Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Laurence Fox. The twat.

Also retweeted this:

In shocking development Lawrence Fox retweets offensive cartoon
 
Hurray, I'm snitch of the day!

"An update on your report
Thanks again for letting us know. Our investigation found that this account violated the Twitter Rules:


The Reclaim Party
@thereclaimparty
We appreciate your help in improving everyone’s experience on Twitter. You can learn more about reporting abusive behaviour here."

I can't remember why I reported them but it would have been something heinious.
 
Last edited:
Hurray, I'm snitch of the day!

"An update on your report
Thanks again for letting us know. Our investigation found that this account violated the Twitter Rules:


The Reclaim Party
@thereclaimparty
We appreciate your help in improving everyone’s experience on Twitter. You can learn more about reporting abusive behaviour here."

I can't remember why I reported them but it would have been something heinious.
Was it a transphobic tweet?
 
He's back and as much of a twat as ever. He's being sued for libel and wants a jury trial. He probably wants a the jury primarily for his counterclaim. He called three people paedophiles and they called him a racist.

Fox is being sued by Simon Blake, former vice chair of LGBT charity Stonewall, RuPaul’s Drag Race star Crystal, whose real name is Colin Seymour, and Coronation Street actress Nicola Thorp – and is counterclaiming against the trio for alleging he is a ‘racist’ – over tweets sent in October 2020.

Libel trials always used to be in front of a jury but the Defamation Act 2013 changed that. The last one in front of a jury was Frankie Boyle's successful claim against the Mirror.

Fox wants a jury as the most recent judicial guidance in the Equal Treatment Bench Book states that racism is ‘a term defined more by effects/outcomes than by motives’ . On that basis he's stuffed, which is why he wants the jury to decide if he's racist. Unlike the US, we don't have jury challenges here, so it's a lottery as to the guardianista /gammon balance in the jury. I haven't seen his original tweets so don't know his chances in the claim against him. I'm guessing he's going on the old gay=paedo trope possibly with some pizzagate thrown in .

There's no right to a jury trial. A judge decides that a preliminary hearing.

His barrister Alexandra Marzec said a jury would be ‘a diverse group of people better able to reach a consensus on the meaning of the word racism, as to which there is currently a very wide gulf of understanding’.

She added in written submissions that the vindication Fox could obtain from a jury ‘will be worth all the more, not least for being incapable of being undermined on the lazy basis that a white judge sided with a white man who denied being racist’.
 
And his primary reason for the trial that's been put before the judge is that the same judge won't be capable of being impartial or fair.

I think I know what the judge's decision will be...

View attachment 320547

Mystic Bahnof is correct. The judge gave two fingers to twat boy

The Defendant has not satisfied me that a fair-minded and informed observer would conclude that there was a real possibility that a judge trying this case alone would suffer from "involuntary bias"

Undoubtedly Fox will claim that the British public support him and their voice is being silenced or some bollocks like that
 
I know most judges are still white (though it turns out that nearly one in ten are not white these days), but maybe it's best in a libel case regarding racism not to state as fact that the judge will be white?
 
Just Farage retweeting Laurence Fox sharing a fucking awful Ricky Gervais bit. Thank god these right thinking men are standing up for women’s rights 🙄

 
Now he's trying to incite far-Right knights to assassinate Justin Welby and the Archbishop of Yoirk

"Rid the ... Church of these turbulent priests".
 
Back
Top Bottom