Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Local Elections May 5th 2022



Overall majority in the new unitary authority (formerly three districts) and not a single fucking one of them elected in my district! Told yers, they're gonna build Farron a fucking pyramid up here.


I've become increasingly angry by this over the course of the evening. We've gone from a labour-dominated borough council with some tories to a libdem unitary authority despite not a single one of the fuckers being elected here :mad:
 
Update again -

England -341 (2 councils still to declare)
Wales -75 (2 councils still to declare)
Scotland -62 (all declared)
TOTAL -478

Even Adam Boulton on TalkTV's 'The News Desk' is saying this is so much worst for the Tories than was thought from the overnight results. :D

That iditol Isabel Oakeshott disagrees with Boulton, and thinks Johnson will be more than happy with the results. :facepalm:

This morning, lost Tory seats -

England -341 (2 councils still to declare)
Wales -86 (all declared)
Scotland -62 (all declared)
TOTAL -489

Fuck knows why 2 councils in England still haven't declared their full results.

What needs remembering is Labour went into these elections defending a lot more seats (2879) than the Tories who were defending just 1856 seats, it means they lost over a quarter of their seats so far.

These are the figures from the BBC - explained here:

How is seat change calculated?​

The change in the number of councillors for each party is calculated by comparing this election result with the result the last time these seats were contested.

For some councils not all their seats will be contested at this election, as some authorities only have elections for half or a third of seats at any given time.
In Scotland and Wales the seats were last up in 2017, while in London the last elections were in 2018.

In other parts of England these dates differ. For most councils the seats were last contested in 2018 but in some areas it was 2019 and others 2021.

There are some areas where change is more difficult to calculate because there have been boundary changes or the number of councillors representing each ward has changed. In four areas there are brand new councils.

In cases like this, the BBC uses "notional results" to project what the previous result would have been if the new boundaries had been in place at the last election.

 
Only if you think a government that essentially agrees with the Tories on almost every issue is worth the effort.
I am not making a value judgement and also Libdems being in a position to cost the Tories seats can benefit a Labour majority it doesn't mean they have to be in government.
 
So, the BBC has the Tories on -489, Sky has them on -481, and the Guardian has them on -398, they haven't updated their page since 7.45pm yesterday, but that was still a lot lower than others at the time, and there's no explanation as to how they've calculated it. 🤷‍♂️
 
This is a LD councillor, but bear with it as it enumerates some underhand Tory tactics, some of which will be familiar to everyone but some new to me. The Tory lost, btw.
 
So, the BBC has the Tories on -489, Sky has them on -481, and the Guardian has them on -398, they haven't updated their page since 7.45pm yesterday, but that was still a lot lower than others at the time, and there's no explanation as to how they've calculated it. 🤷‍♂️
Part way down the page

Why do the seat tallies differ between outlets?​

 
Look how close, glad I went !View attachment 321551
In the one County that the Tory bastards held in Wales they lost control but without any party getting a majority, Labour could have taken it, but one ward actually had a dead tie on votes between Labour and the bastards, they resolved this by tossing a coin..the bastards won the toss (somebody remind me this is the 21st century?)
 
Part way down the page

Why do the seat tallies differ between outlets?​


Cheers, I hadn't seen that page.

Direct link.

Why do the seat tallies differ between outlets?​

A quick note to explain the data we’re publishing. You might have noticed that the tallies of the number of seats gained and lost so far by each party differs between outlets. This is for a number of reasons.

Our data on councillor numbers comes from the PA Media news agency, which only reports on complete councils, while some sources report each council seat as it comes in.

There are also differences in the point of comparison: PA calculates change based on the status of each seat just before the election, not on its status after the preceding election.

Lastly, there are frequent changes in ward boundaries and the number of councillors per ward, to maintain equality of representation. This may mean that parties’ net seat changes in one particular council may not balance each other out.
 
Queues at my polling station.:eek:

I'm predicting a triple Green landslide in my ward based on that.
Was right for once.

A 5-800 vote gap between the Green candidates and the Labour ones.

Haven't managed to find % or turnout yet though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sue
In the one County that the Tory bastards held in Wales they lost control but without any party getting a majority, Labour could have taken it, but one ward actually had a dead tie on votes between Labour and the bastards, they resolved this by tossing a coin..the bastards won the toss (somebody remind me this is the 21st century?)
how else should a tie be decided?
 
In minor party news...

Unlike Alba, Wales' ego-driven Nationalist splinters Propel and Gwlad both won a seat each.
 
how else should a tie be decided?
rIITFNP.png

XKfb4jR.png
 
Could you imagine Johnson and Starmer duelling?

Johnson would hide in a fridge and send Fabricant out as his second hoping nobody would notice.

Starmer would forensically examine the duelling rule book to find a way of avoiding taking part, meanwhile Wes Streating would push a passing Jeremy Corbyn into the line of fire.
 
Back
Top Bottom