yes, but then so did I and many others who've spent the last 6 months pointing out the differences between the 2 situations to you.
There are no foreign invaders on the ground here for people to fight against for a start.
Twitter reckons that Gaddafi was just speaking on the phone to AlJazeera Arabic, he said his house was surrounded by rebels but they told him he would be ok if he stayed put. Then he said a prayer and the sound of gunshots could be heard in the background.
dumb fuckers. Could have got out alive, will now probably not see dawn.Guards shot some people outside. Mohammad is inside, but he'd better surrender himself. It could be trapped or all that stuff he said is a lie.
http://www.focus-fen.net/index.php?id=n257239Caracas. Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez and his Iranian counterpart Mahmoud Ahmadinejad have denounced the West's "imperialist aggression" in Libya and Syria, the foreign ministry in Caracas said Tuesday, AFP reported.
The statement by the two arch US foes comes amid a NATO air bombing campaign in Libya where rebels are seeking to oust strongman Moamer Kadhafi, and growing pressure from the West for Syrian President Bashar al-Assad to step aside.
I don't think he expects to do a shah of Iran type comeback. But I suppose he has fantasies. I really don't know how active he was in getting the uprising going but it seemed it had little to do with an old royal family. They are just getting rid of a more recent one.Oooh look, here's the Crown Prince of Libya meeting with western powers. Talking about who's going to run the place, maybe?
http://www.arabianbusiness.com/exiled-libyan-crown-prince-sees-gaddafi-toppled-soon-415894.html
Its all looking quite royalist now isnt it? Popular revolution my arse!
Interesting alliance you've formed there.Hugo & Mahmoud must be unhappy today.
They formed it. This was an announcement by the Chavez gov about a phone call between Chavez & Achman.Interesting alliance you've formed there.
The West has just engineered regime change in order to install its own puppet government. Of course its the same. I'm just waiting for Cameron to announce "mission accomplished" .yes, but then so did I and many others who've spent the last 6 months pointing out the differences between the 2 situations to you.
There are no foreign invaders on the ground here for people to fight against for a start.
ps oil has just gone down in price. Is that because the west is going to get some from Libya cheaper than before?
Wrong. Throwing their weight behind Gadaffi would have given a much quicker outcome and then the oil companies would only have had to deal with his family, not a populist government which may have all kinds of ideas about the oil resource. Gadaffi was a reliable partner for western oil.lol, thats not how it works.
The oil price does not reflect how cheaply we will get Libya's oil in future. It reflects the hope that the conflict is near an end, and that 1.6 million barrels per day of oil may soon again be available from Libya.
Maintaining secure supply of precious oil at a time where there is not a very comfortable gap between supply and demand is certainly one big reason why intervention in Libya was taken. And companies involved will certainly be looking for a great deal now, one which will likely cause the people of Libya to lose out. But todays oil price is about availability of oil, not what price it will be available for.
The TNC is not a populist government. It represents Benghazi and the opposition is riven by divisions and factionalism. There are already indications of distrust between Misrata and the TNC and we know there are strong Islamist factions within it. Anyone who thinks this is going to result in anything but factional disintegration and civil war is deluding themselvesWrong. Throwing their weight behind Gadaffi would have given a much quicker outcome and then the oil companies would only have had to deal with his family, not a populist government which may have all kinds of ideas about the oil resource. Gadaffi was a reliable partner for western oil.
The rebel group is not a cohesive assemblage, but made of disparate factions. The main rebel group, based in Benghazi in the country’s east, consists of former government ministers who have defected, and longstanding opposition figures, representing a range of political views including Arab nationalists, Islamists, secularists, socialists and businessmen. Their military forces are a hodge-podge of armed groups, former soldiers and freelance militias, including amateur neighborhood gangs and former members of an Islamist guerrilla group crushed by Gaddafi in the 1990s.
For if Gaddafi proved too weak to stay in power, this does not mean that the rebels have overwhelming strength. They were saved from defeat last March by Nato aircraft striking at Gaddafi's armour as it advanced on Benghazi. They are entering Tripoli now only because they have received tactical air support from Nato.
It is an extraordinary situation. The Transitional National Council (TNC) in Benghazi is now recognised by more than 30 foreign governments, including the US and Britain, as the government of Libya. But it is by no means clear that it is recognised as such by the rebel militiamen who are in the process of seizing the capital. The rebel fighters in Misrata, who fought so long to defend their city, say privately that they have no intention of obeying orders from the TNC. Their intransigence may not last but it is one sign that the insurgents are deeply divided
The West has just engineered regime change in order to install its own puppet government. Of course its the same. I'm just waiting for Cameron to announce "mission accomplished" .
And in 6 months time (if that) when a weak, divided and fractured puppet government is battling an Islamist insurgency and has abandoned all pretence at democracy we will see what western enforced ""democracy" looks like.