maybe it will be a brexit themed plague pit of a conferenceI’m excited for today’s press conference, whether it’ll be mainly brexit themed or only about the plague or both.
If a revolver is involved it might be one of the few things capable of cheering the nation.maybe it will be a brexit themed plague pit of a conference
I'm not in favour of pay-per-view, but I would make an exception.View attachment 244611
something like this, now harry is somewhat estranged from the other members of the foul windsor clan
It's for Wednesday & Thursday.Just passed over us in Cornwall headed east now. Not as much of a deluge as yesterday I have to say.
and now, Weather warnings for heavy rain/flooding for areas including the lorry parks of Kent & the SE...
View attachment 244618
I think the agreement on level playing field is more like, if the UK starts to degrade workers pay and rights then the EU does reserve the right to raise tariffs on those or other items to level the playing field. My understanding was that up till recently UK didn't agree with EU's right to raise tariffs in that case.One thing I don't understand about the Brexit negotiations is whatever has happened to the disagreements about the "Level Playing Field". Is that all agreed now? Has the UK effectively agreed to abide by EU regulations foreever. If so why are the Brexiteers not a teeny bit upset about this. I thought that not following EU regulations was one of the motivations for Brexit. Why has it gone so quite on the Level Playing Field?
I think the agreement on level playing field is more like, if the UK starts to degrade workers pay and rights then the EU does reserve the right to raise tariffs on those or other items to level the playing field. My understanding was that up till recently UK didn't agree with EU's right to raise tariffs in that case.
We won't know fully until an agreement is reached and published, but it's likely to be the same range of social rules as the UK is bound by now, with the exception of free movement of people. So, the immediate thing will be the the status quo and an agreement not to lower standards. The difference will be that the sanction for breaking the rules is currently a fine, and that will change to having tariffs imposed. There may also be additional rules about consulting trade unions for certain types of legislation, because the EU has to do that under its own rules.It would be extremely interesting to hear the detail of that aspect of the agreement. When will it be discussed? What specific rights and pay levels of British workers are being protected?
It is quite fair that if we want to supply goods into the EU, they have to comply with EU standards. For example the CE mark. Japanese and American companies have to comply with this as we will have to also.Isn't it more than just writing across the status quo. Isnt "the level playing field" also a dynamic thing that in the sense that it means that Britain even outside the EU will have to following EU regulation as it changes if it wishes to avoid the imposition of tariffs. In essence Britain by leaving the EU would go from a "rule maker" to a "rule taker".
Yes in all likelihood, but that's additional, which is why I said "the immediate thing".Isn't it more than just writing across the status quo. Isnt "the level playing field" also a dynamic thing that in the sense that it means that Britain even outside the EU will have to following EU regulation as it changes if it wishes to avoid the imposition of tariffs. In essence Britain by leaving the EU would go from a "rule maker" to a "rule taker".
I think there will be a deal, 'we' have moved from demanding 60% of the fish to 35% of the fish. The EU was demanding 25% of the fish.
If this is actually about fish at all, then it sounds like the last bit of the dance.
The alternative is that it wasn't really about fish, was about avoiding having to define a brexit in any concrete form, which was always going to mean compromise and specifics, after promising people that we would have sunlit uplands and rule the waves.
I bet he didn't have to worry about the enforcement method for the level playing fieldKing Charles the Second granted Bruges fishermen up to 50 boats the right to fish in UK waters in perpetuity.
Will that be a charter broken in limited and specific ways?
King Charles the Second granted Bruges fishermen up to 50 boats the right to fish in UK waters in perpetuity.
Will that be a charter broken in limited and specific ways?
please to say how many fishermen from Bruges there areKing Charles the Second granted Bruges fishermen up to 50 boats the right to fish in UK waters in perpetuity.
Will that be a charter broken in limited and specific ways?