Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Mark Duggan shooting inquest in London finally starts...

The officer who shot Duggan twice, known as V53, testified he had seen a gun in Duggan's right hand, and believed the suspect was preparing to use it. V53 said he had acted in self-defence, fearing that his own life or the lives of his colleagues were in danger from Duggan.
A gun was found six metres away wrapped in a sock, so regardless of the jury's finding (and they did find that there was no gun in his hand), V53 was lying. Yet they continued to accept that he thought Duggan had a gun and was about to shoot. A very bizarre decision.
 
A gun was found six metres away wrapped in a sock, so regardless of the jury's finding, V53 was lying. Yet they continued to accept that he thought Duggan had a gun and was about to shoot. A very bizarre decision.
No, this is key. He thought that he saw a gun. You cannot get around that.
 
I doesn't matter. He said he thought he saw a gun. That's it. Game over. Where is the lie that can be proven?
That sounds like a very liberal interpretation. I know people get shot carrying pool cues and table legs and so on, but there should be something a little more substantial than I thought that bunch of flowers was an Uzi.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CRI
it is a literal and factual interpretation
there is nothing more substantial, copper thought he saw it and this has been proved to be 'ok' by the verdict
 
That sounds like a very liberal interpretation. I know people get shot carrying pool cues and table legs and so on, but there should be something a little more substantial than I thought that bunch of flowers was an Uzi.

It's not as egregious as the Harry Stanley case.
 
butchersapron said:
I doesn't matter. He said he thought he saw a gun. That's it. Game over. Where is the lie that can be proven?

None. The verdict is that 'belief' is enough to enact extrajudicial executions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CRI
That sounds like a very liberal interpretation. I know people get shot carrying pool cues and table legs and so on, but there should be something a little more substantial than I thought that bunch of flowers was an Uzi.
A gun was found six metres away wrapped in a sock, so regardless of the jury's finding, V53 was lying. Yet they continued to accept that he thought Duggan had a gun and was about to shoot. A very bizarre decision.

How is this proof that V53 was lying?
 
That sounds like a very liberal interpretation. I know people get shot carrying pool cues and table legs and so on, but there should be something a little more substantial than I thought that bunch of flowers was an Uzi.
Ceci n'est pas un bouquet de fleurs

bouquet-flowers-0808-lg.jpg
 
My youngest son came home today
His friends marched with him all the way
The pipe and drum beat out the time
While in his box of polished pine
Like dead meat on a butcher's tray
My youngest son came home today
And this time he's here to stay
 
What I'm getting at is that some people may want to think the absolute worst of plod to make a point, that it may well not be the case. It could, for example, have been cock-up followed by cover up.
Until they stop with the omerta then people are well entitled in thinking the worst IMO - given how often it later turns out to be correct.
 
Krishnan Murty just got proper shook (whilst interviewing Ken Hinds and that stupid ex-copper I mentioned earlier) when a few people started milling around them. Think he thought they were gonna kick off.
 
My youngest son came home today
His friends marched with him all the way
The pipe and drum beat out the time
While in his box of polished pine
Like dead meat on a butcher's tray
My youngest son came home today
And this time he's here to stay

Billy Bragg!
 
Krishnan Murty just got proper shook (whilst interviewing Ken Hinds and that stupid ex-copper I mentioned earlier) when a few people started milling around them. Think he thought they were gonna kick off.
To be fair he probably had people panicking in his ear 'Oh fuck, real life people! Ask them to talk - NO DON'T they're going to swear, back to studio, BACK TO STUDIO'
 
To be fair he probably had people panicking in his ear 'Oh fuck, real life people! Ask them to talk - NO DON'T they're going to swear, back to studio, BACK TO STUDIO'
The point surely is the gap between people like him and the people they talk about. So saying he's panicking is sort of the point.
 
Back
Top Bottom