To the Editor:
thank you for the welcome to Urban 75.
It is enlightening to note that whilst you are quite happy to allow serial posters to peddle their 'Evidence Free' assertions regarding the most significant attack on the British mainland since WW2, you elect to nail a thread opened with a review of Milan Rai's Book Launch in Yeovil which contains zero unsupported speculation.
Being aware of your legendary censorship of any thought that doesn't conform with your own, I took great care to ensure that all my observations, comments and questions (to Milan and as subsequently presented in the report) were appropriately referenced.
It would seem that the proprietor of Urban75 wishes to adopt the same cavalier attitude as Milan Rai when it comes to the application of one of the primary tenets of the British judicial system:
Ian R. Crane
thank you for the welcome to Urban 75.
It is enlightening to note that whilst you are quite happy to allow serial posters to peddle their 'Evidence Free' assertions regarding the most significant attack on the British mainland since WW2, you elect to nail a thread opened with a review of Milan Rai's Book Launch in Yeovil which contains zero unsupported speculation.
Being aware of your legendary censorship of any thought that doesn't conform with your own, I took great care to ensure that all my observations, comments and questions (to Milan and as subsequently presented in the report) were appropriately referenced.
It would seem that the proprietor of Urban75 wishes to adopt the same cavalier attitude as Milan Rai when it comes to the application of one of the primary tenets of the British judicial system:
Perhaps you would care to explain exactly which aspects of my earlier post failed to meet with your exacting standards of objectivity?Milan appears to be extremely cavalier with the basic tenet of British justice that the case against any alleged perpetrator must, at the very least, produce evidence that they had the opportunity to be at the scene of the crime. The evidence that is presently in the public domain actually provides two of the four alleged bombers with alibis that would appear to 'prove' that they could not have been on their respective Circle Line trains! I refer. of course, to the allegations against Mohammed Khan (Edgware Road) and Shezad Tanweer (Aldgate).
Ian R. Crane