Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Scottish independence - as an Englishman, am I "wrong" not to give a crap?

UKIP are clearly an English party and for some voters a vote for UKIP represents that,

I fecked up the quote but
It should be EIP then :)
 
I'm curious why that assertion should result in such a hostile reaction littlebabyjesus
This deserves an answer.

First, I was at work, so short answers bashed out in a couple of seconds were in order. That doesn't lend itself to nuance.

Second, I don't like seeing people retreating into national stereotyping and generalising, and discussion of such things in terms of a nationalist 'us' and 'you'. 'The Scots' are this; 'the English' are that. Not only is such stereotyping invariably well off the mark, it is counter-productive and divisive.
 
One of the many problems here comes from taking 1/10 of a place and comparing it to the other 9/10s. It can be very misleading as you're not really comparing like with like. Also, Scotland has about half the number of foreign-born residents than the rest of the UK - 7% compared to 13%.

And that survey even on its own gives a complicated picture - 45% wanting Scotland to have stricter immigration rules than the UK, for instance, is a pretty high figure.
You could ask Scott Blinder if he took that into account. ( scott.blinder@compas.ox.ac.uk or migrationobservatory@compas.ox.ac.uk ). They also have a Twitter thing: @MigObs

There's a bit on methodology here: http://www.migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/reports/appendix-b-methodology
 
From the general mainstream media it looks like things are taking a bit of a 'yeswards' turn - is that right or is it just more Westminster-centric twaddle?
 
From the general mainstream media it looks like things are taking a bit of a 'yeswards' turn - is that right or is it just more Westminster-centric twaddle?

I don't know. It feels like that from here, from people I've been talking to at work/on social media etc noticeably so since Cameron's speech but I don't know how representative my friends are.
 
I don't know. It feels like that from here, from people I've been talking to at work/on social media etc noticeably so since Cameron's speech but I don't know how representative my friends are.

Yeah, hard to tell how representative these things are but I'm sure Disco Dave's efforts have been heartily welcomed by the 'Yes' camp.
 
Yeah, hard to tell how representative these things are but I'm sure Disco Dave's efforts have been heartily welcomed by the 'Yes' camp.
It seems so obviously counterproductive to many people that I've heard at least twice independently since Friday the theory that Cameron's actual intention was to drive people into the Yes camp. The theory goes that the Tories want to increase their chances of a majority at Westminster but have to be seen to be trying to save the Union. (It's like the Father Ted Eurovision episode. Cameron's speech is the equivalent of My Lovely Horse, original non-plagiarised version).
 
It seems so obviously counterproductive to many people that I've heard at least twice independently since Friday the theory that Cameron's actual intention was to drive people into the Yes camp. The theory goes that the Tories want to increase their chances of a majority at Westminster but have to be seen to be trying to save the Union. (It's like the Father Ted Eurovision episode. Cameron's speech is the equivalent of My Lovely Horse, original non-plagiarised version).
 
It seems so obviously counterproductive to many people that I've heard at least twice independently since Friday the theory that Cameron's actual intention was to drive people into the Yes camp. The theory goes that the Tories want to increase their chances of a majority at Westminster but have to be seen to be trying to save the Union. (It's like the Father Ted Eurovision episode. Cameron's speech is the equivalent of My Lovely Horse, original non-plagiarised version).
It does sound like that. However, I think it's entirely possible (and probable) that Cameron is in fact so blissfully un-self-aware, and confident of his own charm, that he will believe that he is helping. In your analogy, he is Ted (or indeed Dougal), not the cynical eurovision host.
 
It does sound like that. However, I think it's entirely possible (and probable) that Cameron is in fact so blissfully un-self-aware, and confident of his own charm, that he will believe that he is helping. In your analogy, he is Ted (or indeed Dougal), not the cynical eurovision host.

Didn't he, or one of the senior Tories, actually say they were a hindrance a few weeks ago?
 
It does sound like that. However, I think it's entirely possible (and probable) that Cameron is in fact so blissfully un-self-aware, and confident of his own charm, that he will believe that he is helping. In your analogy, he is Ted (or indeed Dougal), not the cynical eurovision host.
This is the thing, though. They don't seem to be self-unaware. I happen to think he does think he's helping. But it's hard to reconcile the two, which is why people leap for the conspiracy theory.
 
Back
Top Bottom