butchersapron
Bring back hanging
Very young, so yes. I really don't know on the second part.They're quite young too, aren't they? So they could potentially have more children (though surely they'd be removed at birth)
Very young, so yes. I really don't know on the second part.They're quite young too, aren't they? So they could potentially have more children (though surely they'd be removed at birth)
Just read them. Jesus Christ
I don't think they can stop them having children - keeping them is a different matter.They will never be allowed to have children though, which is some (small) comfort
Yeah. I couldn't go on after a few pages and skipped to the actual sentencing.Started reading. Stopped pretty soon after. Not sure what purpose it would serve to carry on reading.
They can appeal about being on the register 15 years after being released from prison. So most likely beyond the time they will be able to conceive. I can't imagine they'd be taken off it eitherVery young, so yes. I really don't know on the second part.
Sorry, that's what I meantI don't think they can stop them having children - keeping them is a different matter.
Started reading. Stopped pretty soon after. Not sure what purpose it would serve to carry on reading.
They're quite young too, aren't they? So they could potentially have more children (though surely they'd be removed at birth)
They will never be allowed to have children though, which is some (small) comfort
Not even going to try reading the sentencing. What I know already is grim enough.
Not even going to try reading the sentencing. What I know already is grim enough.
music stuff. raw multi track recordings and the like, i guess.The police took away 27 terabytes worth of memory (that's not all child/animal porn obv) but that's a lot of memory. What requires such memory?
no. its good to be able to see the facts.Shall i take down that sentencing remarks link? I tried to warn people as best but still feel it shouldn't be here.
In that case, chop him up and throw away the key.music stuff. raw multi track recordings and the like, i guess.
no. its good to be able to see the facts.
Started reading. Stopped pretty soon after. Not sure what purpose it would serve to carry on reading.
The police took away 27 terabytes worth of memory (that's not all child/animal porn obv) but that's a lot of memory. What requires such memory?
That surprises me... She did something unspeakable because a famous guy she fancied told her to- what happens when she meets some other famous bloke? I guess Social Services have to judge each case, I'm not saying there should be a blanket law, but surely (that word again!) these women won't be allowed access to children?There's no "surely" about it. AFAICR there's no legislation compelling removal. Each case has to be judged on an individual basis, so a post-prison child, while it would be highly likely to be monitored, wouldn't necessarily be removed without cause (and having been imprisoned for an offence in the past isn't necessarily cause, especially as for one of the women, the psych report assessed her as having a low likelihood of re-offending.
Fair enough. I'm a pretty hardcore hogger. Not got anywhere near that.HD films and TV's tha'ts what fills my PC with more than that 27TB, can pop stars be pirates also?
music stuff. raw multi track recordings and the like, i guess.
That surprises me... She did something unspeakable because a famous guy she fancied told her to- what happens when she meets some other famous bloke? I guess Social Services have to judge each case, I'm not saying there should be a blanket law, but surely (that word again!) these women won't be allowed access to children?
Fair enough. I'm a pretty hardcore hogger. Not got anywhere near that.
That sounds most likely - but at home it would be one track alone wouldn't it?Don't forget each track (and there can be tens of them to each song) are recorded in wav too, not mp3. It soon eats up hd real estate.
That sounds most likely - but at home it would be one track alone wouldn't it?