Deja vu... Facebook is trashbat.co.ck all over again..
Details!?
It didn't seem likely this was going to end overly well.
This is complete bullshit, the exits were closed to prevent people joining the crowd, not to contain it, which would have been a physical impossibility given the tiny number of police present.Despite polite requests to disperse, the people refused to undertake a reasonable request by police officers, so most of the exits were locked to contain the crowd and disperse by forced means.
Which were also organised on Facebook, rather undermining your already flimsy argument.It seems that a number of other groups organised their own mini-parties at different places around the network, sensibly, and most of those went without trouble.
There were at least 30 events on Facebook, the 3 biggest of which had over 30,000 confirmed guests. Each.never said how many coppers it'd take to do it in half an hour... may have been looking at the wrong facebook page, the one i was looking at only had about a thousand confirmed guests on it.
Who needs Facebook when you've got people dumb enough to be photographed doing this:still I reckon the point stands - if it had kicked off the police would just have needed to spend a bit of time trawling through the invite list and photos from facebook to get most of them afterwards.
Facebook, LOL.
There were at least 30 events on Facebook, the 3 biggest of which had over 30,000 confirmed guests. Each.
Who needs Facebook when you've got people dumb enough to be photographed doing this:
i think it did minorly kick off you know kids....
a messy event all round.
What's ridiculous about it?
That's one of the only good things that's happened to public transport recently
Did you go Tax?
Looks like a good event to me. The people who think they are political are not organising political responses to oppression so why is it so strange that things like this happen?
It is amusing to me that so much scepticism can be aimed at popular protest.
it wasn't political.
it was an excuse for loads of media kids and students to get pissed on the circle line and have a laugh.
i've read quite a few comments stating it 'wasn't a protest'
it's not some radical movement opposing oppression, it's a load of nice kids getting pissed.
it's not some radical movement opposing oppression, it's a load of nice kids getting pissed.
That's my idea of hell.Reminds me of this 'flashmob' event I saw on facebook that is an ill-thought out idea on so many levels: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=9857059828
Looks like a good event to me.
Who are these 'media types' people keep going on about? Isn't this just lazy stereotyping? How can you tell from a photograph that people are medie type?
Large numbers of people gathering together in opposition to sthng? Certainly seems like a protest.It's not protest though really is it?
No-one's stopping you.Personally I'm pissed off at the ban, but there are more important things to protest about, like the price of tube fares for one thing, and the ridiculous oyster card system
Large numbers of people gathering together in opposition to sthng? Certainly seems like a protest.
They could do that anyway, so their choice to do it on 31st May was a political choice, perhaps not a well-thought out one, but nonetheless it was undoubtedly the largest instance of civil disobedience in the UK for some time.it wasn't political.
it was an excuse for loads of media kids and students to get pissed on the circle line and have a laugh.
They could do that anyway, so their choice to do it on 31st May was a political choice, perhaps not a well-thought out one, but nonetheless it was undoubtedly the largest instance of civil disobedience in the UK for some time.
It was a protest action, why would it need banners? Did you have trouble understanding why people had gathered?They weren't protesting though. Where were the banners or anything else protesting?
It was just a bunch of wankers jumping on a bandwagon for a cause that most of them didn't realise was allowed until they heard it was being banned.