Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The kulaks are revolting - does Urban back big farmer?

What do we do with the farmers?

  • Stop the tax grab.

    Votes: 9 10.7%
  • Stop the subsidies

    Votes: 9 10.7%
  • Send them to the gulags

    Votes: 11 13.1%
  • Send Jeremy Clarkson and Nigel Farage to the gulags

    Votes: 56 66.7%
  • Re-educate the Urban population.

    Votes: 8 9.5%
  • Re-educate the rural population.

    Votes: 5 6.0%
  • Nationalise all large farms with no compensation and collectivise

    Votes: 31 36.9%
  • Ignore, It'll soon be forgotten like the Cuntryside Alliance was.

    Votes: 16 19.0%
  • The Liberal Denocrats are winning here

    Votes: 5 6.0%

  • Total voters
    84
To be a farmer there, you have to be deemed fit to farm by the local administration. I doubt whether many landowners simply buying up farmland would pass that test.” He suggested a similar policy could be put in place in the UK, with true farmers given tax benefits.

In the UK the local administration will nearly always be filled with the landed gentry, so would probably result in fewer actual farms being farmed.

this fucking country.
 
The clue was in the " any land left unused for two years or more" bit, which allows a year fallow and an extra year to decide what you want to plant there.
Most "fallow" fields do in fact have something planted in them. Just not a cash crop. Just leaving them to nature doesn't work as well, so I think the limit is fine so long as planting clover or whatnot doesn't count as "unused".
 
I'm shocked, shocked I tell you:


View attachment 451951
Which is a bit rich considering how many Tories are tax dodgers. And farmers complaining about tax.
 
I think as usual this has been distorted by the very wealthy landowners and people buying up land to avoid tax....my cousin's husband who has been what he called a 'cowman' all his working life (now retired) working on different farms, only comment to this was that for all the whining he'd never come across a 'poor' farmer
 
I think as usual this has been distorted by the very wealthy landowners and people buying up land to avoid tax....my cousin's husband who has been what he called a 'cowman' all his working life (now retired) working on different farms, only comment to this was that for all the whining he'd never come across a 'poor' farmer
This.
No without reason they all vote tory.
 
Urban 75...innit, most of the UK Population have a completely manipulated idea of the majority of Farmers crooked parasitic ways
A lot of people have this romanticised vision of farming with cows grazing in the meadow and pigs snuffling about in the mud. Of course there are still farms like this but it's becoming increasingly industrialised. There's a mega dairy in the next village to me where they have 2000 cows who spend their entire lives indoors being fed on high protein food so they can be milked 3 times a day instead of the normal 2. I've lost count of the number of times the company that owns the farm has been fined for 'accidentally' releasing slurry into a nearby stream but they're making so much bloody money they just pay the fine and carry on.
 
“Ten landowners - just ten! - own one sixth of Dorset. They include Jonathan Harmsworth... whose family own the Daily Mail. Are alarm bells beginning to ring over the way this debate's being framed?”

Solid point from the twitter thread a few pages back. The whole argument is a mess - the change is a good one that only affects a few incredibly rich landowners pretending to be farmers. The rest is just noise by people deliberately misleading or being manipulated.
 
I've lived in the countryside most of my life and I'm in a position to confirm that farmers are all cunts.
Clearly I also live in the countryside and I don't think that.

I do sometimes wonder at the whole "legacy" thing though. By that, I mean being born on a farm and being expected to farm, negates people who don't want to do that or aren't really interested/don't like science etc.

For example: on the last thread, you didn't really understand how plants grow, and aren't really a "science guy" but equally why should you if you aren't interested in either science or applying it? I assume from other threads that you've posted on that you are quite intelligent, but clearly science isn't your thing/you don't know much about it - which is fine.
But it wouldn't be if you'd been brought up in an environment that demanded that you grew up and applied biology/chemistry for a living.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom