Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Laclau and Mouffe's 'Hegemony and Socialist Strategy'

purves grundy

ambient clown remix
Someone's just given me this book. I know it's (in)famous, I'm aware it's post-Marxist, but I'm sure it demands a working knowledge of Marxism to begin with which is beyond mine. Anybody read it?
 
I've not read it but I had dinner with Ernesto Laclau a couple of weeks ago. He's a regular in a pub my best friend's girlfriend works in. Nice fella, appalling English considering he's lived here for over 30 years. Some great anecdotes about the Argentinian coups and Slavoj Zizek phoning him in the middle of the night to tell him dirty jokes.

Agonism within democracy. He's a reformist and a social democrat.
 
It's a long time since I read it, but wasn't it trying to provide a theoretical justification for the 'rainbow politics' of a lot of the urban cosmopolitan left in Britain and the US in the 1980s?
 
It's a long time since I read it, but wasn't it trying to provide a theoretical justification for the 'rainbow politics' of a lot of the urban cosmopolitan left in Britain and the US in the 1980s?

Yep pretty much, radicalism as a long march of pushing boundaries further and further, a generalised resistance of all the marginalised broadening out 'democracy', with no central contradiction with the potential to blow the foundations sky high.

The whole motion of class being just another form of oppression like sexism, racism, homophobia etc rather than the fundamental organising principle through which all those other oppressions are mediated and refracted. It takes class as just another identity politic.
 
Yep pretty much, radicalism as a long march of pushing boundaries further and further, a generalised resistance of all the marginalised broadening out 'democracy', with no central contradiction with the potential to blow the foundations sky high.

The whole motion of class being just another form of oppression like sexism, racism, homophobia etc rather than the fundamental organising principle through which all those other oppressions are mediated and refracted. It takes class as just another identity politic.

And that all worked out brilliantly in the end, didn't it?

tony_blair_1997.jpg
 
Given Laclau's influence on Podemos, Sanders and Corbynism isn't it a bit surprising that there hasn't been a resurgence of interest in his writing?
 
Given Laclau's influence on Podemos, Sanders and Corbynism isn't it a bit surprising that there hasn't been a resurgence of interest in his writing?

Has Laclau really influenced anybody at all, other than a tiny gaggle of poststructualist professors?
 
I completed an Urban Studies MSc last year and all the architects/planners/urban designer Bartlett types loved Laclau and to a greater extent Mouffe. Agonistic pluralism got much love.

Which is telling
 
Back
Top Bottom