Answering myself, not a good sign I'm sure.I have no idea how LMHR is structured, does it have any kind of conference to elect officers?
Post 205, by Tony Collins. And that's it.
If true I think this would mean that the factions demand for him not to represent the party or to hold any full time positions would be in place even though the CC have not formally conceded it
Shame it would have been good if they'd taken UAF down as well
No it's not. It's an example of you using an argument against a particular form of pro-status quo anti-fascism to try and argue that anything outside of it doesn't take account of or try to appeal to broad anti-facsist or anti-racist themes. It's not true historically and it's certainly not true nowThis is an example of why the left is regarded as a joke by a lot of my "normal" (ie non affiliated) mates, both in work, in my union and my personal mates.
The UAF is an anti Nazi organisation and it would be good if it was brought down?
Seriously?
It's enough to make me weep and give up.
Fair enough mate...hate the SWP...God knows they seem to now hate a lot of the left but I think you need a little perspective. I'm mixed raced asian...I live with a white woman and we have 2 kids together (one light kinned with blue eyes and the other dark skinned with brown eyes)...I couldn't give a shit about who runs an anti Nazi group or to be honest how many there are. If some wanna sing songs, some wanna pray, if some wanna march, petition, have meetings or physically oppose the Nazis when they march then good for them ...at least they are ALL openly opposing them.
My kids carried a banner on a UAF march about 4 years ago...it said "one of us is brown and one of us is pink but we both think the BNP stink." They've still got it and still remember going on the demo. Surely that is a good thing for the future. Or is it only good if you can go beat the shit out of them so everyone else bar the brave and tough should stay away?
Sorry for being liberal but surely it's the scum in the BNP and EDL etc. that need to be taken down?
Well said Comrade Spurski, but I don't think Spanky's "bring down the UAF " represents "the left", joke or otherwise
No it's not. It's an example of you using an argument against a particular form of pro-status anti-fascism to try and argue that anything outside of it doesn't take account of or try to appeal to broad anti-facsist or anti-racist themes. It's not true historically and it's certainly not true now
The reason the left and the new posters here are alienated from the wider working class are not to do with someone saying fuck the UAF - and if you think that they are then you're not even close to understanding what a hole you are in.
This is an example of why the left is regarded as a joke by a lot of my "normal" (ie non affiliated) mates, both in work, in my union and my personal mates.
The UAF is an anti Nazi organisation and it would be good if it was brought down?
Seriously?
It's enough to make me weep and give up.
Fair enough mate...hate the SWP...God knows they seem to now hate a lot of the left but I think you need a little perspective. I'm mixed raced asian...I live with a white woman and we have 2 kids together (one light kinned with blue eyes and the other dark skinned with brown eyes)...I couldn't give a shit about who runs an anti Nazi group or to be honest how many there are. If some wanna sing songs, some wanna pray, if some wanna march, petition, have meetings or physically oppose the Nazis when they march then good for them ...at least they are ALL openly opposing them.
My kids carried a banner on a UAF march about 4 years ago...it said "one of us is brown and one of us is pink but we both think the BNP stink." They've still got it and still remember going on the demo. Surely that is a good thing for the future. Or is it only good if you can go beat the shit out of them so everyone else bar the brave and tough should stay away?
Sorry for being liberal but surely it's the scum in the BNP and EDL etc. that need to be taken down?
No it's not. It only been kept alive by inflating the edl for the last three years. A wrecking yard for people the cc don't want and useless in terms of anything else. Fuck the uaf.I have no idea what you are referring to and I ain't in a hole mate...I'm in no organisation and ain't alienated from anyone in my union or in work. I think that some of the lefts "it's my way or fuck you" is a very unfunny joke that damages some great causes.
Fuck the UAF???? Like I said a little perspective is needed. You may not like some of those who formed it and you may think there are other tactics that are better to beat the fascists but to want to see an anti Nazi organisation go down the toilet is plainly nonsense.
I have no idea what you are referring to and I ain't in a hole mate...I'm in no organisation and ain't alienated from anyone in my union or in work. I think that some of the lefts "it's my way or fuck you" is a very unfunny joke that damages some great causes.
Fuck the UAF???? Like I said a little perspective is needed. You may not like some of those who formed it and you may think there are other tactics that are better to beat the fascists but to want to see an anti Nazi organisation go down the toilet is plainly nonsense.
The UAF are a dreadful, uttery ineffective, undemocratic and pitiful organisation that have done precious little to build a coherent anti-fascist movement in this country. This is view based on bitter personal experience, not sectarianism. What successes there have been in beating back in the EDL and the BNP are in spite of, not because of, the UAF.
No it's not. It only been kept alive by inflating the edl for the last three years. A wrecking yard for people the cc don't want and useless in terms of anything else. Fuck the uaf.
You may not be alienated from anything or anyone - the wider left is, your whole point rested on this being the case. Yet you put this situation down to someone on this board saying the UAF is shit? It's not. It's due to a membership and leadership pursuing their own immediate interests to the detriment of the sort of immediate class interests that, if fought for consistently, would make those wider aims a practical possibility.
That's exactly what you're doing in regards the UAF. Any criticism of them is met with exasperated criticism from you.
Like I said mate ... you need a little perspective. My kids experience of the UAF has been different to yours. Going on the demo and feeling that they had their say was a very positive experience for them... If they heard your view (fuck the UAF) they'd stay well away from you ... my point being that you'd have alienated your anti nazi argument, experiences and ideas from them cos they'd think you were a prick.
I think that every person who is fighting for a better world...or who is fighting against war, injustice, discrimination etc. has a responsibility to debate in a way that brings as many people together as possible without betraying key ideals. I'd never compromise with some one who was scabbing on a strike but I would work against racism and fascism with a labour party member or a UAF member. It's the inability to do this that also damages the left in my opinion
So, by definiton the UAF can't be criticised because your kids had a good time at one of their events. Great. And anyone who thinks different is a prick. You really do sound like the open to anyone sort that your next paragraph tried to paint you asLike I said mate ... you need a little perspective. My kids experience of the UAF has been different to yours. Going on the demo and feeling that they had their say was a very positive experience for them... If they heard your view (fuck the UAF) they'd stay well away from you ... my point being that you'd have alienated your anti nazi argument, experiences and ideas from them cos they'd think you were a prick.
I think that every person who is fighting for a better world...or who is fighting against war, injustice, discrimination etc. has a responsibility to debate in a way that brings as many people together as possible without betraying key ideals. I'd never compromise with some one who was scabbing on a strike but I would work against racism and fascism with a labour party member or a UAF member. It's the inability to do this that also damages the left in my opinion
No they are a not, if you think that they are then try and establish how and why.I have no issue with criticising the UAF...I ain't a member of it and ain't precious about it....I am "exasperated" at reading people write that because they hate Martin Smith and or the SWP that it would be great if it (the UAF) was taken down by the rape crisis and reading comments like fuck the UAF.
EVERY organisation should be open to criticism as should any person. My only point is that these comments are part of what makes people stay well away from the "left".
I
The anarchists wishing the uaf would just 'fuck off' need to think about where that would leave our side.
Listen i've quite happily worked alongside UAF and SWP members on many different occasions, but that's the not the same thing as supporting UAF as an organisation, is it? As a organisation it's utterly ineffective as an anti-fascist group, that weakness has been exposed dozens of times where the UAF has had derisory turnouts and relied entirely on the police to protect them from severe beatings. And you have to remember that the UAF's main purpose is not to defeat fascism or the EDL, but to recruit on the behalf of the Socialist Workers Party. That's it's primary function, anti-fascism comes 2nd to that.
And you say I'd never compromise with someone scabbing on a strike, well I'd never compromise with an organisation that hands over information on militant anti-fascists to the police (which UAF have done) or an organisation that actively colludes with the police and the EDL to choreograph their demos (as they did in Bolton, and many subsequent demo's thereafter)
Sorry but the bit about Bolton is nonsense, if they were colluding with the police why did the police dive into the demo to arrest people like Smith and Bennett? Bolton was possible the last time UAF/SWP tried to organise any attempt at all to actually confront the EDL directly. There were major problems but collusion with the police was not one of them.Listen i've quite happily worked alongside UAF and SWP members on many different occasions, but that's the not the same thing as supporting UAF as an organisation, is it? As a organisation it's utterly ineffective as an anti-fascist group, that weakness has been exposed dozens of times where the UAF has had derisory turnouts and relied entirely on the police to protect them from severe beatings. And you have to remember that the UAF's main purpose is not to defeat fascism or the EDL, but to recruit on the behalf of the Socialist Workers Party. That's it's primary function, anti-fascism comes 2nd to that.
And you say I'd never compromise with someone scabbing on a strike, well I'd never compromise with an organisation that hands over information on militant anti-fascists to the police (which UAF have done) or an organisation that actively colludes with the police and the EDL to choreograph their demos (as they did in Bolton, and many subsequent demo's thereafter)
In the same situation as now but without people running around going OMG the EDL are coming! The edl are coming!Jeezus folks spurski was quite right. 'fuck the uaf' is a shit position for anyone on the left. Criticize the uaf, replace them, do what you want but don't let your hatred of the swp leadership get you to the point where you can say it would be a good thing for any left organisation to just collapse and make our side weaker. I saw a Morning Star guy selling his paper in downtown Swindon today (quite shocked me!). If I'd walked past and said 'fuck you' he would have assumed I was a rightwinger. I have issues with his politics but I think it's good he was there not a bad thing. The anarchists wishing the uaf would just 'fuck off' need to think about where that would leave our side.
Tell you what, spurksi - don't just jump in uniformed. Wait and see what people mean and why when they say things like "Fuck the UAF" or "It would be good if it goes down". This board and the discussion ongoing did not start the second that you joined.This is a different thing to someone wanting the UAF to go down due to the rape crisis in the SWP. Criticism is entirely valid. If you think that the SWP use it to recruit so their tactics in it are hindering the fight against fascism then people like my daughters will listen and could develop their ideas and understanding of how to fight the Nazi's ... they may or may not agree with you but they'd definitely hear you out. That is a very different explanation and point of view to "Fuck the UAF" or "It would be good if it goes down" ... I have no knowledge re the things you said re handing names over etc. so would not tell you (or anyone else) that a little perspective is needed I'd have asked what happened and how did this info get out cos I'd want to learn about it. In my opinion that's very different from the comments I have brought up
Sorry but the bit about Bolton is nonsense, if they were colluding with the police why did the police dive into the demo to arrest people like Smith and Bennett? Bolton was possible the last time UAF/SWP tried to organise any attempt at all to actually confront the EDL directly. There were major problems but collusion with the police was not one of them.
I'm not an anarchist but imo it'd leave us much better off, it'd give people opportunity to build an anti-fascist movement that firstly) actually effective and secondly ) not linked to a parasitic Leninist cult run by rape apologists.
There's nothing worse than seeing the SWP loyalists using the UAF as a shield to justify their shit party and their shit way of operating, as if the decline in the EDL and BNP had anything to do with them. It's utterly dishonest.
God you may be the most sophisticated anarchist I've listened to but you have very little that isn't ad hominem to say.In the same situation as now but without people running around going OMG the EDL are coming! The edl are coming!
Did you two decide that the long running criticisms of the UAF and how they operate are due not to informed analysis but to dislike of Martin Smith btw? Thanks for doing that.
How handy, bolshie saw someone who illustrated his point. (He even winked as if to say look i know i make up loads of examples but this one is true, it really really is)
Sorry but the bit about Bolton is nonsense, if they were colluding with the police why did the police dive into the demo to arrest people like Smith and Bennett? Bolton was possible the last time UAF/SWP tried to organise any attempt at all to actually confront the EDL directly. There were major problems but collusion with the police was not one of them.
Tell you what, spurksi - don't just jump in uniformed. Wait and see what people mean and why when they say things like "Fuck the UAF" or "It would be good if it goes down". This board and the discussion ongoing did not start the second that you joined.
If you invent many handy examples over a very long period, then pointing it is not ad hominem - it's actually necessary to point it out. A morning star seller, in swindon. Illustrating your case. My arse.God you may be the most sophisticated anarchist I've listened to but you have very little that isn't ad hominem to say.
Ha ha you are a joke, I invent nothing you idiot. Come and meet me in central Swindon next Saturday at lunchtime the guy will be there again.If you invent many handy examples over a very long period, then pointing it is not ad hominem - it's actually necessary to point it out. A morning star seller, in swindon. Illustrating your case. My arse.