Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
i always add the person suggesting such a thing to the priority list for special measures.The phrase “the need for a cull of humans” terrifies me.
i always add the person suggesting such a thing to the priority list for special measures.The phrase “the need for a cull of humans” terrifies me.
No.
The basic biological imperative of any animal is to survive.
Looping back to the original question:
No. And the terms of the question itself indicate a slippery slope to full nazi thinking. The premise that there are "just too many people" nearly always tips straight into picking the sort of people you think the world's best rid of.
You're arbitrarily calling some behaviours 'self destructive' when it suits the argument but leaving many others out. (And what does 'self destructive' even mean, anyway? Suicide? Smoking? Riding motorbikes? )
It's also blindingly illogical even on its own stupid terms: if true, if there is some sort of subconscious response where overcrowded humans get stressed out and destroy themselves, then rates of suicide, murder, whatever, should be highest in the world's most densely populated places. Which they are measurably not.
So: no.
i always add the person suggesting such a thing to the priority list for special measures.
It's like yes, but oppositeIm all ears, G-man
It's like yes, but opposite
It was in reply to the thread title and OP.
Shallow. It's not suicide you should be looking at in this context, but despair. Like many human functions it is helpful right up to the point that it is no longer helpful. A person might exercise obsessively to the point of heart failure, but that kind of occurrence is rare. The drive to perform exercise is generally a healthy one, so it overall benefits the species, even if occasionally it hinders certain individuals.that’s bollocks, otherwise we wouldn’t have suicide.
Shallow. It's not suicide you should be looking at in this context, but despair. Like many human functions it is helpful right up to the point that it is no longer helpful. A person might exercise obsessively to the point of heart failure, but that kind of occurrence is rare. The drive to perform exercise is generally a healthy one, so it overall benefits the species, even if occasionally it hinders certain individuals.
Many aspects of our being are configured such. People have an almost unlimited capacity for despair because mostly that is a beneficial trait. Proportional to the population as a whole suicide is a relative rarity.
Despair (even at the risk of suicide) is a survival mechanism, just like all of our impulses and behaviours.
Shallow. It's not suicide you should be looking at in this context, but despair. Like many human functions it is helpful right up to the point that it is no longer helpful. A person might exercise obsessively to the point of heart failure, but that kind of occurrence is rare. The drive to perform exercise is generally a healthy one, so it overall benefits the species, even if occasionally it hinders certain individuals.
Many aspects of our being are configured such. People have an almost unlimited capacity for despair because mostly that is a beneficial trait. Proportional to the population as a whole suicide is a relative rarity.
Despair (even at the risk of suicide) is a survival mechanism, just like all of our impulses and behaviours.
It's one of the many things, including craft beer, Subbuteo table football, and making silly videos. I'm kind of a renaissance man of sorts.May I ask do you have an academic background in psychology or is it one of many things you’ve become knowledgeable about?
It's one of the many things, including craft beer, Subbuteo table football, and making silly videos. I'm kind of a renaissance man of sorts.