Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Libcom April fools?

jimmer said:
:D

Are you serious?!

tinfoil-hat.jpg

You might remember that at one time a far left group was in deep correspondence with a new Ukrainian group only to find out some time later after committing resources, flights and personnel that its new international group never in fact existed.
 
the button said:
So you didn't re-register on libcom, pretending to be Dave D, a working class militant more respected than you could ever hope to be? Interesting.

Dave D is Dave D - Dave D is nobody. You are wankers for believing it could be anything else... You cannot blame somebody for the IMAGINARY CONCLUSIONS others have drawn, that is entirely their own doing.

AND why is abuse (prejeudice) aimed at those with mental health issues tolerated on progressive websites? Prejeudice and abuse isn't allowed or tolerated on racial grounds...


Edit to add: When I said Dave D is nobody, I was not meaning the Dave you lot are referring to. I mean just that there is nobody called Dave D. as far as I know - therefore Dave D is nobody...
 
walter skinner said:
Is it ethical to play tricks like this on the left or are those who do wittingly or unwittingly being engaged in the sabotage and undermining of those who are against the state. Is there a wider agenda or an unseen hand at play?

If this is a reference to Limpcock - they are nothing, there's nothing to undermine....
 
Attica said:
If this is a reference to Limpcock - they are nothing, there's nothing to undermine....

if there is nothing to undermine, then why are you littering urban75 with insults in their general direction?

whether you care or couldn't care less, concealed within every limp cock is the potentiality for expansive pleasure, self-pleasure, pleasure of another, pleasure of many others. perhaps you mistake impotent for i'm potent (come and have a go if you think you're hard enough)
 
Luther Blissett said:
if there is nothing to undermine, then why are you littering urban75 with insults in their general direction?

whether you care or couldn't care less, concealed within every limp cock is the potentiality for expansive pleasure, self-pleasure, pleasure of another, pleasure of many others. perhaps you mistake impotent for i'm potent (come and have a go if you think you're hard enough)

For general entertainment purposes:D

Action reaction action reaction... its just basic politics:)
 
Luther Blissett said:
concealed within every limp cock is the potentiality for expansive pleasure, self-pleasure, pleasure of another, pleasure of many others. perhaps you mistake impotent for i'm potent (come and have a go if you think you're hard enough)
I love this quote so much, I'm going to marry it and have tiny little interweb babies with it :D
 
have to agree with that, the liberal splattering of the term 'nutter' is unpleasant and wrong...

AND why is abuse (prejeudice) aimed at those with mental health issues tolerated on progressive websites? Prejeudice and abuse isn't allowed or tolerated on racial grounds...
 
walter skinner said:
Is it ethical to play tricks like this on the left or are those who do wittingly or unwittingly being engaged in the sabotage and undermining of those who are against the state. Is there a wider agenda or an unseen hand at play?

Or..maybe that's what they want you to think. At Amazon.
 
walter skinner said:
Is there a wider agenda or an unseen hand at play?
My unseen hand is always at play.

The cheeky scamp.


(*edit to add: that's a mighty familiar IP address you've got there 'walter'!)
 
treelover said:
have to agree with that, the liberal splattering of the term 'nutter' is unpleasant and wrong...

Indeed, it is not anarchists or socialists who do that - it is a wierd sort of authoritarianism and its mouth pieces. Anarchism in particular has never tolerated prejeudice of any sort.:D
 
Indeed, it is not anarchists or socialists who do that - it is a wierd sort of authoritarianism and its mouth pieces. Anarchism in particular has never tolerated prejeudice of any sort.


Ps- moderators - are you really going to tolerate prejeudicial abuse on this website? What does this say about you?

PPS - Paul that is a website I thought about doing, but lost interest in doing, I may come back to it but for now i am busy with other things.
 
Attica said:
Ps- moderators - are you really going to tolerate prejeudicial abuse on this website? What does this say about you?
Seeing as you haven't troubled yourself to actually report any posts from this thread, I'd be fascinated if you tell us mods what our failure to react to a non existant complaint supposedly says about us.
 
Attica said:
Indeed, it is not anarchists or socialists who do that - it is a wierd sort of authoritarianism and its mouth pieces. Anarchism in particular has never tolerated prejeudice of any sort.:D

It's had to put up with your drivellings though for years....:rolleyes:

As someone who suffers from mental health problems, fuck off with your sanctimonious tosh about what language can and can't be used.

You don't speak for me....nutter!
 
*Oh, and if any of the Libcom mods are unhappy with this thread, I'd be happy to close it, if that's what you want (although you guys are currently linking to it from your own site).
 
I don't understand this thread. Seems to be some other argument that's spilled over. Meh.
 
editor said:
Seeing as you haven't troubled yourself to actually report any posts from this thread, I'd be fascinated if you tell us mods what our failure to react to a non existant complaint supposedly says about us.

Ok - take this as a complaint.
 
Zonk said:
It's had to put up with your drivellings though for years....:rolleyes:

As someone who suffers from mental health problems, fuck off with your sanctimonious tosh about what language can and can't be used.

You don't speak for me....nutter!

Reactionary language is reactioanry language - it doesn't get less reactionary the more you say it...
 
Back
Top Bottom