Indeed, and I always said that was bullshit at the time - much to the rage of the trots. Apparently, I am STILL wrong for thinking this at the time - even though I was subsequently proved right. .tbaldwin said:In 1996 again and again i heard people on the far left say. " That within 2 years of a new labour govt there will be a backlash as they fail to deliver and then more and more people will be looking to the revolutionary left"
Yeah right......
poster342002 said:Indeed - and I always said that was bullshit at the time - much to the rage of the trots. Apparently, I am STILL wrong for thinking this at the time - even though I was subsequently proved right. .
tbaldwin said:dennis do you get 9s and 6s mixed up? Easy mistake to make.
What were Militant/SP saying in 1996-7 dennis?
october_lost said:"Asylum seekers welcome here"
At a local Social Forum meeting, the local SWP organiser turned up solely to say that it was a waste of time and that he was leaving. The other SWP members looked bemused and didn't leave until he phoned them from outside and ordered them to leave!
Reply With Quote
Why is that ridiculous?october_lost said:"Asylum seekers welcome here"
TAE said:Why is that ridiculous?
ah yesglenquagmire said:I was at a John McDonnell rally last year with all the different micro-groups groups taking turns to give a speech (sorry, ask a question) at the end. The SP, SWP, AWL, CPGB, CPB et al offered their qualified support but when some Workers Power bloke got up and said he wouldn't be supporting McDonnell until he publicly called for the abolition of private property, there was a unanimous groan around the room.
I remember thatoctober_lost said:Anyway we gets down to London and most of the day has been uneventful and were demonstrating in central London while theres people petering out and a few skirmishes starting with some assembled crusties and the police and we came past Whitehall.
I was under the impression from the paper that he was holding that he was WP but of course I could be mistaken. But TBH I really couldn't care less which micro-sect this chap represented. The point was that the comment was ridiculous in the context where it was uttered.
for me, its more recent stuff, the 'We are all hezbollocks' from the SWP, old trots, etc...
durruti02 said:shining path supporters marching on a Community Defence march though Dalston back in the 8ts chnating " Mao! Mao! More Than Ever!"
Because its devoid of any sort of class arguement, it was obviously by a group who had no base or any impact upon the native/host community and singled out a group without reference to any wider problems. Its leftism at its best and frankly beyond parody, but its what I have come to expect from the swappies.TAE said:Why is that ridiculous?
"Victory to the Intifada" (although I didn't think that at the time, sadly).What's the most ridiculous thing you've heard at a political meeting/rally?
grogwilton said:STWs involvement in the Lebanon issue must have been important.
That's an alarmingly common way of thinking within my uni's branch of Labour Students though going by the engagements I have had on local message boards. They then have the nerve to accuse me of not knowing anything about the party because I have never bothered to engage with it's members... hello, who has been running the UK goverment for the past 10 years?!?cockneyrebel said:thinking that the Labour Party can be reclaimed for socialism is surely one of the most ridiculous things ever on the left.
nightbreed said:Back in the mid 80s there was a documentary about Liverpool City Council and Militant . The programme was relatively sympathetic until they interviewed one young LPYS member who , when asked her views about what is a socialist society, she explained amongst other things that cars would run on water.