Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Mayday 2001 Oxford Circus - HoL rules no false imprisonment

The House of Lords ruled yesterday that the detention of thousands of people for several hours at Oxford Circus on 1st May 2001 was not a breach of any rights.

tl;dr: "Anyone on the streets must be taken to be consenting to the possibility of being confined by the police."

The full judgment:
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200809/ldjudgmt/jd090128/austin-1.htm

See here for the earlier judgments:
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2007/989.html
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2005/480.html


Where abouts is that bit about consenting to the possibilty of being confiend by the police, i tried doing a text search but could not find it in the ruling.
 
Which was the Mayday Guerilla Gardening on Parliament Square (2000?) and which was Mayfair Monopoly (2001?).
1999 - "the party line" - RTS attempt to fill the circle line in solidarity with tube workers, police take them express to Clapham for the cannabisfest.
2000 - "guerrilla gardening" - RTS dig up parliament square, Turkish Stalinists graf the cenotaph.
2001 - "mayday monopoly" - Swappies and liberals detained at Oxford Circus, much rioting elsewhere.
2002 - "mayfair mayday" - Womble7 trial, decentralised stuff all over, cops attack street party in Soho in the evening, most people go on TUC march.
2003 - "weapons of mass construction" - some decentralised stuff, main groups corralled and marched to Traf Sq to join the TUC, which had been hijacked by STWC
 
Don't know the details of the Mayday Monopoly but weren't the police just trying to stop Mayfair and West End getting smashed up.
Rather let down by them being too busy holding people at Oxford Circus to do anything about the West End getting smashed up.
 
wtf?

So basically, if you leave your house you are implicitly obliged to accept that you may be held by the police without charge for as long as they like with no access to food, water, toilet facilities etc.

Adds a whole new meaning to the expression Social Contract. So there it is, we are now officially and undeniably a Police State.

Indeed, this is bollox.
 
Where abouts is that bit about consenting to the possibilty of being confiend by the police, i tried doing a text search but could not find it in the ruling.
Paragraph 61, Lord Neuberger, a former investment banker.
 
Full quote there is:
it seems to me that the confinement in the present case could be justified on the basis that anyone on the streets, particularly on a demonstration with a well-known risk of serious violence, must be taken to be consenting to the possibility of being confined by the police, if it is a reasonable and proportionate way of preventing serious public disorder and violence.
Which is not quite as bad as your misquote in the first post. Not that I'm defending the decision. But if you're going to attack it you've got to attack it on the right basis.
 
It's not a misquote, it's an abbreviation.

It's a misleading abbreviation then. And if you do abbreviate quotes like that you should put in [...] to show you've taken chunks out. If you want to be honest that is.

I'm on your side. I just don't think that kind of thing helps.
 
It's not misleading, it is precisely what he says.

The additional context/caveats are only about how this policy applies in this particular instance.
 
Which was the Mayday Guerilla Gardening on Parliament Square (2000?) and which was Mayfair Monopoly (2001?). Genuinely can't remember, but I may have some helpful info if you want to PM me.

Also - so joining a demo is accepting the sins of others, is it? Like joining the Bench as a judge is taking joint responsibility for all the judge who get accused - but never done for - kerb crawling, soliciting and kiddy fiddling?
guerilla gardening was 2000, monopoly was 2001... though I missed the monopoly due to being a good boy as I still had 6 months of my conditional discharge to go from getting bored (in the ultimate non-violent way) in the 2000 trafalgar square kettle...
 
Paragraph 61, Lord Neuberger, a former investment banker.

Thanks, it's a tautological argument he uses though. Because the police confine people, by placing yourself in a situation where they are likely to confine you are consenting...

So in Zimbabwe where the police beat people on protests, if I was going on a protest would I be consenting to their beating me?
 
Livingstone gave the green light to very heavy tactics on the day as he realised that there were very few votes available to him from most of the people attending the day. I can remember on of his peeps being at a very poorly attended session in the 2000 pre-mayday conference on Holloway road. I had wandered in by accident and made my excuses and left sharpish. I am sure it filtered back to him that he was likely to get more votes from people worried about a days shopping being disrupted than a days protest being destroyed. In 2001 the whole situation had been hyped up by the standard, the Guardian and Livingstone to absurd degrees. Can anyone remember the reports of preparations being made by samurai sword wielding squads of protesters and of Hackney based training camps?

The fact that a LSE student SWP group moved, very noisily, towards Oxford circus at 2pm has always seemed suspicious to me. It all seemed too choreographed. Once people started following them they were ushered by the Police into the Circus where they were kept for hours. Not a pretty site at all seeing young friends shivering in the drizzle with no toilets. Pissing crouched against a wall. Teenage girls crying. Pretty fucking horrible in fact. Most people at the time thought that it would be declared illegal once it reached the Courts. just shows what has happened in the mean time that this judgemnt doesn't really come as a surprise.
 
you remember it all very differently from me. i recall walking thru the back streets of oxford street shouting "who's streets, our fucking streets", i remember people being too dimwitted to keep mobile and alert and alive, i can't forget being chased for miles by tsg goons, batons drawed cos we'd made our way out of the clamp-down. i don't think there was a conspiracy, more a massive error in strategy and planning.
 
Hi-ho, hi-ho, it's off to Strasbourg she goes :D





Skimming the judgement looking at the precedents cited, I'm thinking their Lordships may be trying to anticipate arguments there at the European Court of Human Rights.

I wouldn't be surprised if this pissed off the ECHR judges.
 
Oh well if first you can't the ruling you want then find another judge. Its' the way the game is played innit. Of course there is an element here than don't believe in the law which is quite ironic when you then start seeking rulings from courts. Then of course when it doesn't go your way ..

Anyway. The score is 40/0 to us. :D Deal with it.
 
Oh well if first you can't the ruling you want then find another judge. Its' the way the game is played innit. Of course there is an element here than don't believe in the law which is quite ironic when you then start seeking rulings from courts. Then of course when it doesn't go your way ..

Anyway. The score is 40/0 to us. :D Deal with it.

40/0? Depends on the period measured doesn't it?

Poll tax demo= 9/0 to us
June 18th 1999= 8/0 to us
Brixton riots 1985= 7/0 to us

I could go on.
 
Don't know if you would class Brixton as a demo more of a race riot.

I'll give you the Poll Tax Demo if you admit Mayday was a load of wank.
 
Don't know if you would class Brixton as a demo more of a race riot.

I'll give you the Poll Tax Demo if you admit Mayday was a load of wank.

Race riot? a) it wasn't and b) the racial elements were directed against who? Can you guess? It ws your comrade in arms for their shocking racism wasn't it?
 
40/0? Depends on the period measured doesn't it?

Poll tax demo= 9/0 to us
June 18th 1999= 8/0 to us
Brixton riots 1985= 7/0 to us

I could go on.

Does the Broadwater Farm riot count, or am I getting ahead of myself?
 
Don't know if you would class Brixton as a demo more of a race riot.

I'll give you the Poll Tax Demo if you admit Mayday was a load of wank.

Of the 2000 people nicked in Brixton 85, the majority were white so race riot??

Mayday with the gardening thingy was a load of wank yes.
 
Of the 2000 people nicked in Brixton 85, the majority were white so race riot??

Mayday with the gardening thingy was a load of wank yes.

Really didn't know but maybe its' because us coppers are afraid to nick black people or is that white people can't run fast when loaded down with cameras ?

On a serious note I was always led to believe that Brixton was a classic race riot ( I know the term is now considered old ) . Brixton was born out of the unrest by the black community against oppressive police tactics on sus called OP Swamp. Therefore race was surely an issue.

I am not sure Broadwater Farm was the same .
 
These lyrics from the Tottenham AK47's classic song entitled "Tottenham 3" (also covered by AOS3) provides some context I feel:

Tottenham three, set them free
Set them free, cos they're not guilty

Tottenham, October, 1985
Spirit of resistance, very much alive
When those racist cops tooled up, attack
Tottenham youth were ready to fight back
Against years and years of being pushed, downtrodden
Routinely harassed, its gone on too long
Cos the cops took a beating when they choose to attack
Tottenham youth were ready, Fight Back!

Those cops were reeling

Hundred were arrested in the months that followed
Doors smashed down in the middle of the night
Three men framed who are now in prison
State clampdown on those who fight
Against years and years of being pushed, downtrodden
Routinely harassed, its gone on too long
Cos the cops took a beating when they choose to attack
Tottenham youth were ready, Fight Back!

Tottenham three, set them free
Set them free, cos they're not guilty


...and they weren't either......
 
Don't know if you would class Brixton as a demo more of a race riot.

I'll give you the Poll Tax Demo if you admit Mayday was a load of wank.

It was great, first protest I ever went on. Got beaten up a bit, but I was so full of adrenaline I didn't even care. In the end everyone got too tired for it and went home, you can only spend so long running around.
 
These lyrics from the Tottenham AK47's classic song entitled "Tottenham 3" (also covered by AOS3) provides some context I feel:

Tottenham three, set them free
Set them free, cos they're not guilty

Tottenham, October, 1985
Spirit of resistance, very much alive
When those racist cops tooled up, attack
Tottenham youth were ready to fight back
Against years and years of being pushed, downtrodden
Routinely harassed, its gone on too long
Cos the cops took a beating when they choose to attack
Tottenham youth were ready, Fight Back!

Those cops were reeling

Hundred were arrested in the months that followed
Doors smashed down in the middle of the night
Three men framed who are now in prison
State clampdown on those who fight
Against years and years of being pushed, downtrodden
Routinely harassed, its gone on too long
Cos the cops took a beating when they choose to attack
Tottenham youth were ready, Fight Back!

Tottenham three, set them free
Set them free, cos they're not guilty


...and they weren't either......

Heh, I used to have that album.
 
Was it a female copper in charge? She was trying out her new crowd control containment theory? And now the Lords have backed her up.
I remember seeing it but sussed what they were up to and made sure I wasnt enclosed.

Think it is very dangerous having coppers containing people........especially after Hillsborough where all the coppers got off despite being guilty. What was the ratio of space allowed per person? Were the coppers watching overhead making sure no one got crushed or suffered injuries?
 
Back
Top Bottom