Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Is Brexit actually going to happen?

Will we have a brexit?


  • Total voters
    362
If I was being hounded at work every day by right-wing extremists, barely months after one of my colleagues had been stabbed to death by same, I would expect something extra yes.
Oh and on gender, whilst I'm not suggesting this mitigates any threats of sexual violence against her, let's not forget soubry has supported a government that has had a massive impact on dv services.
 
There's no doubt a strong gender element in what soubry is getting and even more so (obviously and entirely) when women MPs have had wave after wave of rape threats and the rest. Gruesome, intimidating, vile. But why start here, why not start with the violence done to sex workers, to migrants, to asylum seekers in detention centres, to victims of dv? Why start with MPs, a group who are supposed to be engaged with the public but already receive significant police and state protection? I'm happy to say I haven't seen these clips in detail, but FFS in at least one she's actually got a copper giving her one to one protection!

Wilf Look at who these right-wingers are targeting in their Facebook videos by accosting them in Parliamant Square - Anna Soubry (woman), Faisal Islam (Muslim), Owen Jones (gay), Kay Burleigh (woman, abused every fucking day of her working life over the last fortnight since they showed up) and Femi Oluwole (a black man).

That's not accidental.

The friendly but passionate flag-waving Remainers who've campaigned in this area for months, who were subsequently joined by equally friendly flag-waving Brexiters, have now been joined by a whole other shower of human shit. This is the far right working, raising funds on Facebook with their provocative videos - and the very real threat that this could prevent women, gay people, Muslims and people of colour from using THEIR democratic right to protest in public should have you thinking harder about your response to this I think.
 
Oh and on gender, whilst I'm not suggesting this mitigates any threats of sexual violence against her, let's not forget soubry has supported a government that has had a massive impact on dv services.

I think by mitigates you might mean justify? Or minimise?

Why mention her impact on dv services if you aren't actually (despite the underline) trying precisely to do that? It's not relevant at all to the discussion, unless you are suggesting she somehow asked for it coz of her CV, which I'm sure you wouldn't.
 
I think by mitigates you might mean justify? Or minimise?

Why mention her impact on dv services if you aren't actually (despite the underline) trying precisely to do that? It's not relevant at all to the discussion, unless you are suggesting she somehow asked for it coz of her CV, which I'm sure you wouldn't.
Couldn't be clearer, that's why I underlined. But if you want to emphasise the threats made to an MP, there's no harm mentioning the damage she has done to women's lives.
 
I'm happy to say I haven't seen these clips in detail!

Well Wilf ...really. You should. There's an undercurrent of violence in the videos these guys are making that goes beyond shouty shouty, and it's co-ordinated to intimidate. They choose Yellow Vests because black shirts are just so 1923...
 
Couldn't be clearer, that's why I underlined. But if you want to emphasise the threats made to an MP, there's no harm mentioning the damage she has done to women's lives.

Yes, COULD be clearer Wilf

It's the word "mitigates" - you're using it wrongly and it's pretty vital to the understanding of your sentence - in fact, it hinges on it, so I provided a couple of alternatives that might be what you meant, they might not. By all means try again with another word, but don't use "mitigates" again, it doesn't work here.
 
Well Wilf ...really. You should. There's an undercurrent of violence in the videos these guys are making that goes beyond shouty shouty, and it's co-ordinated to intimidate. They choose Yellow Vests because black shirts are just so 1923...
But why are we starting with these particular women, this particular gay man, this particular Muslim? Hasn't there been a battle going on for years to get involved in? Well away from Westminster.
 
But why are we starting with these particular women, this particular gay man, this particular Muslim? Hasn't there been a battle going on for years to get involved in? Well away from Westminster.

Because the fact they are doing this to well-known figures, in public and on-camera, and even in front of police officers, would indicate to me a new level of boldness that has me VERY worried. The homophobia, racism and sexism being recorded (for monetary gain to further the right-wing cause) on the steps of our Parliament is not every day hate, it's another level. But it will only ever inevitably filter down to the blacks and the queers and the disableds as it has always done once these right-wing bullies are given licence. Exclusion orders should be made in the morning by the local beak!
 
Because the fact they are doing this to well-known figures, in public and on-camera, and even in front of police officers, would indicate to me a new level of boldness that has me VERY worried. The homophobia, racism and sexism being recorded (for monetary gain to further the right-wing cause) on the steps of our Parliament is not every day hate, it's another level. But it will only ever inevitably filter down to the blacks and the queers and the disableds as it has always done once these right-wing bullies are given licence. Exclusion orders should be made in the morning by the local beak!
So, 'let's protect the MPs so that this kind of thing doesn't start happening to the poor people'? I think that's rather got it the wrong way round!
 
So, 'let's protect the MPs so that this kind of thing doesn't start happening to the poor people'? I think that's rather got it the wrong way round!

It's MPs and journalists, people of influence who represent our civic society. They're being targeted by rightwing former EDL, Britain First and Pegida UK members, and these aggressive numbnuts are breaking the law in doing so. They're shouting the word "traitor" - which is a trope used by the Nazis when they challenged the orthodoxy in their own very special way. I'm surprised you find all this so acceptable. :(

If Owen Jones can get jumped by fascist cunts on the 6 o clock news and no-one gets arrested, what fucking chance have I got?
 
what has kay burley done to upset the fucknuckles? a few months ago she did a thing at our community centre and threats and misogynistic shit got posted on our facebook page - i dont get it.
 
ha ha it was all a hoot on here when farage and Mogg etc were getting abused
Hypocrites
It was just handbags , nothing bad at all.
She should shut up
Move the mob with the EU flags and hats from that area, they provoke it
 
I dunno, you should be able to go to work without trouble. That said it cuts both ways. By which I mean, the HoC and its members are or have become long since the epicentre of craft. They are flailing around and wailing that they can't do what they want any more. No one has confidence in them and that has manifested in the shambles we see before us. In other words, they have increasingly knackered themselves. For instance; very few of them are liked or admired by the broad, ordinary populace. They have brought that on themselves. There is an arrogance and selfish ambition and a lack of quality. Because of a lack of decency, pettiness and onanistic qualities. I don't want to see them heckled by buffoons or otherwise, but it is inevitable. The answer isn't to close ranks, it is to show respect for the office and institution they volunteered for and clear out those dreadful qualities.

Between gallivanting amongst heads of state and losing her party May is supposed to be some kind of leader.
 
...and yet...



With numbers like that, I'd guess it was whipped was it? Which means a collective party response. Hasn't stopped the 'real leader of the opposition/only grown up in the room/national unity govt' appeals to technocratic authority from the usual crowd.
 
With numbers like that, I'd guess it was whipped was it? Which means a collective party response. Hasn't stopped the 'real leader of the opposition/only grown up in the room/national unity govt' appeals to technocratic authority from the usual crowd.
Usual crowd doing what usual crowd does.
 
I can see why Diane Abbot has showed recognition as she has been on the receiving end of endless vitriol, plenty of which was clearly illegal (hate speach, death threats etc). Every incident of that should be investigated and prosecuted and the law upheld. Has it? Ive not heard of any prosecutions. Thats what should be happening - illegal behaviour prosecuted.

Dont think Soubry has had that, and if any of the things said at her were breaking the law then that shoud be prosecuted too. The alledged anal rape with a EU flagpole comment may have likley counted, I dont know, but the heckling reported/caputred on video I've seen is just shit but perfectly legal heckling.

Fuck these BNP cunts doing it, but for the vast majority of it they're not doing anything illegal. And if it's illegal then prosecute accordingly.
What would you like to see happen here Wookey?
 
Last edited:
I can see why Diane Abbot has showed recognition as she has been on the receiving end of endless vitriol, plenty of which was clearly illegal (hate speach, death threats etc). Every incident of that should be investigated and prosecuted and the law upheld. Has it? Ive not heard of any prosecutions. Thats what should be happening - illegal behaviour prosecuted.

Dont think Soubry has had that, and if any of the things said at her were breaking the law then that shoud be prosecuted too. The alledged anal rape with a EU flagpole comment may have likley counted, I dont know, but the heckling reported/caputred on video I've seen is just shit but perfectly legal heckling.

Fuck these BNP cunts doing it, but for the vast majority of it they're not doing anything illegal. And if it's illegal then prosecute accordingly.
What would you like to see happen here Wookey?
that might have been the entire bnp, their numbers have so dwindled.
 
Because the fact they are doing this to well-known figures, in public and on-camera, and even in front of police officers, would indicate to me a new level of boldness that has me VERY worried. The homophobia, racism and sexism being recorded (for monetary gain to further the right-wing cause) on the steps of our Parliament is not every day hate, it's another level. But it will only ever inevitably filter down to the blacks and the queers and the disableds as it has always done once these right-wing bullies are given licence. Exclusion orders should be made in the morning by the local beak!
it's not a new level of boldness. abuse has been hurled at the queen by the movement against the monarchy (eg when she gave out maundy money in bristol) and prince charles (eg when he and camilla were on their first appearance together in public in hoxton) before now, and you've said nothing about it. not to mention mps (norman tebbit by camden stop the poll tax, for example). or is your point that it's the right where in the past they've always been craven whereas people on the left have always been so bold?

it's plain you haven't heard of the league of empire loyalists or you wouldn't come out with such tripe about such things never having been done before by the right.
 
It's MPs and journalists, people of influence who represent our civic society. They're being targeted by rightwing former EDL, Britain First and Pegida UK members, and these aggressive numbnuts are breaking the law in doing so. They're shouting the word "traitor" - which is a trope used by the Nazis when they challenged the orthodoxy in their own very special way. I'm surprised you find all this so acceptable. :(

If Owen Jones can get jumped by fascist cunts on the 6 o clock news and no-one gets arrested, what fucking chance have I got?
The underlined is just peak liberal. If you want to fight the fash, fight the fash (in whatever way you want). But don't do it by joining John Bercow's campaign for extra protection for MPs.

Anyway, john Bercow calling for women to be protected from harassment... :eek:
 
'Government' defeated, again.

Commons division (preceding the re-commencement of the EU withdrawal 'agreement') on today's Dominic Grieve amendment to the Government's timetabling motion. It requires May to return to Parliament within 3 (not 21) sitting days of her losing the 'Agreement' vote to explain what she'll do.

Ayes (for Grieve's amendment) = 308
Noes (against) = 297

This significant defeat will accelerate her demise/response once she's defeated next Tuesday.



...again.
 
'Government' defeated, again.

Commons division (preceding the re-commencement of the EU withdrawal 'agreement') on today's Dominic Grieve amendment to the Government's timetabling motion. It requires May to return to Parliament within 3 (not 21) sitting days of her losing the 'Agreement' vote to explain what she'll do.

Ayes (for Grieve's amendment) = 308
Noes (against) = 297

This significant defeat will accelerate her demise/response once she's defeated next Tuesday..
I should probably avoid all predictions as the situation/process is so chaotic/ridiculous but... she'd die for losing by that margin next week. She'd definitely be in sight of the winning line and with a few tweaks and concessions, close to a majority in the second vote.

Of course that logic goes straight out of the window if she loses big. However I have the feeling a good few tory rebels want to be seen to vote against it the first time only to 'reluctantly vote for the least worst option to save brexit' 3 days later. I also think Corbyn calling a vonc - presumably within the '3 days' - helps May. He'll lose it, which may in turn 'de-embolden' the tory rebels. Anyway, whilst the whole thing is both depressing and dull, it's still nice to see the British political system working so badly. :thumbs:
 
I should probably avoid all predictions as the situation/process is so chaotic/ridiculous but... she'd die for losing by that margin next week. She'd definitely be in sight of the winning line and with a few tweaks and concessions, close to a majority in the second vote.

Of course that logic goes straight out of the window if she loses big. However I have the feeling a good few tory rebels want to be seen to vote against it the first time only to 'reluctantly vote for the least worst option to save brexit' 3 days later. I also think Corbyn calling a vonc - presumably within the '3 days' - helps May. He'll lose it, which may in turn 'de-embolden' the tory rebels. Anyway, whilst the whole thing is both depressing and dull, it's still nice to see the British political system working so badly. :thumbs:
The 20-odd erm headbangers won't vote for it ever, though. They'd rather no brexit at all. So even if May gets her remainer rebels onside and gets the DUP back onside, she still loses if Labour stick together. I still don't see May passing any kind of deal without at least some Labour votes.
 
Another and perhaps better way of putting all that is that even with the 3 day thing, May is still 'in control'. Her strength is that she no longer cares about her party or there being a functioning government after March. Her own psychodrama and lone political objective is to get some form of brexit through, short of the full hard brexit bounce. The 3 day thing jerks her around even further, but that doesn't really matter to her. All she's got is 'must do brexit, must do brexit...'.
 
The 20-odd erm headbangers won't vote for it ever, though. They'd rather no brexit at all. So even if May gets her remainer rebels onside and gets the DUP back onside, she still loses if Labour stick together. I still don't see May passing any kind of deal without at least some Labour votes.
I'll admit I'm pretty much ignoring maths :oops: but I do have a feeling the dup may come onside and also that a few labour and ex labour mps could flake off. There's every chance I'm wrong, particularly if she loses big in the first vote, but I just have a sense it might get into squeaky bum territory, which then puts massive pressure on some of the demi-headbangers.
 
Back
Top Bottom