Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Is Elon Musk the greatest visionary or the greatest snake oil salesman of our age?

1xtncvw2d1td1.jpeg
 
musk: this will be “the last election. That’s my prediction.”

Yeah, apartheid Clyde's predictions are always rock-solid.

For example, he claimed:
  • there will be autonomous robotaxis in 2020
  • and automated ''pods'' on the Las Vegas loop
  • in fact Hyperloop, full stop
  • don't forget first humans on his Mars colony in 2024
  • Tesla full self-driving in 2016
    Tesla full self-driving in 2018
    ...in 2019
    ...in 2020
    etc. etc.
  • Tesla able to drive 1,000km on a single charge in 2017 (it's never been anywhere near that figure)
  • Twitter could reach a billion monthly users
  • The new Tesla Roadster will use rocket technology that will allow it to fly
  • SpaceX rockets could soon take passengers from New York to London in 29 minutes, claimed in 2017. Oh, and the "cost per seat should be about the same as full fare economy in an aircraft."
  • he would bring a computer hat to market to help people with brain injuries in about four years. (predicted in 2017)
  • space tourism flight around the moon scheduled for 2018
  • solar tile installations would start in summer of 2017
and so on...
and so on...

He's a fucking charlatan liar.
 
I suppose it was inevitable Musk would endorse Trump, billionaires looking out for each other. And I think Musk did well out of government contracts when Trump was last in power.
 
aaaaaaaaaaaaaand

View attachment 445618


It's not illegal, folks :thumbs:
Apart from anything else, I can't understand how the voter fraud she's advocating is even meant to work. Like, turning up at 10 different polling booths with 10 different names - I can see how someone might imagine that would work, although I imagine ID requirements and the like would make it difficult in practice. But when she says "that's 100 votes", presumably that means she's envisioning people turning up at each polling booth and giving 10 different fake names in a row? What a family.
 
It’s not so straightforward that one candidate will be a goody for them and one will be a baddy. When you’re a billionaire, every candidate will serve your business interests.
Agreed, but usually some will serve better than others.
 
No, but I didn't say that either. I'm saying that billionaires don't endorse politicians because they like them.
Billionaires mostly don’t endorse politicians at all. That’s the point. Musk is endorsing Trump because he’s an alt-right manbaby, not because Trump is somehow going to making him even even even richer.
 
It’s not so straightforward that one candidate will be a goody for them and one will be a baddy. When you’re a billionaire, every candidate will serve your business interests.

One of Trump's campaign arguments in 2016 was that Hillary Clinton would be controlled by all her wealthy hedge fund donors etc. and that wouldn't be an issue for him because he's so rich - in his campaign announcement, he said, "So I’ve watched the politicians. I’ve dealt with them all my life. If you can’t make a good deal with a politician, then there’s something wrong with you. You’re certainly not very good. And that’s what we have representing us. They will never make America great again. They don’t even have a chance. They’re controlled fully— they’re controlled fully by the lobbyists, by the donors, and by the special interests, fully."
 
Billionaires mostly don’t endorse politicians at all. That’s the point. Musk is endorsing Trump because he’s an alt-right manbaby, not because Trump is somehow going to making him even even even richer.
It's a good match for Musk. The whole superclass techno authoritarianism.
 
Not really. You think that a Democrat is going to be anything other than pro-billionaire?
Surely the point is that, while in the crudest terms both parties are pro-billionaire, different factions of capital have different interests and understand those interests in different ways, so that, for instance, the majority of the tech sector has usually tended to lean Democrat while the oil and energy industries have been more pro-Republican. As with the policies of the Tories over the last decade, up to and including Truss.
 
Surely the point is that, while in the crudest terms both parties are pro-billionaire, different factions of capital have different interests and understand those interests in different ways, so that, for instance, the majority of the tech sector has usually tended to lean Democrat while the oil and energy industries have been more pro-Republican. As with the policies of the Tories over the last decade, up to and including Truss.
I think they've more in common with eachother than say, non-billionaires.
 
Back
Top Bottom