Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Reclaim Brixton movement - meetings and April 25th protest planned

'Reclaim' is so general a word - it is hard to pin down what 'Reclaim Brixton' means. So far I can understand that it is inclusive of many ralated causes to save the market traders and oppose Lambeth council on various issues arround planning and housing.

And reclaim it from people who are only here to profiteer. The massive problem that anywhere with a "vibrant" local culture has, is that some people will always want to "buy into" the culture at a safe distance (as opposed to doing the normal thing of moving somewhere and finding your own way), and some people will always be on hand to marketise local culture and sell it on as a "consumer experience" (hence the whole Clapham = partytown meme). I know one can't really "reclaim" Brixton from that commercialisation of our culture - as the old saying goes, "money talks" - but that doesn't mean we shouldn't rail against it or cast the occasional clog into the money machine.

I'd like to 'reclaim' or perhaps just 'save' London from becoming an even more divided city - with only rich people living within zone 2 and cleansed of the poor. I'm not sure we all want to 'reclaim' the same things and I'm reading this thread to find out exactly what others want to reclaim. It is a valid question to ask - what do we want 'reclaim' and for whom? There is no go-back-in-time-a-tron.

I don't think we can save London from becoming an even more divided city, because it's what those with the money want - safety and security - and that only comes with straight divisions between haves and have-nots. We were lost the moment "gated communities" were allowed back in the '80s.

I don't want to hear an argument of who is allowed to live or work here in Brixton - that is the kind of small town/ village mentality, petty mindedness, xenophobia that I moved to the big city to avoid. I'm fed up of the the 'I'm more Brixton than you' and 'you are all gentifiers' attitude' I keep hearing (IRL as well as here) The kind of personal abuse that I've read on this thread is not helpful to anyone.

Some people feel threatened. I know I certainly do. My council has pretty much said, w/r/t my estate: "Fuck the people that live there, we're going for regeneration". The problem is that "it's not for us". State-led regeneration never is. It has a long and ignoble history of removing many of the "indigenous" people through simple economics.
Anecdotally, this sort of engineered demographic change finds favour with our current local administration. They're sanguine about elements of their core electorate - the "problem" families in the social housing who take up so much of their time - being removed, because they see those votes as being replaced in the majority by those of "nice" people who don't make such demands on them.

I've moved on a bit from "you're all gentrifiers" to "I'm happy to welcome anyone who participates in the wider community". What I don't welcome is people who want "the Brixton experience" while remaining at a remove from that community and their effect on that community. My vision of "reclaiming" Brixton is the continuance of the fluidly multi-cultural, multi-class, reasonably sexuality-blind atmosphere that has come into being over the last 40 years or so. All those elements go toward making Brixton the place I love, and the removal of any of those elements will - in my opinion - have the effect of destroying what makes Brixton different.
 
Reclaim Brixton from the same bunch of Labour tossers who have been complicit in making what Brixton is today. The chance has come and gone, until the next time. Looks like the majority who voted for slimy Chuka don't really give a fuck about what is going on - turkeys voting for Xmas.

Edited.
"Reclaim Brixton" from Labour, fine.
it's not just about Lambeth Labour, though. It's also about the relentless marketisation of "Brixton as a tourist experience", where that benefits a narrow pool of property-owners and a narrower pool of business-owners, but kebabs everyone else.
 
Calling people 'punters' is not helping them either. It's what the gambling and prostitution business use as a term for those less esteemed than the less esteemed.

It's part of the common lexicon of my pro bono clinic - funnily enough we have a sense of humour, pretending that we're people of ill-repute.
 
Thing is, plenty of people work pro bono. Most don't mention it every chance they get. That's nothing to do with my disliking what you post, or being "prejudiced", it's about the fact that you throw your "good works" and your education in peoples' faces. Most of us grew out of that by our early 20s, and just get on with doing what we can.

I have mentioned it maybe two or three times on these boards in four years of advising, all pertinent.

Don't caricature my position with "every chance [you] get" because it is obvious nonsense that undermines your general posting still further.
 
Anyway, reflecting the chorus of those less keen on viciously personal attacks and intending to get back on topic - I am yet to be convinced that the whole idea of "reclaiming" an area, any area for that matter, makes sense.

It has similarities with revanchist and/or irredentist ideas, which almost always depend on some romanticised, concrete myth, which on closer inspection, is not so concrete at all.
 
You think I do pro bono for my CV?

You think that city law firms give one tiny quantum of a shit about pro bono?

How fucking naive are you?

City law firms do give a shit about pro bono - it makes them look very decent and is good press. Just go to the front page of any City law firm's website and there it is, nowadays they call it "Corporate Social Responsibility".
Are you sure you know what you're talking about?
 
City law firms do give a shit about pro bono - it makes them look very decent and is good press. Just go to the front page of any City law firm's website and there it is, nowadays they call it "Corporate Social Responsibility".
Are you sure you know what you're talking about?

Right...

So that's why over the course of maybe 15 interviews with about 6 different firms over the past 3 years, not a single one asked about my participation in pro bono...
 
Anyway, reflecting the chorus of those less keen on viciously personal attacks and intending to get back on topic - I am yet to be convinced that the whole idea of "reclaiming" an area, any area for that matter, makes sense.

It has similarities with revanchist and/or irredentist ideas, which almost always depend on some romanticised, concrete myth, which on closer inspection, is not so concrete at all.

Similarities my arse. It doesn't hark back to a mythic golden age or a wish to reclaim territory, it merely wishes to preserve some of what makes our home our home.
 
Last edited:
I have mentioned it maybe two or three times on these boards in four years of advising, all pertinent.

On six different threads, more than once on most of those threads. That six threads where you mention "my pro bono work" or "my pro bono clinic". I haven't included any of the times you've mentioned pro bono as a general thing, because that's not what we're talking about

So, not "two or three times on these boards". Double that many threads, and many times than number of instances. The search function is your friend.

Don't caricature my position with "every chance [you] get" because it is obvious nonsense that undermines your general posting still further.

The "obvious nonsense" is the "hardly ever" line you tried to spin above.
 
On six different threads, more than once on most of those threads. That six threads where you mention "my pro bono work" or "my pro bono clinic". I haven't included any of the times you've mentioned pro bono as a general thing, because that's not what we're talking about

So, not "two or three times on these boards". Double that many threads, and many times than number of instances. The search function is your friend.



The "obvious nonsense" is the "hardly ever" line you tried to spin above.

Congratulations on your diligence. I have been on these boards well over ten years, I have advised pro bono for around four years and, I can't be asked to check your findings so I'll take them on trust, I have mentioned my pro bono advice six times...in four years.

Damning stuff, truly damning.
 
Also, I'm still not sure what the underlying point is - the fact that I provide free legal advice to residents of Lambeth who need it on areas such as housing - that's totally irrelevant to the subject matter, provides me with no special insight, renders my opinions beyond worthless, or merely winds you up because you would rather someone else was doing it in the first place?
 
Congratulations on your diligence. I have been on these boards well over ten years, I have advised pro bono for around four years and, I can't be asked to check your findings so I'll take them on trust, I have mentioned my pro bono advice six times...in four years.

Damning stuff, truly damning.

Lets hope you read documents more thoroughly than posts.
Not "six times".
6 different threads.
More than once on each thread (not including this one, by the way).
 
To be fair, I made an attempt to drag it back on topic just up the page but that seems to have slipped beneath the waves. I'll steer clear for a while to allow others to plot a better course.

(see proximate post above...)
 
Also, I'm still not sure what the underlying point is - the fact that I provide free legal advice to residents of Lambeth who need it on areas such as housing - that's totally irrelevant to the subject matter, provides me with no special insight, renders my opinions beyond worthless, or merely winds you up because you would rather someone else was doing it in the first place?

The underlying point is that you offer an opinion and qualify it with (to paraphrase) "I do pro bono work in Lambeth and none of my punters have ever mentioned anything about reclaiming Brixton", (your post #1213) as though this has any meaning with regard to the movement "Reclaim Brixton", which is as much about community and community issues as about the individual sufferings of the people of Brixton and Lambeth.
That I find you dickheadish, self-promoting and self-aggrandising is irrelevant, and doesn't render your opinions worthless. It renders them worthy.
Of scrutiny.
 
Back
Top Bottom