belboid
Exasperated, not angry.
what a bunch of utter wankers. How very dare a band try and include some of their new stuff.[The crowd] actually ended up booing.
what a bunch of utter wankers. How very dare a band try and include some of their new stuff.[The crowd] actually ended up booing.
"special" in the sense of "even worse than his usual apalling harmonica playing"? Do you live in opposite land?. I really liked the harmonica intro - that was kinda special.
here's my theory. he's not really a "singer" but an actor. he is never quite himself in his song, not like a say Damon Alburn is, or a Thom Yorke. There's never really a sense of "oh this is dylan singing about dylan's life". There's always an element of distance between Dylan and teh actual "person" in teh song. But rather than an actor, he sort of embodies this new person flawlessy so you don't get the sense of Dylan>acting>person in teh song. he just presents the new formation (and that song is a great example of that). that's why a lot of people say he is a ventrilloqist. He is so insincere that he is sincere. Maybe because his voice is "shit" on any objective measure, means he has to overcompensate by putting on an act. His talent is so strong thought that the "acted" is seemlessly real.
now send that off to pseuds corner for christs sake. but that's my theory after decades of on and off spell bound listening. there's something utterly weird about the bloke.
quite a few open mics are blessed with older blokes with guitars with similar levels of ability. although they do tend to make more of an effort.Anyone making anything like this today? Nothing remotely.
You must like Mr Tambourine Man, everyone likes that.quite a few open mics are blessed with older blokes with guitars with similar levels of ability. although they do tend to make more of an effort.
All i can say is "Thank fuck for the Byrds".You must like Mr Tambourine Man, everyone likes that.
(I do anyway )
"special" in the sense of "even worse than his usual apalling harmonica playing"? Do you live in opposite land?
As for the song - its alright, bit of a dirge - think he did far better stuff during that period.
Judas!The lengths Dylan fans go to excuse his shite singing and harmonica playing and the last 30 years of consitantly terrible live performances is laughable.
Its not that he sings like a tortured seal who sounds exactly the fucking same on every song. Its not that he parps on the harp like a three year with a cracker toy. Its not that when he does gigs he doesnt give a fuck about making the slightest effort for his audience .
No no no - all this is in fact just yet more evidence of the genius of his bobness. Confounding expectations, remainging notions of what we expect from music, communicating on a plane that us mere mortals cannot comprehend.
Nobody over the age of 4 - no.. He's pushing the instrument to it's limits and that will divide people as it's all off key. I approve of that. Nobody else does it like that.
"you're a liar!" etcJudas!
Play it fucking loud!"you're a liar!" etc
I'm not a fan, but his voice/singing is great. A lot of folk singers sound very sincere, very direct. With Dylan there's a casual biting distance and consequent understated emotional complexity. Paul Simon for example was seriously jealous of his voice. I totally get why he was revolutionary in his time.