Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Shit toad watch, the science (not actually a toad)

JimW

支那暗杀团
"The pumpkin toadlet, which is a frog but not a toad, is so terrible at landing its jumps that its sheer incompetence has become a subject of scientific inquiry. A team of researchers from the United States and Brazil that includes Confetti and Singh say they have an answer: The miniaturized toadlets are so tiny that the fluid-filled chambers in their inner ears which control their balance function rather ineffectively, dooming the valiant little jumpers to a lifetime of crash landings."
frog-jump.gif

Perhaps readers would like to share other piss-poor creatures they have known, No humans though, or we'll be here all night.
 
Humans are the shittest. The only species that ever came up with the idea that they should have to pay to exist.
 
Pandas are obviously the most useless shittest creature on Earth. Nobody would mourn them if they went extinct.
They get a bad rap IMO because they do bimble and that looks crap under the glare of publicity but served them fine for millennia in the mountain bamboo groves until we encroached.
ETA I mean, compared to a frog so bad a jumping I assumed the gif was a cracker toy being tossed.
 
"The pumpkin toadlet, which is a frog but not a toad, is so terrible at landing its jumps that its sheer incompetence has become a subject of scientific inquiry. A team of researchers from the United States and Brazil that includes Confetti and Singh say they have an answer: The miniaturized toadlets are so tiny that the fluid-filled chambers in their inner ears which control their balance function rather ineffectively, dooming the valiant little jumpers to a lifetime of crash landings."
View attachment 327533

Perhaps readers would like to share other piss-poor creatures they have known, No humans though, or we'll be here all night.
Rubbish cats that fall asleep on fences and end up falling off.
 
here's a totally shit animal

756.jpg
 
Prompted by the news of people across several counties reporting a loud boom today, caused by one or several Typhoons going supersonic to intercept a plane… Presumably the size and loudness of sonic booms is linked to the size of the object flying above Mach 1? And if so, would hypersonic missiles produce a loud boom too? Or is it linked to the wing area of the object?
 
Last edited:
Prompted by the news of people across several counties reporting a loud boom today, caused by one or several Typhoons going supersonic to intercept a plane… Presumably the size and loudness of sonic booms is linked to the size of the object flying above Mach 1? And if so, would hypersonic missiles produce a loud boom too? Or is it linked to the wing area of the object?

Yeah, you’d get a decent sonic boom from a hypersonic missile. They might try to conceal this by staying subsonic until a particular height is reached, or until over the ocean (location dependent etc).
 
Back
Top Bottom