Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Looks like Genesis P-Orridge has died

I'm quite fond of (definitely not right-wing) David Shariatmadari's phrase, that is a smug phrase from those 'with a false sense of power or superiority' Tho, yeah, I grant you, it can be/usually is used by the right.
It doesnt matter where its from. It's a far right attack line now, so you shouldn't use it.
 
aah, so you're a virtue signalling hypocrite. Good lad

This is utterly ridiculous. Quite apart from me not knowing that Gill designed fonts never mind knowing which are his, using a font is not the same as explicitly celebrating someone's creativity. Nice try, though.
 
This is utterly ridiculous. Quite apart from me not knowing that Gill designed fonts never mind knowing which are his, using a font is not the same as explicitly celebrating someone's creativity. Nice try, though.
funny how you 'argument' keeps subtly shifting, isn't it? And peculiar that you can't recognise how some can live a contradictory life, all of which should be recognised at their death. Which is what most people are doing here.
 
funny how you 'argument' keeps subtly shifting, isn't it? And peculiar that you can't recognise how some can live a contradictory life, all of which should be recognised at their death. Which is what most people are doing here.

My argument's not shifting at all. And, fundamentally I agree with you that the totality - good and bad - should be recognised at death (and before). My point was that the mealy-mouthed caveats didn't strike that balance. It seemed like the abuse was being glossed over, which, sadly (as others have pointed out) isn't an uncommon thing - certain artists seem to get more of a pass than others.
 
This Athos fellow - I seem to remember him expressing doubt about whether i was a woman or not a while back because I'm a trans ally. He seems to want to misgender P-Orridge too. Whatever he thinks of P-Orridge as an abuser I think misgendering is low just because you disapprove of a human being's choices in life. Gender identity isn't a privilege to be withdrawn at the whim of any old random person who is offended. It's a fact and denial of that fact is a lie and an untruth as well as being a warning to anyone who aligns themselves to trans people and their rights, not just trans people apparently, but cis allies too.

(Athos be warned I will not be responding to you so please don't waste your breath)
 
This Athos fellow - I seem to remember him expressing doubt about whether i was a woman or not a while back because I'm a trans ally. He seems to want to misgender P-Orridge too. Whatever he thinks of P-Orridge as an abuser I think misgendering is low just because you disapprove of a human being's choices in life. Gender identity isn't a privilege to be withdrawn at the whim of any old random person who is offended. It's a fact and denial of that fact is a lie and an untruth as well as being a warning to anyone who aligns themselves to trans people and their rights, not just trans people apparently, but cis allies too.

(Athos be warned I will not be responding to you so please don't waste your breath)

I've said many times, going back years, that I consider you a woman (as I do all trans women), so don't start that shit.

If I misgendered them (which I seem to have done in just one of my posts, as have others, by the way), then it was by accident. I've never deliberately misgendendered anyone, and never would. In this instance, not so much for their sake (I don't care about hurting the feelings of people who abuse women), but because of the wider issue.
 
In all fairnes, Genesis P-Orridge didn’t identify as traditionally transgender but as "pandrogenic" a term which so far applies to only two people/one person and was an attempt to merge with her/his partner to become one identity. Then you have to look up that the preferred pronoun isn’t "they", "she" or "he" but "s/he" or "her/his". During the most high profile part of P-Orridge‘s career s/he was a he.

I don't always agree with Athos, but in this case it’s a bit of unfair to call him out for purposely misgendering P-Orridge. Slip-ups happen and all you can do is to learn and try to remember. Accusing others of purposely misgendering an individual when it likely was a honest mistake isn’t helpful.


edit: corrected because I made a mistake too, these things are tricky to navigate in terms of language
 
Last edited:
I tried to like Throbbing Gristle, but I mostly failed, and the art mostly left me cold as well. p-o always struck me as self-absorbed, self-centred and selfish. Now artists are self-absorbed, generally - they're looking inward primarily, after all. But the art that then resonates is that which discovers truths that are shared with others. Struck me that p-o was after something rather opposed to that - discovering what it was that wasn't shared, that made p-o special, that which could not resonate. The pandrogenic project appears as the ultimate end of all that. Far less interesting than the pair of them thought it was, imho.
 
In all fairnes, Genesis P-Orridge didn’t identify as traditionally transgender but as "pandrogenic" a term which so far applies to only two people/one person and was an attempt to merge with her/his partner to become one identity. Then you have to look up that the preferred pronoun isn’t "they", "she" or "he" but "s/he" or "her/his". During the most high profile part of P-Orridge‘s career s/he was a he.

I don't always agree with Athos, but in this case it’s a bit of unfair to call him out for purposely misgendering P-Orridge. Slip-ups happen and all you can do is to learn and try to remember. Accusing others of purposely misgendering an individual when it likely was a honest mistake isn’t helpful.


edit: corrected because I made a mistake too, these things are tricky to navigate in terms of language
That in itself raises tricky questions. To what extend should the rest of us feel obliged to use the pronouns they chose for themselves? Do we get to dictate these things in that way? What are the limits to that, if any? If anything about the artistic project is of interest, it is the way it poses these questions.
 
I've never really dug into Psychic TV's massive back catalogue, but love this tribute to Ian Curtis (and the album it's from):

 
That might not be the most representative example of TG's sound, but it's a stone cold classic, my favourite of theirs.
That's lush, most of the T G stuff I've listened to has been, shall we say challenging, which I suppose is the point but yeah, this is great 😊👍@X
 
I've noticed this far right attack line slipping into more common usage recently, and would prefer it if it didn't.

i see that, yet i found myself using it (here on these boards) to describe a certain rightwing behavior. it's useful and accurate, when it's correct (as it was when i used it :D)
 
Back
Top Bottom