chilango
Hypothetical Wanker
blah blah blah.
Instead of picking on the "soft target" of Plaid, how about answering the questions above...
Your thread on permaculture was constructive, mind.
blah blah blah.
"Keep Wales out of the War on Terror" and "Keep the War on Terror out of Wales".
Only an anti-capitalist party and broad socialist movement can adequately defend this.
Who is attacking the welsh language and rural culture in Wales at present? Is it not, Plaid in Gwynedd ripping the heart out of local communities with largest school closure programme in Wales?
Only our anti-capitalist politics can defend local culture and language, as is seen in the case of Plaid who when in power - because they are a neoliberal party - who ultimately support the very forces that are destroying local cultures and language as witnessed in their accelerated destruction of local culture in Gwynedd by ripping out the hearts of rural communities: Local rural schools.
. There is a difference between running a council with budgets and obligations to the law and the government, and your fantasy politics which take place in your head.
Instead of picking on the "soft target" of Plaid, how about answering the questions above....
well...?
(I'm waiting for Niclas and Lewislewis to protest Plaid being called the soft target?)
Critical or organise a "counter demo" ?
I'd love to see you do a counter demo against Irish Republicans...
So by being "critical" of these groups means plastering their imagery all over a blog?
So how are you going to acheive this by empty sloganeering and provocative internet postings that wind up the very people you should be convincing?
...I know this thread is a wind up and started the debate but you arguments aren't coming out of it with much credibilty despite their theoretical "correctness".
The Notting Hill carnival, as with all such events, is a celebration of different cultures and their uniqueness/diversity. One could easily imagine a similar celebration of Welsh cultures.
Why point out that Claudia Jones was a "Black Communist woman"? Surely she is just a communist? what does her gender and skin colour have to do with owt?
Which nationalists on here are like "Orangemen" bit of slur that, no?
More interested though in how you plan to translate your rejection of nationalism into action within the context with which Respect works in Wales.
well?
You're conflating "nationalism" with support for Plaid Cymru. Lazy, Udo.
...and also misses the range of positions within "nationalism".
Do you think the St Davids Day parade is a Plaid rally?
...still waiting for some positive ideas on how to critically engage with these forces
Why "Wales" here Udo?
I think he's out swimming the Yangtze, you might be a while waiting for an answer there Chilango...
Actually, couldn't have been him. You'd never get him near that much water, now that I come to think of it!
Udo - you posted a very provacative OP and then raced back to a bog standard class v nation defence that few people on urban would disagree withHe's more of a fish swimming in the sea of the people. Have you & Llantwit ever considered going into stand-up? you're such funny guys.
I'm still waiting for some ACTUAL arguments from the nationalists here. So far, all you've got is a lot of foaming at the mouth that someone would even dare to suggest that all social phenomena should be subjected to critical and intellectual scrutiny. I think it's quite a dangerous and fanatical mindset when you have closed systems of discourse.
And then we get the nasty side of nationalism from Brockway that you can't comment on Welsh nationalism if you don't have the necessary racial credentials and the absurd notion that I am an opressor. He has yet to actually give some in-depth explanation of his claim that Wales is under occupation by England or how he can justify his claim that I, a low paid young guy, am someway an opressor. But this is the dead-end of nationalism - the enemy is not international capital and it's administrators but rather ALL english (powerful and powerless, rich and poor).
In answer to an earlier post by Lewislewis I wouldn't consider myself to be a "leading cadre" or spokesperson for anyone.
That's hardly fair. He's nearly done 3000 posts. Give the guy some credit.I would add that I can barely recall a more pompous, po-faced original post than the one above.
Spoken like a true New Labourite. New Plaid - New Wales.
I hate to break it to you, Lewislewis but socialist-led councils have actually - in the real world in Britian and elsewhere - defied both the law and the government by refusing to carry out cuts in local services and attacks on working people and even forcing budgets to be extended. But to pull off this feat we would need a very different organisation to Plaid or Labour based on a very different model of organising through building social movements in civil society rather than the style of managerial capitalism that the capitalist parties in Wales favour.
The 4 parties in Wales have all embraced the neoliberal consensus that it's better that two-thirds of the wealth of our society stays with ten percent of the population rather than using that incredible wealth to fund public services for the other 90& But there's no reason to see the current set-up as an iron law that can never be changed.
And then we get the nasty side of nationalism from Brockway that you can't comment on Welsh nationalism if you don't have the necessary racial credentials and the absurd notion that I am an opressor. He has yet to actually give some in-depth explanation of his claim that Wales is under occupation by England or how he can justify his claim that I, a low paid young guy, am someway an opressor. But this is the dead-end of nationalism - the enemy is not international capital and it's administrators but rather ALL english (powerful and powerless, rich and poor).
Two councils who refused to implement cuts come to mind - Labour-led Clay Cross (Derbyshire) in 1973 and Militant-led Liverpool in 1984.
In both cases the councillors who refused to make the cuts were personally surcharged and, in some cases, were made bankrupt as a result.
I don't know the outcome of the Clay Cross rebellion but in Liverpool the situation was promising... it was during the miners' strike and Thatcher was fighting on a number of fronts. There was mass support for the council's policies (which included building 5,000 council houses) but Labour's leadership let down the councillors (not surprisingly - Kinnock detested Militant).
The surcharging resulted in the smashing of the Militant/Labour hold on the council and to this day Liverpool has a Lib Dem council. It was a massive defeat.
I don't know what the alternatives were in either case, but in both Liverpool and Clay Cross there was a mood to fight among the wider working-class.
This is patently not the case today, after 25 years of Thatcherite-Blairism. We can pretend that we're on the verge of 1917 (again) or we can try to build a new movement for socialism that, like Chavez, takes on the progressive nature of national liberation and isn't dependent on bureaucratic centralism and empty sloganeering.
Now where did I put my jackboots, I've got a rally to attend...
We can pretend that we're on the verge of 1917 (again) or we can try to build a new movement for socialism that, like Chavez, takes on the progressive nature of national liberation and isn't dependent on bureaucratic centralism and empty sloganeering.
So who is the Welsh Chavez, Ieuan Whinge Jones or Rhodri Morgan?
or we could take a leaf out of the book of the old Poplar council tradition. Nice article here -
http://www.socialistreview.org.uk/article.php?articlenumber=9426
Would also recommend michael lavalette's pamphlet on the subject, and Noreen Branson's book
Consider English, now fast becoming the language of international business and therefore the international language. How did the English language evolve? In the Middle Ages, the idea of a single national language was unheard of. The commoners spoke various local dialects of anglo-saxon, the Lords spoke french dialects, the church used latin. It was the development of the national state, the modern legal system that began to eradicate local dialects and uniformise language into a single national language and the development of national broadcasting, transport networks etc that gradually began to eradicate local dialects. In short, the process of capitalist expansion and globalisation.
niclas, there is an extract here -
http://www.socialistworker.co.uk/art.php?id=8606
and is available from bookmarks here -
http://www.bookmarks.uk.com/cgi/store/bookmark.cgi
Do a title search on "George Lansbury And The Rebel Councillors Of Poplar" They also have the Branson book "Poplarism" - but I would guess you have seen that
Udo...any chance of some replies?
or is your work here done?
L Trotsky said, "Hitler was petit bourgeois, but not every petit-bourgeois is Hitler. There is, however, an article of Hitler lodged in every petit-bourgeois".*coughs politely*