Firstly can i implore you to use the multipul quote function from now on this disapline or even using the quotation tool as is is beyond the simple ability of a 4 year old. for anyone else it's simply inexcuseable.
having to wade though your tirades in order to attempt to answer them is painful without it and won't be attempted again.
never the less i will attempt this:
Garfield: "Rachamim reportedly said he would provide proof on this matte and has not.": Yes, said t to one person, who insulted me from their first post and whom I continued to try and engage in an adult and meaningful way. When the answers were not forthcoming in what they viewed as a "timely fashion," it went from insult to injury as the saying goes.
their actions/insults still prompted you to post i will provide proof later.
there was no obligation for you to say this and as has been point out no auspices where this would or could be enforced you were offering to be forth coming and now you are being disengenious.
you haven't even had the presence of mind to say actually i can't find sources for this however i beleive it happens as i have stated. you haven't even said i can't be arsed with this nonsense i have better things to do with my time. you have however repeatly when asked said i will provide proof later.
that's a commitment on you part. one you are able to recant at any time but have seen fit not to. again stating you will provide further proof.
It's you undertaking this obligation no one is thrusting it upon you.
you don't therefore get ablsoved of the comment until you have done one of the following.
- prefferably cite your orignial sources with translation (this is an english speaking board after all)
- or say fuck it can't be arsed and retract
- or retract fully as subsiquently it turns out you were acting on incorrect information.
None of it implies or suggest guilt or deceit on you behalf by being adult enough to act.
what does is consistantly saying i will provide proof. and then failing to do so.
I have however, in this thread just a while ago agree to provide a source on one of the 3 questions to another poster, one whom has been able to take a somewhat objective stance and act maturely...Talk about "acting like an adult."
good then you'll have no objection to acting as laid out above then either.
"Claiming top be a defacto authentic source of info.": WHAT? Are you serious? Why would you EVER think that? I do not resent anyone but myself. I do not work for the govt and am no longer in the army. I might very well have access to things you do not, still having a family there, and close mates, but I have never claimed that I was a source of anything other than my own opinion.
you claim people don't understand becauser they don't live there. in fact truth be told you don't live their either do you. your family might live there but you don't.
you dismiss other peoples accounts of their expeirnce in both the OT and GAZA as they are clearly anti israli and when this fails either Judeophobic or self hating dependant on which camp they fall into.
You have set the bar/standard for how you are treated here with your reactions and insults (both personally and tbh to the intelligence) of your fellow posters.
You make up constant excuses without listening to others or engauging with debate on the level of the debate.
you seem to think that your swathes of text have more value if they are bombastic and verbose but in terms of content per word they are utterly bereft.
"Disrupted.": By offering my own opinion? By posting without agreeing with YOUR views As if your open insults do not disrupt?
no stop wriggling again you are well aware it's precisely this deliberate out of context summiseation of others points of view which purposfully build up a straw man to argue against and then pull down.
the inference is all yours and ironically suggests a very plain motivation in your contrarey nature.
regardless of the off topic ad hom, this isn't a thread about my behaviour here or about how i post.
It is a thread about about the manner in which you psot and a suggestion that all things would require the burden of proof with any claim.
"People have been banned for less.": Problem though is that as you should have seen when Mono initiated that little thread on banning me, noone could produce a true reason why it should be done. Ironically, it was shortly aftew that Moono itself was banned.
Moono is not banned.
They quit posting because of your constant disruption and background noise.
as well you know.
They were threatened with a ban by fridge magnet for pursuing you and requesting your soruce your information or shut up.
sadly, i think fridge made the wrong call, he was asking posters who ahere to the rules and regulations of the site to adhere to them more consistantly than you yourself have been held up to. which consdering your continued slander is in my view a mistake.
Take it to heart. Your thirst for "Blood" might produce results you never imagined. I like to believe that such open hatred like yours might one day be banned.
this is a threat and it is being made very appearnetly as such.
foolish.
moreover please state the blood lust i have posted with sources to vaildiate your claim.
this kind of slur is unacceptable and patently dishonest.
I'll also have some direct full quotes which is shown as direct hatred.
it might also be worth while stating for the record you are such an insignifncance as to be worth zero emotional response from me, not even disgust. you have no credibility on this matter and clearly from your other endevours and your good kill comments i'd think we can all see who is the real ambassidor of hate round here.
I might get sweary or terse with people or rant like a motherfucker, don't confuse that for a seniment of hatred. you are utterly foolish to do so.
Grandma is correct on one thing though...Basically all I have done in THIS thread is try to defend myself and Grandma does not realise that her/his comment says alot more than she.he thinks it does.
it says clearly you are utterly unable to provide proof of your claims and are attempting personal slurs against posters in order to reassert your dominance within a conversation which along with being highly embarrassing for your also provides chapter and verse as to why people ceased taking notice of you or what you say.
Why should anyone have to defend themself to a bunch of anonymous people? Furthermore, why should threads like this be allowed to exist? The person cannot get me to pay attention to them or their rants in most any other thread so they begin one like this. So silly and sad.
they don't.
why would some anonymous person offer to provide proof for something they new was a lie and then repeat that claim and further offers of proof afterwards.
you are right though it is silly and sad.
the longer you continue this without resolution other than eveyrone deciding that you are an unwelcome guest with particularlly nasty racist supremacist ideas about blood lines and good kills the less functioning internaction you will get as more and more people just chose to ignore your witterings...
). You've proved your point, everyone else knows that, just because one person won't agree with you hardly makes any difference when they only repeat the claims when provoked into doing so.
retty sad since did just that in a current thread where 2 people asked me in an adult manner.
