ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
But the basic principle of judging every child protection decision is the same. I've only limited experience of these decisions and in very different circumstances, working with women with very chaotic and severe psychotic illnesses. It was vital that each pregnancy and child is separately assessed. You have to take a critical stance which nonetheless allows the possibility of change, however remote.
That said, I suspect in these cases, it's unlikely. And my personal opinion that's a just lifelong punishment. But that's also why I don't envy those who have to assess and make these decisions.
There was a very interesting case a few years ago where a woman had seven children in a row, each case assessed as it occurred, and each child was removed because of "incontrovertable" evidence of abuse. Turned out that the woman had a bone disease (osteogenesis imperfecta) that meant that their bones were extremely brittle. The woman herself had been in pain all her life (as had her father), but thought that it was "normal" for people to be in constant internal pain.