I agree. Not sure about the women though. I suspect that was all about wanting to please him. I suspect he played them off against one another - X is allowing me to do Y; I think she's the woman for me, etc. They are both quite young. I am wondering if they had babies to order for him to defilethe drugs were probably a factor but i don't think drugs can make a person into a paedophile if they're not already. It's more lilely that he had noncey urges to begin with and the drugs helped him be less inhibited about it.
I agree. Not sure about the women though. I suspect that was all about wanting to please him. I suspect he played them off against one another - X is allowing me to do Y; I think she's the woman for me, etc. They are both quite young. I am wondering if they had babies to order for him to defile
No, of course it isn't. But it tips the balance of power that little bit further when the bloke is not far off your dad's agebeing young isn't an excuse.
IThey are both quite young. I am wondering if they had babies to order for him to defile
No, of course it isn't. But it tips the balance of power that little bit further when the bloke is not far off your dad's age
The problem is that this has only been the case in the last decade, and even then is predicated on a fairly generic form of therapy that may only skim the surface of the offender's psychopathology. There's an unfortunate effect in such programmes, as in inmate programmes, where offenders deduce what the therapist wants to hear, and then present the therapist with a version of that. Without programmes that lean heavily toward one-on-one therapy, I'm not convinced that such solutions do much more than teach offenders to hide better.
if he was like that in 2004-5 then it probably wasn't drugs.
Well no, of course not! I'm not saying that all younger people are sheep at all. But I can't imagine you would have become obsessed with a pop star either. When my sister was in the throes of her anorexia, she was convinced that she had a spiritual connection with a particular singer and that he was giving her messages through his songs. She'd never met him and (as far as I know) he isn't an evil person. But if she had met him and he had been a truly evil man, I don't know what she would have done to 'prove' her love. I'm 99% sure she wouldn't have done anything like this but there's immense power in that relationshipto rape a baby tho? really?
im not saying you're wrong, but i know that i would have run a mile if anyone suggested anything close to that and i was talking to people much older than me on urban75 for ages
Jesus H Christ on a bike.
I don't fancy their chances in a women's prison, either.
to rape a baby tho? really?
im not saying you're wrong, but i know that i would have run a mile if anyone suggested anything close to that and i was talking to people much older than me on urban75 for ages
I can't either. I think I'm trying to find a way to make it understandable. It does my head in tbh - I can't think about these babies or Peter Connelly or Aftab Khan or Khyra Ishaq without feeling so sick I can't sleep. It's incomprehensiblefair enough and yeah i did some stupid fucking things when i was young. i just cant imagine how depraved you must be to do this. i cant imagine what goes through someones head to think that is all right. i mean wtf.
I can't either. I think I'm trying to find a way to make it understandable. It does my head in tbh - I can't think about these babies or Peter Connelly or Aftab Khan or Khyra Ishaq without feeling so sick I can't sleep. It's incomprehensible
As regards the mothers, I think it was in the Vanessa George case where it was presented as a bloke who'd manipulated the two women but one of them at least was found to be actively interested in sex with children.
I hear that completely. I'm not completely familiar with the contents but having done some DV perp groupwork I can imagine there are types of offenders who the programmes works for and others who it doesn't.
A kid I work with was assessed for the Northumbria program and they rejected him for the reason that he would probably learn more from the course and other offenders rather than address his own offending. As he still has to complete a court directed program he has to do individual work. The option remains open to return to court if he doesn't engage properly.
I work with younger offenders generally and seem to see more sex offenders than I realised exisited in our cohort. A lot of lads who've come from homes where domestic violence, parental drug abuse and open access to porn seem to be major contributing factors.
to rape a baby tho? really?
im not saying you're wrong, but i know that i would have run a mile if anyone suggested anything close to that and i was talking to people much older than me on urban75 for ages
No, of course it isn't. But it tips the balance of power that little bit further when the bloke is not far off your dad's age
Thing is, you were mostly talking with people who saw you and treated you as an equal, whereas Watkins sought out people where the balance of power in any relationship would lie with him - where he could mould those people to his will. BVasically he groomed those mothers for abuse, and then used every trick in the book to make sure of their complicity in his crimes.
ViolentPanda I have always known the gist of what you expalin in 353, but it was when I first read about the Bulger murder in real details, a few years ago, that it was really brought home to me. Venables and Thompson's wickedness can't be fully justified by the environment they grew up in (other kids in similar circumstances don't turn out to be killers), but after reading what their lives were like, it wasn't that much of a surprise that they turned out to be so twisted.
but even if you are, how do you get it to come up in a conversation?
if you told the majority of people you were a paedophile 99% of them would be disgusted. and you might even be lucky to be alive. He must have been able to tell they would be responsive or interested in paedophilia before he said it, or that they were weak and impressionable enough to go along with it.