Are there any physics types still here? If so I would like your opinion on the (so-called) super determinism solution to the quantum measurement problem. It's basically rejecting Bell's assumption of statistical invariance (aka free will). The assumption which everybody has always insisted we must assume. Breaking it either sounds crazy or possibly obvious and probably both. I'm not sure. It's such a straightforward idea just handled with a bit of care. So local hidden variables it is after all.
Sabine Hossenfelder who is one of the people working on it also has a youtube channel. Here's her video on super determinism.
I don't normally go to youtube and expect to find a quick and easy solution to a problem that's been bugging theoretical physicists for several decades! But it makes a lot of sense and I'm stanning it. Paper here.
www.frontiersin.org
They claim it's testable too.
Sabine Hossenfelder who is one of the people working on it also has a youtube channel. Here's her video on super determinism.
I don't normally go to youtube and expect to find a quick and easy solution to a problem that's been bugging theoretical physicists for several decades! But it makes a lot of sense and I'm stanning it. Paper here.
Rethinking Superdeterminism
Quantum mechanics has irked physicists ever since its conception more than 100 years ago. While some of the misgivings, such as it being unintuitive, are merely aesthetic, quantum mechanics has one serious shortcoming: it lacks a physical description of the measurement process. This “measurement...
They claim it's testable too.
