Sasaferrato
Super Refuser!
Israel is a disgusting racist nation.
I see the usual suspects are back at the ' Jew baiting ' game.
Israel is a disgusting racist nation.
If the Turkish nation has any pride, dignity or balls it will hit back hard.
The Turkish Navy could shell Tel Aviv.
If the Turkish nation has any pride, dignity or balls it will hit back hard.
The Turkish Navy could shell Tel Aviv.
I am not saying that this action is right or acceptable, but that it could very easily have been avoided.
This post is contradicted by the news reports here on Portuguese TV, and by the interview with one of the so-called humanitarian activists from Turkey.
I see the usual suspects are back at the ' Jew baiting ' game.
Save your typing time, the anti-Semitic brigade will not listen. They are not interested in facts, only in having a pop at the Jews on every available occasion.
Save your typing time, the anti-Semitic brigade will not listen. They are not interested in facts, only in having a pop at the Jews on every available occasion.
That won't happen. But Turkey used to be Israel's only ally in the region. Not any more.If the Turkish nation has any pride, dignity or balls it will hit back hard.
The Turkish Navy could shell Tel Aviv.
Do the Turks have nuclear weapons?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/10195838.stm
However, on BBC Breakfast news at about 6.45am, a very bizarre report about events kept referring to Israeli forces "trying to control" the people they were beating and killing. It took me a while to understand the report. It was an outrageous and sickening example of bias.
I have complained. http://www.bbc.co.uk/complaints/homepage/ If you saw it, I urge you to complain also.
In what other circumstances would storming and aid ship and beating and killing those on board be called "trying to control" them?
An attack on a NATO member state is an attack on all NATO members.
Plus Iran can erase Israel.
Wow. You post that, yet have the gall to accuse the BBC of bias?
The boats were heading into the exclusion zone, Israel and Egypt both offered safe harbour, where the goods could be inspected and forwarded to Gaza. The convoy refused. The Israelis boarded the convoy, and were shot at during the process. Six Israeli soldiers were injured,one critically.
That is an accurate synopsis of the latest news report, which bears little resemblance to your post. Why is that?
Incidentally, the interview with the Israeli spokesman was done in a robust manner, there was no pro-Israeli bias whatsoever, in fact, if there was bias it was towards the convoy people.
And you, you racist hun bastard, with the blood of Irish children on your hands...
anti Arab racist cunt.
Hurriyet said:The Israeli navy attacked an aid flotilla carrying hundreds of activists including European members of Parliament early Monday morning, news agencies reported.
The Turkish Foreign Ministry has issued a formal protest over the raid on the aid flotilla, and Ankara has reportedly summoned the Israeli ambassador.
Haaretz said:Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas described as a "massacre" the killing of at least 10 activists on Gaza-bound aid ships boarded by Israeli military forces on Monday.
You anti-celtist scum.
Warrenpoint la la la.
I can trace my Celtic ancestry back to the time of William Wallace. Once again, not a fucking clue.
disgusting what these zionists can get away with.
If this was Mugabe attacking and killing aid workers you wouldn't say he was "controlling" them, would you?Wow. You post that, yet have the gall to accuse the BBC of bias?
The news here (Portugal) is saying that the flotilla had been warned not to approach Gaza, that they had been offered overland routes via Either Israel or Egypt. A 'leader' of the flotilla is saying, in an interview, that the intention was to 'break the blockade' and that 'humanitarian aid was not the objective (of the flotilla)'. She is also saying that she doesn't know if any shots were fired but doesn't know who attacked who. The video broadcast here shows only fighting with no clear indication of who did what or to whom. The Israelis are claiming that they were attacked.
Seems like an act of piracy to me.Even the so called leader of the flotilla is saying that they had been warned for some days not to try to break the illegal blockade, and is saying that the intention was not humanitarian aid but to break the illegal blockade. In these circumstances the outcome was easily foreseeable, and it was foolhardy to ignore the repeated illegal warnings given, which she admitted they had received and chosen to ignore.
I am not saying that this illegal action is right or acceptable, but that it could very easily have been avoided.
You have a warped sense of history.Like being under fire from Gaza you mean?
Save your typing time, the anti-Semitic brigade will not listen. They are not interested in facts, only in having a pop at the Jews on every available occasion.
I also heard the gentleman on the radio. Obviously the phrase ' live fire ' passed you by.
No it's no you vile man. It's an accurate synopsis of what the Israelis told the media. That's it.