Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Palm: Pre, webOS & app discussion

I see. So does that mean the Pre's is superior to the iPhone's, 3G-wise.

Possibly. You'd need a more scientific test to say for sure.

(e2a: Comparing 'Bars' alone isn't sufficient. There is no standard for number of bars, vs. signal. Rendering speed is also problematic. Different processors, different compilations of the Web Kit renderer - from anecdotal reports, I suspect the Pre renders faster. A bandwidth test would probably be the least flawed method of determining effectiveness of the RF receiver system.)
 
The reception and sound on my Pre is a whole load better than my T-Mobile G1.

That could be because you have better coverage where you are. I stood with my iPhone in hand and tested the loading of a web page against the Pre and it was baffling!
 
OK. So here's where the Pre has absolutely blown me away. I just had a call from Pier Gibbons (from these very boards). After the call, I thought I'd save his number, so clicked the '+' icon next to his number and typed in his name.

Immediately, the Pre linked together his Facebook account (and an old contacts entry I'd forgotten about) and added his photo and his email address so I've now got his full profile in my address book. Very impressive.
 
OK. So here's where the Pre has absolutely blown me away. I just had a call from Pier Gibbons (from these very boards). After the call, I thought I'd save his number, so clicked the '+' icon next to his number and typed in his name.

Immediately, the Pre linked together his Facebook account (and an old contacts entry I'd forgotten about) and added his photo and his email address so I've now got his full profile in my address book. Very impressive.

Its very impressive, but I've been doing that with Touch Flow and WinMo for quite some time now, its a great feature.

Only just released the other day its grabbed everyone's birthdays from Facebook and put them in my Outlook Calendar as well.
 
OK. So here's where the Pre has absolutely blown me away. I just had a call from Pier Gibbons (from these very boards). After the call, I thought I'd save his number, so clicked the '+' icon next to his number and typed in his name.

Immediately, the Pre linked together his Facebook account (and an old contacts entry I'd forgotten about) and added his photo and his email address so I've now got his full profile in my address book. Very impressive.

There is an android app for that, which I had when I first got my Magic. I've since deleted it, and been looking for it for months! To have it native would be great.

My brother bought a pre home form work yesterday, must say I was very impressed it it, was a pleasure to use.
 
I love my Pre, I would lick it after dropping it in the toilet I would. However what I don't like about my Pre:

- Dialling a number is on permanent loudspeaker. wtf. BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP. Not surprised if I wake up the neighbours.

- Similarly, if I am unfortunately on the phone to someone and at the same time I get a text, dear christ the text alert is also on loudspeaker and one of these days my eardrum won't take it anymore and it will burst.

- There's no autocorrection while texting/emailing. Although the keyboard is much better than my ex iphone/G1, I'm not perfect and I wouldn't mind this little feature.

- Yeah it's great synching my Facebook contacts to my phonebook. However although I like all 300 of my friends, I only really speak on the phone with a fraction of them. That's a lot of needless scrolling Palm.

There's other 'bugs', I'll post them as I recall them. Anyone else have a similar list?
 
I hate the idea of EVERYTHING synching in terms of friends off social network sites and numbers, email addresses, I prefer tings separate, why do manufacturers think that this is a good idea? We don't necessarily communicate with EVERYONE via texts/emails/facespace...some you communicate with more than others, and using one or more medium, and wouldn't like the fact that someone has decided that social networking sites should dominate our lives :facepalm:
 
I don't get why it has to be all or nothing, why can't you choose which contacts from each service you'd like synced?
 
I hate the idea of EVERYTHING synching in terms of friends off social network sites and numbers, email addresses, I prefer tings separate, why do manufacturers think that this is a good idea? We don't necessarily communicate with EVERYONE via texts/emails/facespace...some you communicate with more than others, and using one or more medium, and wouldn't like the fact that someone has decided that social networking sites should dominate our lives :facepalm:
For me it's an absolutely brilliant idea and it's proved invaluable already. But then, my Facebook account isn't full of hundreds of people I don't know. The ability to manually link contacts is very useful too.

- Dialling a number is on permanent loudspeaker. wtf. BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP. Not surprised if I wake up the neighbours.
Just turn off the speaker (switch on top) and the dialling is silent.
- Yeah it's great synching my Facebook contacts to my phonebook. However although I like all 300 of my friends, I only really speak on the phone with a fraction of them. That's a lot of needless scrolling Palm.
Why not open the keyboard and start typing the name? You don't even need to have any apps open top start searching.
 
Just an update to say I'm still *really* loving my Pre - it makes my Android G1 feel very outdated in terms of performance and interface, and althoughugh we're still waiting on a major system update before the full App Store becomes available, I haven't found myself missing much.

Seems to be doing OK in the States too, where it's now the sixth best selling smartphone.

http://www.precentral.net/pre-moving-world-6-smartphone-q3-2009
 
I'm doing the homebrew thing as we speak. Stuck on the installation bit though, when asked what type of webosdoctor to download. Is it "Sprint", "Bell" or "Don't Care - Emulator". I've gone for the last one:hmm:
 
Yeah I blazed through anyway and have installed a couple of things. Tell you what, it's a whole new Pre world out there! Apps make a smartphone, and finally I have access to more than a pathetic few!
 
The choice above only applies if you intend using the "panic button" in webOSquickinstall.

If you download the correct webosdoctor image from palm via the jnlp link, rename it to webosdoctor.jar and drop it in the same directory as webOSquickinstall.jar then you don't get asked.

To get webosdoctor, head to http://palm.com/ROM, tell it your palm is borked, select the correct image (O2 for UK). It will then prompt you for your serial number before letting you download the jnlp file to start the webosdoctor application.

At least this time Palm have made the S/N returned via software the same as the one inside the case ;)
 
I know bugger all about mobile app development, but an awful lot of people seem to be getting excited about Palm's new Ares software development package which has hit beta.



Breaking tradition from Mojo -- Palm's other webOS SDK -- the big news with Ares is that the dev environment is fully web-based with no additional tools needed for apps to get whipped into reality. Not only does that make getting started a breeze (theoretically, anyway), but Palm thinks that this is the way to bring mobile development to a whole new category of folks who may not come from traditional dev backgrounds -- they want to pull in web geeks who've got the ideas and design experience but not necessarily the hardcore coding background that you'd normally need to take the next Air Hockey to production

http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/palms-ares-sdk-goes-to-public-beta/
User comment:
Compared to a lot of things, though, this is definitely easy! I have been trying it out just now, and I have to say:

I am just absolutely floored at how well it works. A full application development suite based in the browser. This is what people have been talking about when they gush over the possibilities of HTML5. Someone went and did it and it's Palm.
 
That looks pretty shit I must say. I have a minor thing about flash looking dev tools. They are tools, not games.

Its JavaScript. The worst development language ever created. So bad is it that Google have created a tool that takes Java and turns it into JavaScript.
 
Why is something that makes it easy for less techie types to create apps 'shit'? It's not like most of the mobile phone apps currently created are particularly good or complex. I'd imagine there's loads of people with good ideas but not enough experience of a proper coding environment who may enjoy using this - and the more people having a go at app writing the better, surely?

Heck, even I might give it a go.
 
I'd prefer them to put the effort into making a tool worth using rather than making it look pretty. Every single 'pretty' dev tool I have ever used in (gulp) 30 years of using computers has been totally abysmal and so lacking in basic functionality that you nearly immediately hit its limits trying to to do basic stuff.

Its a dev tool, dev tools shouldn't look flash. Look at Visual Studio, its been pretty much the same for 15 years now, has no peer as it does what it does so brilliantly its amazing. Its no beginners tool.

To make the Pre work, its all JS CSS and HTML. So all you need to get started is notepad and a good book on JavaScript and the Pre SDK documentation. No flashy tools required. However much I dislike JS its still a fully (dis) functional language with so many horrible knots in that you need to be really on your game to get it to do what you want reliably.
 
I'd prefer them to put the effort into making a tool worth using rather than making it look pretty. Every single 'pretty' dev tool I have ever used in (gulp) 30 years of using computers has been totally abysmal and so lacking in basic functionality that you nearly immediately hit its limits trying to to do basic stuff.

Its a dev tool, dev tools shouldn't look flash. Look at Visual Studio, its been pretty much the same for 15 years now, has no peer as it does what it does so brilliantly its amazing. Its no beginners tool.

To make the Pre work, its all JS CSS and HTML. So all you need to get started is notepad and a good book on JavaScript and the Pre SDK documentation. No flashy tools required. However much I dislike JS its still a fully (dis) functional language with so many horrible knots in that you need to be really on your game to get it to do what you want reliably.
I don't understand your argument: tech bods already have the tools to create complex apps, but this tool gives newbies an easier way in, and if they show an aptitude for producing apps, they can just learn more as they go along.

As a consumer, I don't give a shit how an app was made - all I care about is: is it useful/fun/productive.
 
I have a minor thing about flash looking dev tools.

Me too. In general, the "cooler" they look, the more useless they are.

The Visual Studio example is a good one. And there are parallels outside of coding. Things like Photoshop and Quark XPress do not look "cool". There's no reason they need to.
 
Back
Top Bottom