Well, compared to the other US Presidents, he's relatively peaceful
Still, after kissinger they might as well hand out nobel peace prizes free with Frosties
what's 'relatively peaceful'??? you either are peaceful or you are not. there is no such thing as relative peace...
I dunno, in this day and age relative peace probably the best you can hope for. Not actually being able the hear the shots being fired, your only contribution to the war effort being your wages and welfare programs, the odd scuffle in the SU when Giles says our boys are brave and should be applauded and you disagree and so it's outside for fisticuff where Giles kicks you in the nuts before you start and everyone laughs.
I haven't read the justification myself, but isn't it more about intentions more than achievements this time? Whilst I don't think that is particularly effective, I can understand the reasoning.
What the fuck for exactly?
And no, 'being black' just isn't going to cut it this time
I reckon everyone in the world bar a few million people have done more for world peace than Lord Obama. I certainly have. Most/all people here have as well.
fair enough, but Obama still leads and represents an empire at war, a superpower trying to reshuffle the world order to its advantage without giving a fuck about basic human rights. the idea behind modern america is expansion, neo-imperialism, and securing markets and resources for its own good and its own future. obama agreed to represent and lead america when he was sworn in and is no revolutionary who cares about the well-being of everybody on this planet. he was and is aware of modern day economies and the need for america to fight wars to remain the super power it is. therefor, in the case of obama and america there is, imo, no 'relatively peaceful'.
Agreed. I was just being weird.
This really makes me sick. He has done nothing and just turned up on the scene. It cheapens the prize as a whole. Maybe it's just a joke? It must be.
Well look - he's not invaded anywhere new. Yet.
Yeah, if not starting any wars for a while makes a US president relatively peaceful, by that reckoning, I've not done it for a while, does that make me relatively a virgin?what's 'relatively peaceful'??? you either are peaceful or you are not. there is no such thing as relative peace...
^This.What a joke - I reckon the committee must have just wanted to thumb their noses at Bush and Cheney a little.
Well look - he's not invaded anywhere new. Yet.
^This.
I can't remember, and I'm on my mobile so can't Google, did Blair get one for Northern Ireland?
Yeah, if not starting any wars for a while makes a US president relatively peaceful, by that reckoning, I've not done it for a while, does that make me relatively a virgin?
Yeah, if not starting any wars for a while makes a US president relatively peaceful, by that reckoning, I've not done it for a while, does that make me relatively a virgin?
Yeah, if not starting any wars for a while makes a US president relatively peaceful, by that reckoning, I've not done it for a while, does that make me relatively a virgin?
Is this the first Noble peace prize given to someone in charge of a country that is killing people?
I don't think Arafat, Rabin and Peres were completely innocent of similar accusations.