he's familiar with brockLocal or industry insight?
Vote now set for next Tuesday, 15th January, definitely, and won't be postponed again, for sure, don't even suggest it...
To be fair I think the vote will go ahead this time. Can't see any reason for it not to. What's interesting is the general lack of chat about what will happen when May loses the vote.
a debate about which lamppost to string her up fromTo be fair I think the vote will go ahead this time. Can't see any reason for it not to. What's interesting is the general lack of chat about what will happen when May loses the vote.
A Labour soft Brexit (customs and trade union) would be preferable to the EU over whats on the table and I think they would reopen "negotiations" (a lot less to negotiate tbh) if that became a possibility.Nah. The EU don't care who the PM is and there won't be any other deal.
No brexit or current deal or no deal...that's it. That's where we are.
Would be nice to know before the very last day though.
Pure theatre....we already now how it looks and works because of Stack (4,600 lorries stretched back 30 miles)
Isn't a potential reason for it being pulled again contained in your last sentence?
The stated reason for it being postponed was that it wouldn't pass; I don't think it's any more likely to pass next week than last month, so if it was a valid reason then, it's still more or less valid now.
And I think there has been some speculation from some about what might happen when May loses, but part of her 'strategy' is to portray the while thing as if her deal is literally the only possibility, so such speculation is discouraged.
Have a read of this.A Labour soft Brexit (customs and trade union) would be preferable to the EU over whats on the table and I think they would reopen "negotiations" (a lot less to negotiate tbh) if that became a possibility.
As I recall, that was Ed Miliband’s strategy for dealing with the popularity of the SNP. I don’t recall what happened next — he was wildly successful, right?The stated reason for it being postponed was that it wouldn't pass; I don't think it's any more likely to pass next week than last month, so if it was a valid reason then, it's still more or less valid now.
And I think there has been some speculation from some about what might happen when May loses, but part of her 'strategy' is to portray the while thing as if her deal is literally the only possibility, so such speculation is discouraged.
That seems wrong on both points it makes.
That 'Wings Over Scotland' site has been discussed at some length on here previously...That seems wrong on both points it makes.
The reason there is no more negotiations is based on the fact that there's no way May wants free movement. If she did then there's plenty to talk about.
And the vote of no confidence will happen next week and fail by the sounds of it, so not sure why the author is so excited about that. Sucked into the SNP playbook by the sounds of things.
Why don't you fuck off? That wasn't a discussion that was just the usual shit-throwing from danny who also says the indy movement has a racism problem and then there was his michelle thomson thread as well.That 'Wings Over Scotland' site has been discussed at some length on here previously...
Wings Over Scotland
Why don't you fuck off? That wasn't a discussion that was just the usual shit-throwing from danny who also says the indy movement has a racism problem and then there was his michelle thomson thread as well.
You're the twat that says the woman with cancer who was worried about her medicine was being 'preposterously hyperbolic' two pages ago, aye? Why don't you fuck off to her twitter page and tell her that, come back and tell us what she says?
Does he need your help?Alright, chill out bawbag.
Does he need your help?
What, from those people's point of view, would be the purpose of losing the vote in Jan 2019 rather than Dec 2018?Yeah but I think the vote was always going to be lost - I reckon it was delayed more because people advising May wanted her to lose the vote a bit closer to March than she was going to. Before lots of Tories wanted it delayed, now only May will.
the aftermath won't ruin christmasWhat, from those people's point of view, would be the purpose of losing the vote in Jan 2019 rather than Dec 2018?
Crowd on BBC news channel chanting 'soubry is a nazi'. Getting a bit lively!
the forum rules explicitly state teuchter should never be assistedI thought you did
What, from those people's point of view, would be the purpose of losing the vote in Jan 2019 rather than Dec 2018?
yeh, so this time next year it's entirely possible we will still be in the eu without the doubtful pleasure of a second referendumNot enough time to negotiate a new deal or hold a second referendum, so it becomes a choice between no deal or no Brexit.
Simon McCoy was interviewing her outside parliament and a crowd kicked off chanting it.Just tried to find this on BBC site (also subsearched site for 'Soubry') and I'm not suceeding ... what's that all about then?
yeh, so this time next year it's entirely possible we will still be in the eu without the doubtful pleasure of a second referendum
You're the twat that says the woman with cancer who was worried about her medicine was being 'preposterously hyperbolic' two pages ago, aye? Why don't you fuck off to her twitter page and tell her that, come back and tell us what she says?
So what would the preferred outcome of these 'people advising May' which they think can be better achieved by losing the vote later?Not enough time to negotiate a new deal or hold a second referendum, so it becomes a choice between no deal or no Brexit.