Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Snouts in the trough in Caerphilthy

That they even thought they'd get away with this without anyone noticing is almost as astonishing as their having the barefaced cheek to do it in the first place.
 
The best bit is they actually try and defend it and dont seem to grasp how wrong this is.
 
seems lobbying the meeting worked a bit
Union members lobbied a meeting of Caerphilly council's Labour group on Tuesday night at the council's headquarters in Ystrad Mynach.
They demanded the council rescind a decision to increase council chief executive Anthony O'Sullivan's pay grade from a maximum of £131,000 to £158,000.

In a statement issued after the meeting, Labour councillors said they "apologise, accept and wholly understand the concerns expressed by staff, trade unions and members of the public for the recent senior remuneration pay decision by a unanimous vote of a cross-party delegated committee"
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-politics-20783451
really hope it is reversed
 
Caerphilly council chief executive pay rise 'unlawful'
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-south-east-wales-21674236
_66223666_caerphillyprotest.jpg
 
glad the sneaky so and so's have been now been caught out properly
fair play to the staff and trade unionists doing the initial catching

fair play to this
The Welsh government said: "It is entirely right that the Wales Audit Office should look into this in the public interest.
"We expect all public bodies to justify and account for decisions to increase senior pay effectively and an important part of that is following the proper procedures in making such decisions.
"The public should be able to see that decisions of this magnitude are taken in a transparent way and are subject to proper scrutiny."
no action tho still
The council reversed the decision in January and cut Mr O'Sullivan's pay rise from £27,000 to £5,000. As a result, the WAO said it had decided not to seek a court ruling.
 
suspended
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/s...l-council-gets-stand-in-chief-91466-32983345/

and spent a shedload on surveillance of its staff
In a response to a request made by the group under the Freedom of Information Act, Caerphilly revealed that Conquest Surveillance Services of Blackwood had been paid £48,205 in 2010-11 and £62,487 in 2011-12 – a total of £110,692 over the two years.

Outlining the reason for the surveillance, the council said: “To monitor staff who were suspected of committing a crime against the authority eg fraudulently obtaining sick pay, theft of council property/ supplies etc.”
Caerphilly is the only council in Wales to have used private investigators and one of only four in the UK to have done so.

The report suggests that councils like Caerphilly are using a loophole in the law to get round restrictions on surveillance activity introduced by the current UK Government.

It says: “We are seriously concerned there is a gap in UK law emerging around surveillance and the ability of third parties to conduct surveillance operations without proper regulation.
Read more: Wales Online http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/2013/03/20/council-criticised-after-spending-110-000-spying-on-employees-91466-33022674/#ixzz2O7bfuMO4
 
rotten!

an investigation of the investigators investigating :facepalm:
Since it was revealed on WalesOnline last week that Caerphilly council has spent £110,000 over the last two years spying on employees suspected of wrongdoing, we have established that the chief executive of the company undertaking the surveillance work was until last year one of the authority’s managers.

Dayton Griffiths, who was appointed chief executive of Blackwood-based Conquest Surveillance Services in 2012, was previously head of the council’s insurance claims department – which itself was responsible for commissioning the surveillance work.
Mr Griffiths has confirmed contracts had been awarded to Conquest without following a competitive tender process – a practice he defended.
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/2013/03/28/caerphilly-council-investigates-its-use-of-a-company-to-spy-on-workers-91466-33074255/#ixzz2OpDhc6Na
 
2 senior staff 'arrested'
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-south-east-wales-23149215
Police were called in after a critical Wales Audit Office (WAO) report said Caerphilly council had acted unlawfully in the way it awarded the increases.
Avon and Somerset Police said two people were being held on suspicion of fraud and misconduct in public office.
The council said it was co-operating fully with the investigation.
In March Avon and Somerset Police were asked by Gwent Police to look at the WAO findings on the council.
 
rotten!

an investigation of the investigators investigating :facepalm:

Best thing is Dayton Griffiths said in a subsequent article that:- “I was never asked to go out for tenders. Conquest were very effective and we were happy to give them the work.
“Everyone knew Conquest was awarded contracts without going out to tender. I used to go to council meetings and report on both internal and external surveillance operations. No-one ever mentioned anything about tenders.
“I’d come from the private sector and didn’t know about the standing order they’re mentioning now.”

That is the biggest joke ever - he had worked in local authority since 1993 - Islwyn Borough council days so new full well about 'standing orders'.


http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/2013/03/28/caerphilly-council-investigates-its-use-of-a-company-to-spy-on-workers-91466-33074255/#ixzz2OpDhc6Na
 
also, anyone seen and been following the mess in Pembrokeshire and Carmarthenshire Councils re cash payments made to senior staff in lieu of pension payments!!
 
Up in court
http://m.southwalesargus.co.uk/news/11702878.Caerphilly_council_officers_in_court/

They are accused of "deliberately failing to publish agenda and reports for a meeting of the said Council's Senior Remuneration Committee in advance of said meeting".

Charges state the men "deliberately introduced gratuitous material into one of the reports that was to be considered at said meeting so as to provide an apparent justification for exempting that report from public consideration".
 
Back
Top Bottom