Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Misc steam railway, traction, station and rail-related news

On a more cheerful after reading the last few de3pressing posts Crich Tramway Museum has started a long overdue restoration of London Transport/LCC No1 to appear in original "Bluebird" livery
 
Last edited:
When Crich have finished that ^^^, they can do Newcastle 102 and a replica of a true Middleton Tram (not a Feltham ie Met331/Sunderland100.

May add something ...
 
When Crich have finished that ^^^, they can do Newcastle 102 and a replica of a true Middleton Tram (not a Feltham ie Met331/Sunderland100.

May add something ...

Ah well a Swansea and Oystermouth one would do fine [Two would be even better and you could MU them] if you are gonna start talking tram reproductions !!
 
Trying to work out if this had already been posted, but failing ...
so.

Four youths appear to have been responsible for arson damage to "Olive"
ie DB998901 Olive (overhead line inspection vehicle) built by Drewry in 1950.
Hopefully, as although severe the destruction wasn't complete, the owning group will be able to reconstruct her.
 
When Crich have finished that ^^^, they can do Newcastle 102 and a replica of a true Middleton Tram (not a Feltham ie Met331/Sunderland100.

May add something ...

I have a feeling that constructing a true replica might be complicated, as it would have to meet current construction standards.

if it's a restoration (even if there's not a huge amount of the original left since it's rusted / rotted to bits - which is likely to be the case with LCC No. 1) then this isn't a problem.
 
I have a feeling that constructing a true replica might be complicated, as it would have to meet current construction standards.

if it's a restoration (even if there's not a huge amount of the original left since it's rusted / rotted to bits - which is likely to be the case with LCC No. 1) then this isn't a problem.

Not exactly, a modern design has to met the regs, but a copy of something previous can be built, provided you can prove that you have the appropriate knowledge ie explain why you are using old design.

Having said that, when a certain N Wales narrow gauge railway was attempting to produce a wheelchair compliant vehicle a few years ago, the problem was that the required turning circle exceeded that railway's loading envelope ... that took some sorting out - getting *someone* to sign off the design was difficult, "But the rules say X ..." vs "but X is wider than the carriage ... " went back and forth several times !
 
Bit of a sad mishap down at the RHDR at the weekend, still no serious damage to people done and driver was a bit of a hero
Romney, Hythe and Dymchurch train crash driver praised - BBC News

rail.jpg
 
Yes, jumped clear right at the last minute then made sure all pasengers were safe. Lucky it wasn't worse, a driver died a few years ago.

As for that picture.. What a shot that shows how uneven the rails are and bonus points for a cat in the shot!!
 
What is it with tractors and narrow / minmum gauge railways ... the tractors seem to have a death wish !
 
hmmm.
The BBC were being a bit sensationalist about risks from the loco boiler, in that report.

Fair play to the driver, there was some quick thinking / reactions displayed.

Hope all recover quickly.

"Green Goddess" may need *some* repair work.
I wonder if they'll want "Typhoon" back from L'all Ratty ? Luckily it is towards the end of the main season ...
 
That looks like there is some shingle in the ballast, a known problem. But the zoom / foreshortening on that shot is probably exaggerating the situation. You are looking at quite lightweight track - compared to the profile for standard main-line weight rail - and 15" gauge at that. Having said that, I was last there more than a decade ago, and my memory of the carriages then was a good ride, even on the shingle at Dungeness.
 
nice picture of Waterloo Station, Feb 1911, posted on tweeter by robnitm

Cv5HgDeWIAAUBAz.jpg


Photographer is standing on the corner of Alaska Street looking west across Waterloo Road - current street view here

the bridge leading to the left of the photo at that time carried a railway line that connected Waterloo (main) with what's now Waterloo East (the bridge is still there, the rail line was removed around the time of WW1)

Waterloo Station was substantially rebuilt after WW1.

Bus is a London Central bus operating Chalk Farm - Camberwell, part of today's route 168. One similar bus (1908 Leyland X type - now restored and working) is in captivity

web_leylandtypebus.jpg
 
nice picture of Waterloo Station, Feb 1911, posted on tweeter by robnitm

Cv5HgDeWIAAUBAz.jpg


Photographer is standing on the corner of Alaska Street looking west across Waterloo Road - current street view here

the bridge leading to the left of the photo at that time carried a railway line that connected Waterloo (main) with what's now Waterloo East (the bridge is still there, the rail line was removed around the time of WW1)

Waterloo Station was substantially rebuilt after WW1.

Bus is a London Central bus operating Chalk Farm - Camberwell, part of today's route 168. One similar bus (1908 Leyland X type - now restored and working) is in captivity

web_leylandtypebus.jpg
They really did build them monumental in those days. :)
 
They really did build them monumental in those days. :)

Yes and no.

From what I have read, parts of (pre WW1) Waterloo station were a bit ramshackle - it was three buildings (see opening bits of 'Three Men in a Boat') with only one being monumental. At one stage at least, Waterloo had been intended as an intermediate station with the line continuing to the edge of the City (I think they got as far as planning a line to a terminus near Southwark Bridge) - in the end the LSWR built the Waterloo & City Line instead.

Waterloo was a great station for Eurostar - named after a battle against the French, and featuring the Victory Arch to commemorate WW1 :hmm:

43434.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom