purves grundy
ambient clown remix
Someone's just given me this book. I know it's (in)famous, I'm aware it's post-Marxist, but I'm sure it demands a working knowledge of Marxism to begin with which is beyond mine. Anybody read it?
It's a long time since I read it, but wasn't it trying to provide a theoretical justification for the 'rainbow politics' of a lot of the urban cosmopolitan left in Britain and the US in the 1980s?
Yep pretty much, radicalism as a long march of pushing boundaries further and further, a generalised resistance of all the marginalised broadening out 'democracy', with no central contradiction with the potential to blow the foundations sky high.
The whole motion of class being just another form of oppression like sexism, racism, homophobia etc rather than the fundamental organising principle through which all those other oppressions are mediated and refracted. It takes class as just another identity politic.
Laclau and Mouffe were an item at the time, weren't they?
Laclau and Mouffe were an item at the time, weren't they?
Had a go but can't see what Mouffe's driving at.
They've been married for decades. She used to be one of his students.
Eh? It still happens. Who on earth wouldn't let two adults 'get away' with it?It was different in their generation, I suppose. You wouldn't get away with marrying a student today.
One area in which they could profitably have followed Althusser.
Given Laclau's influence on Podemos, Sanders and Corbynism isn't it a bit surprising that there hasn't been a resurgence of interest in his writing?
His work on populism does lay behind/strongly influences the strategies of a lot of latin american and southern european social movements - there has been a def upswing in interest since his death - after near 20 years of very little.Has Laclau really influenced anybody at all, other than a tiny gaggle of poststructualist professors?