Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Peak Oil (was "petroleum geologist explains US war policy")

Country Analysis Briefs - Sudan

OIL
Sudan contains proven reserves of 563 million barrels of oil, more than twice the 262 million barrels estimated in 2001. Because much of Sudanese oil exploration has been limited to the central and south-central regions, Sudanese Energy Ministry representatives estimate proven reserves at 700 million barrels and total reserves at five billion barrels, including potential reserves in northwest Sudan , the Blue Nile Basin , and the Red Sea area in eastern Sudan . Oil production has risen steadily since the completion of an export pipeline in July 1999. Crude oil production averaged 343,000 barrels per day (bbl/d) in 2004, up from 270,000 bbl/d during 2003. In December 2004, Sudanese Energy Minister Awad al-Jaz announced that oil production will likely increase to 500,000 bbl/d in 2005. Sudanese production may reach 750,000 bbl/d by late 2006 if increases in output progress as planned.

http://tinyurl.com/j8d43

==

From the mid-1970s, extensive oil exploration began in Sudan. The US is currently excluded from sharing in Sudan’s oil wealth due to its own embargo, though Chevron previously spent $1.2 billion and discovered oil fields in southern Sudan. The Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung reported in July 1998 that Chevron estimated “Sudan had more oil than Iran and Saudi Arabia together.” It is currently pumping 345,000 barrels per day, and the US Energy Information Administration estimates that reserves just in the oilfields presently being exploited amount to between 660 million and 1.2 billion barrels.(WSWS)
 
Sudanese Energy Ministry representatives estimate proven reserves at 700 million barrels and total reserves at five billion barrels, including potential reserves in northwest Sudan , the Blue Nile Basin , and the Red Sea area in eastern Sudan
700 million barrels proven reserves equals nine days of world supply.
Five billion barrels total reserves equals two months world supply.

In other words - negligible.
 
Falcon said:
700 million barrels proven reserves equals nine days of world supply.
Five billion barrels total reserves equals two months world supply.

In other words - negligible.
And that would be at today's consumption rates, too.
 
Ever get the feeling you're been gouged?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/5402370.stm

Gas traders start giving it away

A glut of natural gas supplies in Britain has seen prices collapse and left traders having to pay for it to be taken off their hands.
Wholesale gas prices for immediate delivery turned negative on Tuesday as supplies surged in from the new Langeled pipeline from Norway.

Britain's gas storage capacity is 96% full so firms need to offload supplies.

As domestic gas bills are based on longer-term contracts, consumers will have to wait for big reductions.

After trading at an average of 26p a therm through September, the spot price for gas delivered immediately fell to -5p during the course of the day, meaning traders are paying to get rid of it.
 
bigfish said:
Bigfish hi (again)

Would you say you understood the dynamics of the interconnector as it applies to UK gas pricing? Do you get the implications of having a pipe that only flows one way connecting an unregulated and a regulated market? How about the consequences of mismatch between storage and peak demand in the UK (the legacy of 10 years of surplus indigenous supply) on spot pricing? What about the motives of traders who get to sell European surplus capacity once, and have to pick the moment to sell that maximises forwaerd transfer yield?

All that said, what connection do you perceive between the local spot price of UK gas today, and the security of the gas supply into the UK over the next 20 years?

In fact, beyong cutting and pasting snippets that I don't think you even understand, do you have any opinion at all on these snippets?
 
Falcon said:
700 million barrels proven reserves equals nine days of world supply.
Five billion barrels total reserves equals two months world supply.

In other words - negligible.

I agree, 700 million and 5 billion barrels is "negligible" in global terms. However, 700mb and 5bln barrels is far from "negligible" in terms of

1. the entities owning the oil, and

2. the country the oil was discovered in.

The leading player in Sudan is China's CNOC. It pumps 7% of China's oil needs from Sudan. As matters stand, the CNOC reserve base can satisfy the current 7% flow rate for another 60 years. In addition, the reserve base is sure to grow considerably larger, given the regions immaturity.

Is that "negligible"?

As for the Sudan. The country is now energy self-sufficiency, has the capacity to substantially increase export revenues and further develop its infrastructure (communications, education, health, etc.,) hopefully, in turn raising its largely impoverished peoples out of the strife torn misery and crippling poverty imperialism would otherwise like to keep them trapped in.

Is that negligible, do you think?
 
For Sudan? No not negligible. But then I thought this was a thread about global oil issues. Please feel free to start a thread about the wonderful future energy self-sufficiency of Sudan, if you think it's an importat topic.
 
bigfish said:
Is that negligible, do you think?
Yes. In point of fact, I think when 295,000,000 Americans realise how unwise it was to build a society dependent entirely and irreversibly on a finite energy source with an unreproducible energy density, I think they will eat little energy-sufficient Sudanese people for breakfast (figuratively speaking).
 
Falcon said:
Well, perhaps not. Perhaps the silliest notion to have been entertained is the suggestion that all genes, micro-organisms, eggs and sperm of lower animals arrived on particles from space less than 100um in diameter. This is the Panspermia theory, devised by ... Fred Hoyle.

Hoyle, by the way, is one of the more respectable champions of BigFish's comical theory.

"The Astrobiology Research Trust in conjunction with Cardiff University consider it an opportune time to review progress in areas of astronomy that were pioneered by Chandra Wickramasinghe, who is continuing as Director of the Cardiff Centre for Astrobiology. From the time of his first monograph on "Interstellar Dust" in 1968 studies of cosmic dust have assumed a pivotal role throughout astronomy. And the panspermia theory pioneered with the late Sir Fred Hoyle has become mainstream in the new science of astrobiology."

http://www.astrobiology.cf.ac.uk/conference.html

;)
 
Texas oil man Jeffrey Brown, a commentator at TheOilDrum.com, the outstanding oil discussion group on the Internet, makes the point that Saudi Arabia is at the same point statistically (in terms of ultimate recoverable reserves) that Texas was at in 1972 when production there peaked. The world's four greatest oil fields are in depletion (Burgan [Kuwait], Daqing [China], Cantarell [Mexico], and Ghawar [Saudi Arabia]) and these have accounted for over 14 percent of the world's oil production. (Ghawar alone accounts for over 60 percent of Saudi Arabia's production.) The North Sea has peaked and production there is "crashing." Venezuela has peaked and its oil is shitty heavy crude. Indonesia (an OPEC member) has peaked and is now a net oil importer. Nigeria's political chaos is making production increasingly difficult-to-impossible. Production in the Canadian tar sands is not making up for losses elsewhere. The US is down to about a four-year supply of conventional crude and condensates while we import 70 percent of the oil we consume. Discovery of new oil (including Chevron's largely hypothetical deepwater "Jack" finds) is barely covering a fraction of the world's consumption. So it goes....
Howard Kunstler, Swan Dive, 9th October

A good summary of where things are at. Read his analysis on what is happening to the world financial market, and what will shortly happen to the U.S. economy lead by the collapse of the mortgage market.
 
The UK's Department of Trade and Industry have updated their statistics (excel) for UK for the prior 12 months.

"Oil production in the period June 2006 to August 2007 was 12.1 per cent lower than a year ago."--DTI
The UK, you will recall, has one of the lowest tax rates in the world. It is one of the few in which oil companies are exposed to the full upside of the oil price (in many, e.g. in Azerbaijan's Caspian, profits are capped above a certain oil price with excesses going to the state). It has a sophisticated infrastructure and highly experienced service industry. The oil price has been 'high' for over two years.

In other words, if there was any truth in the assertion that reserves are a function of technology and oil price, this is where we would be seeing proof in the form of arrested decline rates.

In fact, the effect of oil price and technology has been to accelerate oil production out of this decade into the last decade, increasing present-day decline rates. Meanwhile, much of today's confidence in the sustainability of production is rooted in denial of this phenomenon.
 
A round up of a few articles we've written recently:

On last weeks Energy Institute conference on oil depletion (it must be serious if they are talking about it) I have a summary here:
Energy Institute Oil Depletion Conference

We've also got an extended report on the dramatic revelations IHS Energy presented at the meeting:
IHS IHS Data Suggest Kuwaiti & Global Proved Oil Reserves Lower Than BP Estimates
At the Oil Depletion conference (hosted by the Energy Institute) held in London on 7th November, Dr Kenneth Chew, a Vice President of IHS Energy reported proved and probable reserves (2P) for Kuwait of around 52 billion barrels. This is approximately 51% of the proved reserves reported in the BP statistical review that stand at 101.5 billion barrels. This tends to support recent reports of Kuwaiti reserves being substantially overstated.

Ken Chew also presented data indicating global remaining discovered proved plus probable (2P) liquid resources of some 1,250 billion barrels. This implies global proved liquid reserves (1P) of around 950 billion barrels (based on an assumption that 1P is approximately 75% of 2P). This is substantially lower than estimates provided by BP, Oil & Gas Journal and World Oil.

And on Falcon's quote from the DTI we can also point out that this means UK Oil Production Lowest For 28 Years.

Regards,
Editor, The Oil Drum: Europe
 
Implications of “Peak Oil” for Atmospheric CO2 and Climate

An overview of Dr James Hansen's work on considering realistic reserves for oil and gas with respect to climate change. He concludes that due to approaching peaks it is feasible to keep atmospheric CO2 from exceeding approximately 450ppm as long as coal and unconventional fossil fuels are used responsibly.

Implications of “Peak Oil” for Atmospheric CO2 and Climate
 
250 years of coal?

…think again. I’ve prepared a roundup of the five reports published in the first half of 2007 on the global coal situation. They are all broadly in agreement saying that there is likely to be less coal available than traditionally thought. This throws into doubt continued levels of coal exploitation but also prevents any significant future coal-to-liquids response to oil depletion.

What’s interesting is range of people saying this, the five reports come from four independent research teams, Germany’s Energy Watch Group, European Commission Joint Research Centre, California Institute of Technology and US National Academy of Sciences.

COAL – The Roundup
 
Peak oil means the point where oil production starts to fall ,and even if new oil fields are found the production does not go up, because usually they are too small. The last big discovery was in 1970 in Mexico the giant field Cantarell

From this site :
http://www.eia.doe.gov/iea/res.html it can be seen that there are 1.2 trillion barrels in estimate reserves, untouched oil. At our current rate of consumption of 80 million barrels/ day it will last some 40 years, without taking into account the rise in demand caused by India and China

A good site about peak oil is here :

http://www.lifeaftertheoilcrash.net/

A few images :
image002.gif

peak-oil-vv-001.gif

EnergyCurveHistory3_op_800x203.jpg


We do not need to wait 40 years, the price of oil will rise as soon as the oil production starts to fall, and everything will become too expensive , that means economies will suffer.
Most oil producing countries are past their peak in production, even Saudi Arabia does not seem to be able to increase production now.
In Canada there is a lot of oil but it's trapped in tar sands, very expensive to extract.
What does everybody think about the end of oil ? Myself I don't trust that other forms of energy will save us and I predict economic collapse, anarchy, end of the world, the worse scenario :)
 
paimei01 said:
Peak oil means the point where oil production starts to fall ,and even if new oil fields are found the production does not go up, because usually they are too small. The last big discovery was in 1970 in Mexico the giant field Cantarell

From this site :
http://www.eia.doe.gov/iea/res.html it can be seen that there are 1.2 trillion barrels in estimate reserves, untouched oil. At our current rate of consumption of 80 million barrels/ day it will last some 40 years, without taking into account the rise in demand caused by India and China

A good site about peak oil is here :

http://www.lifeaftertheoilcrash.net/

A few images :
image002.gif

peak-oil-vv-001.gif

EnergyCurveHistory3_op_800x203.jpg


We do not need to wait 40 years, the price of oil will rise as soon as the oil production starts to fall, and everything will become too expensive , that means economies will suffer.
Most oil producing countries are past their peak in production, even Saudi Arabia does not seem to be able to increase production now.
In Canada there is a lot of oil but it's trapped in tar sands, very expensive to extract.
What does everybody think about the end of oil ? Myself I don't trust that other forms of energy will save us and I predict economic collapse, anarchy, end of the world, the worse scenario :)

YOu really are a ray of sunshine
 
Thx :)

The solution as I see it : railroads everywhere with electric trains, nuclear power plants, solar power, wind power, keep the oil for important stuff like : insecticides, fertilisers, medicine, plastic, and use bicycles whenever possible - short trips. But I doubt any of these will be implemented until it's too late.

Why hydrogen is not a solution :
http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/081803_hydrogen_answers.html

Why ethanol is not a solution :
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/bizchina/2007-07/06/content_912170.htm
It should be noted that if the entire US corn crop were converted into ethanol, it would satisfy only 16 percent of US transport needs. The amount of corn that goes into the gas tank of a large automobile could feed one person for a year.
When the market sees that it is more profitable to produce ethanol than sell the grain for food, the food industry will be in trouble. Since ethanol is used as a fuel, its price will be tied to the price of oil. As oil prices climb because of the impending world shortage of oil, ethanol prices will rise. As a consequence food prices will rise as well.

Ethanol is not oil, the plants used do not grow in one day, also they require energy , fertilisers and other stuff to grow and process. From corn you get less energy than you put in. From hemp or sugar cane you get 2 times the energy. People make ethanol from corn because it is subsidized, but it's not a smart thing to do


This shows why wasting corn helps nobody, only some farmers :
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/6283992.stm
In its report, the IEA argued that biofuel production would hit 1.8 million barrels by 2012, more than double 2006 levels.

Today we used 80 million barrels of oil. 1.8 million barrels by 2012 is nothing. Ethanol can be a good thing if it's made from hemp or sugar cane or something else but not grains. Look what problems this ethanol hoax is creating :

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/article2697788.ece
Mexico was ablaze in late January. Just two months after the election of Felipe Calderon as Mexico's President, protests had broken out across the country.

Thousands of people were marching on the main cities calling on their pro-free trade businessman President to halt a phenomenon threatening the lives of millions of Mexicans.
The reason for such a substantial increase in the price lay north of the border. In order to wean itself off its addiction to oil, the US was turning to biofuels made from industrial corn like never before. Farmers in Mexico and America had been replacing edible corn crops with industrial corn that could then be processed into biofuels, leading to a decrease in the amount corn available on the open market.
 
Mexico stuff: This is just the beginning of the sort of worldwide upheavals to come.
 
'Peak oil' doomsayers fall silent as reserves grow ever larger

NEIL REYNOLDS

OTTAWA -- You will have noticed the marked decline these days in the number of "peak oil" people making cataclysmic pronouncements. Global oil production set records throughout 2006 -- for all-time highest production day, month, quarter and year. For the single-year record, production reached 31.3 Gb (billion barrels), an average of 85.2 million barrels a day. Affirming the trend, production set a new global single-day record before the end of January, 2007.

Along with record-setting production came record-setting increases in reserves -- moving "peak oil" deeper into the century and ultimately beyond.

The "peak oil" hypothesis, relentlessly propounded for decades, holds that the world has passed (or will momentarily pass) the highest point it can ever reach in oil production -- at the halfway mark in the depletion of global oil resources. It holds that this imminent peak necessarily marks the start of an irreversible decline in production. It holds, in other words, that the end of oil is nigh. The principal problem is that the hypothesis is demonstrably wrong -- and is vigorously proven wrong year after year.

In 1979, the "life-index" of global oil reserves was calculated as 35 years -- suggesting, superficially, that known oil reserves could support the current level of production only through 2007. In 2003, after decades of accelerated production, this index had risen to 40 years. It has now risen further to 45 years -- moving us safely through mid-century. Indeed, the record-setting oil production last year marked the umpteenth consecutive year that "peak oil" theorists have found it necessary once again to run the numbers and once again to postpone the end time of oil.

It was in 1989 that Colin Campbell, the prominent Irish champion of "peak oil," proclaimed that the global peak had already occurred -- a declaration he found it expedient, almost immediately, to amend; "peak oil," he said, would instead occur in 1995. He now opts for 2010. Yet global oil production, since 1989, has risen by 20 per cent (13.8 million barrels a day), global oil supply by 28 per cent (18.9 million barrels a day).

The production records set last year were significant for a number of other "peak oil" prophets, including Marion King Hubbert himself, the American geophysicist who devised "peak oil" analysis in the mid-fifties and who accurately predicted that U.S. oil production would peak in 1979. In 1956, he determined that global oil would peak "in about 50 years" -- in other words, 2006. At the pinnacle, he said, the world would consume 12 Gb of oil a year.

In 2004, Mr. Campbell increased this number, almost doubling it, to 23 Gb. For his part, Texas oilman T. Boone Pickens has held that oil would peak at 30 Gb -- a level exceeded last year.

Yet the world's most comprehensive measure of oil resources keeps right on growing -- higher, yes, but at a faster pace as well. TrendLines, the Canadian statistical research company, confirms this assertion in its February report on URR -- "ultimate recoverable reserves." In an analysis of optimum reserves, TrendLines concludes that the world's URR is now increasing, depending on the period you select for comparison, at twice or thrice its historical pace. From 1957 through 2006, it says, URR grew at an average annual rate of 2.4 per cent.

From 1979, it grew at an average annual rate of 4.2 per cent. From 2000, it grew at an average annual rate of 6 per cent. "Peak oil" prophet Mr. Campbell, TrendLines says, has underestimated the actual rise in URR by tenfold.

In 2000, the U.S. Geological Service (USGS) calculated that global URR would increase by 2.4 per cent a year for the foreseeable future -- rising from 1,669 billion barrels in 1995 to 3,345 billion barrels in 2025. (A billion barrels -- one Gb -- is roughly the amount of oil that the U.S. keeps in its Strategic Petroleum Reserve.) "Peak oil" proponents dismissed the USGS analysis as impossibly optimistic. As with all apocalyptic manifestations, peaks must necessarily be imminent. Yet the forecast has proven significantly understated.

Driven by smart technology, global URR now increases each year at unprecedented rates. It has now (December, 2006) reached 3,288 Gb, not far off the USGS calculation for 2025. It increased last year by 114 Gb, compared with a historical annual average increase of 47 Gb. Sustained at this rate for another 20 years, the world's ultimately recoverable oil could increase by another two-thirds to 5,568 Gb, or three times the resource when "peak oil" proclamations began. Assuming consumption of 30 Gb a year, this URR could sustain production for something approaching 200 years. Once again, the end is not nigh.

Link (subscription required): http://www.theglobeandmail.com/serv...eason=2&denial_reasons=none&force_login=false
 
Times Online said:
July 16, 2007

Sterling and oil advance into record territory

The pound is worth $2.04, a 26-year high, and Brent crude soars to $78.40 in London amid fears over tight supply
Rhys Blakely and Agencies

The price of oil tested record highs in London today, amid heavy speculative buying and concerns over tight US fuel supplies.

Crude's ascent was mirrored in the foreign exchange markets, where the pound climbed to $2.04, a 26-year high for sterling against the greenback.

The dollar looked to be weighed down by continued jitters over the US housing market, soft US retail sales data from Friday and fears over today's Empire State manufacturing survey for July, which is expected to show a pullback in the sector in the US.

Meanwhile, Brent North Sea crude for August delivery hit $78.40 in London, within a whisker of the record, $78.64. set on August 9, 2006, when a pipeline spill forced BP to close production from Prudhoe Bay, the biggest oil field in the US.
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/natural_resources/article2084502.ece


Also of interest:

Times Online said:
July 13, 2007

Iran demands oil pay in yen not dollars

The dollar fell against the yen this afternoon on reports Iran has asked Japan to stop paying for its oil in dollars
Robert Lindsay

The dollar was driven down against the Japanese yen this afternoon, hit by the news that Iran had asked Japan to pay for its oil purchases in the Japanese currency and not in dollars.

Iran has sent a letter to Japanese refiners, signed by Ali A Arshi, the general manager of crude marketing and exports for Iran's national Iranian Oil Company, according to a report by Bloomberg.

The letter asks for yen payments "for any/all of your forthcoming Iranian crude oil liftings." The request is for all shipments "effective immediately".

Japan's oil payments to Iran rose 12 per cent last year to 1.24 trillion yen (£5 billion).

The yen dropped against the dollar initially coming down to below 120 from 122.40 but later recovered somewhat on strong consumer confidence data from the US.

Iran has been deliberately moving its exposure to the dollar and dollar-based assets, faced with the threat that the US could freeze its US-based dollar accounts in response to its nuclear plans.

Three big oil producing nations — Iran, Venezuela and Russia — have all been moving much of their foreign currency reserves from dollars to euros in recent months.
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/natural_resources/article2070938.ece

Watch the birdy...
 
bigfish said:
Global oil production set records throughout 2006 -- for all-time highest production day, month, quarter and year. For the single-year record, production reached 31.3 Gb (billion barrels), an average of 85.2 million barrels a day. Affirming the trend, production set a new global single-day record before the end of January, 2007.

How can I square that with this:

http://europe.theoildrum.com/node/2768
Crude oil - Production of crude oil increased by 181,000 b/d from March to April. Total production in April was estimated at 73.40 million b/d by the Energy Information Administration (EIA), which is 850,000 b/d lower than all time high crude oil production of 74.25 million b/d reached in December 2005.

Who's telling the truth?
 
bigfish said:
...Along with record-setting production came record-setting increases in reserves -- moving "peak oil" deeper into the century and ultimately beyond.

In 1979, the "life-index" of global oil reserves was calculated as 35 years -- suggesting, superficially, that known oil reserves could support the current level of production only through 2007. In 2003, after decades of accelerated production, this index had risen to 40 years. It has now risen further to 45 years -- moving us safely through mid-century. Indeed, the record-setting oil production last year marked the umpteenth consecutive year that "peak oil" theorists have found it necessary once again to run the numbers and once again to postpone the end time of oil.

....Yet the world's most comprehensive measure of oil resources keeps right on growing -- higher, yes, but at a faster pace as well. TrendLines, the Canadian statistical research company, confirms this assertion in its February report on URR -- "ultimate recoverable reserves." In an analysis of optimum reserves, TrendLines concludes that the world's URR is now increasing, depending on the period you select for comparison, at twice or thrice its historical pace. From 1957 through 2006, it says, URR grew at an average annual rate of 2.4 per cent.

From 1979, it grew at an average annual rate of 4.2 per cent. From 2000, it grew at an average annual rate of 6 per cent. "Peak oil" prophet Mr. Campbell, TrendLines says, has underestimated the actual rise in URR by tenfold.

In 2000, the U.S. Geological Service (USGS) calculated that global URR would increase by 2.4 per cent a year for the foreseeable future -- rising from 1,669 billion barrels in 1995 to 3,345 billion barrels in 2025. (A billion barrels -- one Gb -- is roughly the amount of oil that the U.S. keeps in its Strategic Petroleum Reserve.) "Peak oil" proponents dismissed the USGS analysis as impossibly optimistic. As with all apocalyptic manifestations, peaks must necessarily be imminent. Yet the forecast has proven significantly understated.

Driven by smart technology, global URR now increases each year at unprecedented rates. It has now (December, 2006) reached 3,288 Gb, not far off the USGS calculation for 2025. It increased last year by 114 Gb, compared with a historical annual average increase of 47 Gb. Sustained at this rate for another 20 years, the world's ultimately recoverable oil could increase by another two-thirds to 5,568 Gb, or three times the resource when "peak oil" proclamations began. Assuming consumption of 30 Gb a year, this URR could sustain production for something approaching 200 years. Once again, the end is not nigh.

Link (subscription required): http://www.theglobeandmail.com/serv...eason=2&denial_reasons=none&force_login=false
Notice the focus on 'reserves' or URR which are frequently quoted by those who either deny peak oil or consider that it will occur far into the future. The flaw in this argument is that it is flowrates, not reserves which really count i.e. how quickly will the earth give up deposits in future taking into account scientific limits and especially net energy return.
 
FT. March 12 2007

Luis Giusti: "If we believe the demand predictions of IEA and even if we discount them by say 20 per cent, the challenge in terms of supply of oil and gas is huge. Although many people talk about peak oil that is not the real issue, because if you take the proven reserves of 1.3 trillion barrels we have 28 years of oil and if you add the probable and get to 2.2 trillion barrels we have 48 years.

The real issue is if those reserves will be available to meet the predicted demand. Will independent oil companies and national oil companies be able to do the job? What are the risks for the capitals to be invested? In almost every exercise at the end the missing volume is assumed to come from Saudi Arabia (18 to 20 millionb/d). Is that in the best interest of Saudi Arabia?"
 
Haha! "The issue is not peak oil" "The issue is exactly what peak oil is about, but we'll call it something else"
Priceless :)
 
Another recent Times piece that belies 'Niel Reynolds' first line:

The Times said:
July 16, 2007

Are these the last days of the Oil Age?...

..Last Tuesday the lead story in The Financial Times was the latest report from the International Energy Agency. The FT quoted the IEA as saying: “Oil looks extremely tight in five years’ time,” and that there are “prospects of even tighter natural gas markets at the turn of the decade”. For an international agency, that is inflammatory language. This steep rise in the oil price over a four-year period has been caused by demand rising at more than 2 per cent a year, while supplies had risen more slowly, by a healthy 4.1 per cent in 2004, but by only 1.25 per cent in 2005 and 0.5 per cent in 2006.

This has revived the “oil peak” debate among oil analysts. Some analysts believe that the world will never again be able to pump as much oil as we are pumping at present.

Peter Warburton’s excellent weekly risk analysis has pointed out that 27 of the 51 oil-producing nations listed in BP’s Statistical Review of World Energy reported output declines in 2006. One projection of world crude oil production actually forecasts a 10 per cent reduction in total world output between 2005 and 2015. That would be a revolution...
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/william_rees_mogg/article2080497.ece

That lead story from Tuesday 10th: World facing oil ‘supply crunch’ as demand soars, agency warns.

...and here's the predictably retarded 'response'.
 
Backatcha Bandit Also of interest: [url said:
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/natural_resources/article2070938.ece[/url]


Like the comment below it on the Tiome site:

"We need to invade Iran and level it. We must show that this attack on the US Currency will not go unchecked. We must show the world that what happened to Iraq will happen to any country that challenges the petro dollar. We have used inflation to tax the world to build the most fearsome military machine that the world has seen, this machine is hungry and must be fed.

Max Silverstein
Homeland Security

Max Silverstein, Washington DC, USA"
 
Back
Top Bottom