Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Is Brexit actually going to happen?

Will we have a brexit?


  • Total voters
    362
Vote now set for next Tuesday, 15th January, definitely, and won't be postponed again, for sure, don't even suggest it...

To be fair I think the vote will go ahead this time. Can't see any reason for it not to. What's interesting is the general lack of chat about what will happen when May loses the vote.
 
The stated reason for it being postponed was that it wouldn't pass; I don't think it's any more likely to pass next week than last month, so if it was a valid reason then, it's still more or less valid now.

And I think there has been some speculation from some about what might happen when May loses, but part of her 'strategy' is to portray the while thing as if her deal is literally the only possibility, so such speculation is discouraged.
 
Nah. The EU don't care who the PM is and there won't be any other deal.

No brexit or current deal or no deal...that's it. That's where we are.

Would be nice to know before the very last day though.
A Labour soft Brexit (customs and trade union) would be preferable to the EU over whats on the table and I think they would reopen "negotiations" (a lot less to negotiate tbh) if that became a possibility.
 
This is roughly 1/100th of the daily HGV traffic through the Port of Dover.

View attachment 157978
Pure theatre....we already now how it looks and works because of Stack (4,600 lorries stretched back 30 miles)
_84102440_84102341.jpg
 
Isn't a potential reason for it being pulled again contained in your last sentence? :hmm:


The stated reason for it being postponed was that it wouldn't pass; I don't think it's any more likely to pass next week than last month, so if it was a valid reason then, it's still more or less valid now.

And I think there has been some speculation from some about what might happen when May loses, but part of her 'strategy' is to portray the while thing as if her deal is literally the only possibility, so such speculation is discouraged.

Yeah but I think the vote was always going to be lost - I reckon it was delayed more because people advising May wanted her to lose the vote a bit closer to March than she was going to. Before lots of Tories wanted it delayed, now only May will.
 
The stated reason for it being postponed was that it wouldn't pass; I don't think it's any more likely to pass next week than last month, so if it was a valid reason then, it's still more or less valid now.

And I think there has been some speculation from some about what might happen when May loses, but part of her 'strategy' is to portray the while thing as if her deal is literally the only possibility, so such speculation is discouraged.
As I recall, that was Ed Miliband’s strategy for dealing with the popularity of the SNP. I don’t recall what happened next — he was wildly successful, right?
 
That seems wrong on both points it makes.
The reason there is no more negotiations is based on the fact that there's no way May wants free movement. If she did then there's plenty to talk about.

And the vote of no confidence will happen next week and fail by the sounds of it, so not sure why the author is so excited about that. Sucked into the SNP playbook by the sounds of things.
 
That seems wrong on both points it makes.
The reason there is no more negotiations is based on the fact that there's no way May wants free movement. If she did then there's plenty to talk about.

And the vote of no confidence will happen next week and fail by the sounds of it, so not sure why the author is so excited about that. Sucked into the SNP playbook by the sounds of things.
That 'Wings Over Scotland' site has been discussed at some length on here previously...

Wings Over Scotland
 
That 'Wings Over Scotland' site has been discussed at some length on here previously...

Wings Over Scotland
Why don't you fuck off? That wasn't a discussion that was just the usual shit-throwing from danny who also says the indy movement has a racism problem and then there was his michelle thomson thread as well.

You're the twat that says the woman with cancer who was worried about her medicine was being 'preposterously hyperbolic' two pages ago, aye? Why don't you fuck off to her twitter page and tell her that, come back and tell us what she says?
 
Why don't you fuck off? That wasn't a discussion that was just the usual shit-throwing from danny who also says the indy movement has a racism problem and then there was his michelle thomson thread as well.

You're the twat that says the woman with cancer who was worried about her medicine was being 'preposterously hyperbolic' two pages ago, aye? Why don't you fuck off to her twitter page and tell her that, come back and tell us what she says?

Alright, chill out bawbag.
 
Yeah but I think the vote was always going to be lost - I reckon it was delayed more because people advising May wanted her to lose the vote a bit closer to March than she was going to. Before lots of Tories wanted it delayed, now only May will.
What, from those people's point of view, would be the purpose of losing the vote in Jan 2019 rather than Dec 2018?
 
What, from those people's point of view, would be the purpose of losing the vote in Jan 2019 rather than Dec 2018?

Not enough time to negotiate a new deal or hold a second referendum, so it becomes a choice between no deal or no Brexit.
 
You're the twat that says the woman with cancer who was worried about her medicine was being 'preposterously hyperbolic' two pages ago, aye? Why don't you fuck off to her twitter page and tell her that, come back and tell us what she says?

Because my issue wasn't with her - hyperbolic or not her fears may well be understandable - but with your posting of a response to what as far as I can see was a fake poster/leaflet. The regurgitation of meaningless social media rubbish that just muddles discussion of the real risks of a no-deal Brexit.
 
Not enough time to negotiate a new deal or hold a second referendum, so it becomes a choice between no deal or no Brexit.
So what would the preferred outcome of these 'people advising May' which they think can be better achieved by losing the vote later?

I agree that there is more chance of either no deal or no Brexit, but surely the danger is that they get the option they're least keen on rather than the one they'd prefer.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom