Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Prince Harry

I thought my conversation with Rutita1 was in the end quite productive. Maybe she can correct me if that wasn't the case. I'm not really sure what business it is of yours that other people are having a conversation.
Was it a PM conversation then? Because I think he was only referring to the one you were having on a bulletin board with dozens taking part.
 
Sigh. I give up. This place really is quite toxic sometimes. Everyone chooses to interpret everyone else in the least charitable way, myself included - which I hate.

I'm honestly trying to change that, and interact with people in a positive manner, and asking questions is part of that. All that comes back is antagonism. This isn't worth it any more.
 
Sigh. I give up. This place really is quite toxic sometimes. Everyone chooses to interpret everyone else in the least charitable way, myself included - which I hate.

I'm honestly trying to change that, and interact with people in a positive manner, and asking questions is part of that. All that comes back is antagonism. This isn't worth it any more.
That's why you're better off just being rude to people.
 
That is exactly what I said you Muppet. :) He will automatically become a prince when Charles ascends.
You explicitly took issue with the fact that Meghan was upset Archie didn't become a prince when he was born. You were nauseated by the fact she said that. Your words, not mine.

I'm simply correcting you, because she actually never said that. She specifically referred to the convention that Archie would become a prince when Charles became king, and that she was told this convention was to be changed for Archie.

Will you retract your comment now that I've proven you indisputably wrong? Your original, incorrect comment is below for reference:

Probably the most nauseating thing for me was the insinuation that their sprog didn't become HRH because of racism.
 
I'm honestly trying to change that, and interact with people in a positive manner, and asking questions is part of that. All that comes back is antagonism. This isn't worth it any more.
There's nothing particularly positive about asking questions, and asking more questions than you offer up ideas can come across as a bit entitled.

And there's plenty of positivity on these boards, just not usually on whatever's the big scrap thread of the day.
 
I thought my conversation with Rutita1 was in the end quite productive. Maybe she can correct me if that wasn't the case. I'm not really sure what business it is of yours that other people are having a conversation.

ItWillNeverWork Since you tagged me I will respond although as we are having a public discussion others can and do join in, just as we did. :)

Did I find it productive? Yes inasmuch as I got my point across, was able to answer your questions, highlight things you didn't seem to know and challenge you reading me badly when you suggested I was intent on taking offence, deliberately avoiding to answer your questions and being an 'academic' :)

Did you find it productive?
 
Last edited:
Sigh. I give up. This place really is quite toxic sometimes. Everyone chooses to interpret everyone else in the least charitable way, myself included - which I hate.

I'm honestly trying to change that, and interact with people in a positive manner, and asking questions is part of that. All that comes back is antagonism. This isn't worth it any more.

It can feel like that at times. I feel like that at times. I think most of us have a 'pick your battles' approach to Urban generally because it can be so polarising.
 
I think I was going on her whole outlook on life which albeit is only something seen on telly...but is aligned with saving chickens and being a vegan and very conscious of racism and womens rights...

I had no idea about her being a vegan. I listened to significant chunks of that interview and she didn't mention it once.
So I had to Google and apparently she "tries to eat vegan during the week". Which makes her everyone's favourite kind of vegan. :thumbs:
 
You explicitly took issue with the fact that Meghan was upset Archie didn't become a prince when he was born. You were nauseated by the fact she said that. Your words, not mine.

I'm simply correcting you, because she actually never said that. She specifically referred to the convention that Archie would become a prince when Charles became king, and that she was told this convention was to be changed for Archie.

Will you retract your comment now that I've proven you indisputably wrong? Your original, incorrect comment is below for reference:

Yep but MEGHAN...you can just see she's a wrong'un! Her behaviour! She breathes! :)
 
You explicitly took issue with the fact that Meghan was upset Archie didn't become a prince when he was born. You were nauseated by the fact she said that. Your words, not mine.

I'm simply correcting you, because she actually never said that. She specifically referred to the convention that Archie would become a prince when Charles became king, and that she was told this convention was to be changed for Archie.

Will you retract your comment now that I've proven you indisputably wrong? Your original, incorrect comment is below for reference:
I think this is a misreading of what Sas posted. He said he was nauseated by the insinuation that the kid didn't become HRH at birth because of racism, and backed that up with the relevant shiz.

I don't think you're right about this.
 
I think this is a misreading of what Sas posted. He said he was nauseated by the insinuation that the kid didn't become HRH at birth because of racism, and backed that up with the relevant shiz.

I don't think you're right about this.

That wasn't the insinuation that Harry & Meghan made though; they acknowledged that the brat wouldn't be an HRH until Charlie became king, their gripe is that 'they' were working to remove that from being possible.
 
I had no idea about her being a vegan. I listened to significant chunks of that interview and she didn't mention it once.
So I had to Google and apparently she "tries to eat vegan during the week". Which makes her everyone's favourite kind of vegan. :thumbs:


Well ok... I thought she was full vegan.

Fuck her so...
 
That wasn't the insinuation that Harry & Meghan made though; they acknowledged that the brat wouldn't be an HRH until Charlie became king, their gripe is that 'they' were working to remove that from being possible.
Well that's not what strung out is arguing with Sas about ....

strung out said:
You explicitly took issue with the fact that Meghan was upset Archie didn't become a prince when he was born.
 
This is what Sas said: Probably the most nauseating thing for me was the insinuation that their sprog didn't become HRH because of racism.

There's not been any insinuation that the sprog didn't become an HRH, but that he won't become an HRH, due to racism.
 
This whole sorry saga has highlighted once again how dysfunctional the royal family is. The whole institution of monarchy is just bizarre. The individual members can't possibly be happy, they add nothing to the country, and the whole purpose of them seems to be to act as tabloid fodder. The "men in grey suits" as Diana called the institution behind the crumbling ediface, are the only ones getting something out of the crazy set up.
 
Ofcom to investigate Piers Morgan over Meghan comments
Media regulator Ofcom has launched an investigation into Good Morning Britain after receiving more than 41,000 complaints about host Piers Morgan's comments about the Duchess of Sussex.
In her interview with Oprah Winfrey, Meghan said she previously felt like she "didn't want to be alive any more". On Monday, Morgan said he "didn't believe a word" the duchess had said.
 
Back
Top Bottom