't seem to be any, but the situation is ready made for nagging anxieties. Suppose it's ultimately a case of whilst they might not have mapped the side effects for every pre-existing condition, the overall benefits of the vaccine and the need to gets as many doses into arms wins out. For me, ultimately, the potential interactions of the vaccine with the conditions I have are not as bad as it would be getting Covid with those same conditions.
Edit: just read that back and it sounded a bit preachy towards you muscovyduck. Wasn't intended, I was just airing my own anxieties.
For me it hit from about 12 hours after injection (the tiredness and weirdly sore teeth) - at which point I took paracetamol in the form of Lemsip. Hope you continued to be side effects free or at least that they were mild!
You are the James Bond of U75. Or somethingI've not had any side effects.. as the BBC article says I guess it is down to genetics...
Hollis said:I've not had any side effects.. as the BBC article says I guess it is down to genetics...
You are the James Bond of U75. Or something
I have had an invite for another “first dose” with a second scheduled after. My GP is probably confused. I’m going to get one, this will act as the second.
I checked it’s the Pfizer jab.Better check it's the same version before actually getting jabbed.
I have had an invite for another “first dose” with a second scheduled after. My GP is probably confused. I’m going to get one, this will act as the second.
The Baroness had the Pfizer one and two weeks later developed a massive scaly rash over her back and arms.
She had to go to the Docs and get steroid cream for it. It's taken about ten days to go down.
I've got photos but don't want to put them up in case they leak into the wider domain. They're pretty nasty.
I’m nervous now to be fair. I only want the Pfizer jab. Are you sure the first and second jabs are differing strengths?I think the second dose is a different strength from the first so I'd check that. I remember during the trials they accidentally discovered that a lighter second dose was actually more effective.
Oh dear.Well we're now two weeks later and the rash is still there. She's had two trips to the Docs, one to a skin specialist and this week had a skin biopsy. She's got to wait two weeks for the results.
She's been given creams and steroids and she says the itching is receding. She does look much better.
Here's the rash when is started. It's all over her body apart from her head. It's scaly and itchy and obviously it bleeds where she's been scratching it.
View attachment 259464
I’m nervous now to be fair. I only want the Pfizer jab. Are you sure the first and second jabs are differing strengths?
I’m nervous now to be fair. I only want the Pfizer jab. Are you sure the first and second jabs are differing strengths?
No, not 100%. I just remember it was news at the time as it was some kind of happy accident that they discovered it. That may have been the Oxford one though. Have a google!
his body was filled with bubbles that he had to equalise, rather like being a human spirit level.