No, what happened is that leftist gangs hijacked peaceful BLM protests and vandalized and looted a large portion of downtown.
Strange kind of hijackingThe BLM actavists in Portland are a disgrace. Very few denounced the rioters.
No, what happened is that leftist gangs hijacked peaceful BLM protests and vandalized and looted a large portion of downtown.
Strange kind of hijackingThe BLM actavists in Portland are a disgrace. Very few denounced the rioters.
FFSI'd never heard of this guy but if he added right wing gangs such as the proud boys and patriot prayer, he'd have a point. Extreme left, extreme right.....mirror images of each other.
Oh, but you do love a label, don't you?Portland is an "anarchist jurisdiction" (for lack of a better term) unfortunately. I hate to agree with Barr on anything but I have seen who trashed the city I live in. It wasn't right wing gangs, it wasn't cops, it wasn't capitalist elites. It was left wing extremists and wimp liberal politicians who stood idly by and let it happen.
I missed this the first time. Why are you using Trump language to describe cities? "Anarchist jurisdiction" is straight out of his playbook. This is looking rather more scummy than accidental, and you clearly lack the honesty to admit up front that you are, essentially, peddling the Trumpist narrative. That's not classy.Portland is an "anarchist jurisdiction" (for lack of a better term) unfortunately. I hate to agree with Barr on anything but I have seen who trashed the city I live in. It wasn't right wing gangs, it wasn't cops, it wasn't capitalist elites. It was left wing extremists and wimp liberal politicians who stood idly by and let it happen.
In this case the Trump language accurately describes Portland IMO and it's political leadership. The mayor, city council, county prosecutor, and governor did nothing to control the violence. By neglecting to act they allowed the downtown area as well as other areas to be trashed. They and the rioters handed Trump a campaign issue. He uses it constantly. I don't refrain from expressing opinions to avoid them coinciding with those of Trump no matter how much I detest him.I missed this the first time. Why are you using Trump language to describe cities? "Anarchist jurisdiction" is straight out of his playbook. This is looking rather more scummy than accidental, and you clearly lack the honesty to admit up front that you are, essentially, peddling the Trumpist narrative. That's not classy.
In this case the Trump language accurately describes Portland IMO and it's political leadership. The mayor, city council, county prosecutor, and governor did nothing to control the violence. By neglecting to act they allowed the downtown area as well as other areas to be trashed. They and the rioters handed Trump a campaign issue. He uses it constantly. I don't refrain from expressing opinions to avoid them coinciding with those of Trump no matter how much I detest him.
We are NOT anti-government. In fact, we are very pro-government, so long as the government abides by the Constitution, doesn't overstep its bounds, and remains “for the people and by the people”. Our goal is to utilize the failsafes put in place by our founders to rein in an overreaching government and push back against tyranny. We are working to preserve the intent of our government as designed. We do not intend to implement our own government. There is often a misconception that we are wanting to overthrow the government. This is simply not true and a false rumor to try and paint our movement as anti-government.
We do not seek to incite a revolution. However, we will defend ourselves when necessary. We are not here to create violence. Violence should always be a last resort and even then should only be defensive in nature
3 PRINCIPLES OF THE THREE PERCENTERS
All Three Percenters must abide by the following principles. Anyone who cannot accept these principles as a self-imposed discipline are not welcome in this organization, nor should ever consider themselves a part of the Three Percent movement.
1. Moral Strength - Knowing what is right and wrong and acting accordingly. Being trustworthy, truthful, and holding high values and principles. Strength to stand up when something is morally wrong.
2. Physical Readiness - Physical readiness is defined as the ability to meet the physical demands of any task in order to accomplish the objective at hand. There are some III%ers that have disabilities that prevent them from meeting physical demands and for these there is an exception.
3. No First Use of Force - "Don't fire unless fired upon". We are not the aggressor nor antagonist. We are purely defensive and only as a last resort.
from their website
In this case the Trump language accurately describes Portland IMO and it's political leadership. The mayor, city council, county prosecutor, and governor did nothing to control the violence. By neglecting to act they allowed the downtown area as well as other areas to be trashed. They and the rioters handed Trump a campaign issue. He uses it constantly. I don't refrain from expressing opinions to avoid them coinciding with those of Trump no matter how much I detest him.
Wanton fucking endangerment. ZERO justice.As expected, the cops got off & now the inevitable is playing out
Two officers shot during Breonna Taylor protests
As expected, the cops got off & now the inevitable is playing out
Two officers shot during Breonna Taylor protests
If you find your opinions coincide with those of djt (or dlt for that matter) something is wrong with your thinkingIn this case the Trump language accurately describes Portland IMO and it's political leadership. The mayor, city council, county prosecutor, and governor did nothing to control the violence. By neglecting to act they allowed the downtown area as well as other areas to be trashed. They and the rioters handed Trump a campaign issue. He uses it constantly. I don't refrain from expressing opinions to avoid them coinciding with those of Trump no matter how much I detest him.
Three cops shoot at an unarmed Black woman and only the one who missed gets charged.
Not necessarily. Even the most dangerous and obnoxious politicians can be agreed with on certain issues by reasonble opponents. To reflexively oppose everything the Trump side says is not thinking logically. I's reacting ideologically. I genuinely think the political leadership of my city, county and state were and are wimpy and incompetent in dealing with the violence. They knuckled under to mob/gang rule. This negligence resulted in pointless destruction and made the economic comeback of downtown much more difficult. All that translates into far higher unemployment than would have otherwise been the case.If you find your opinions coincide with those of djt (or dlt for that matter) something is wrong with your thinking
Not necessarily. Even the most dangerous and obnoxious politicians can be agreed with on certain issues by reasonble opponents. To reflexively oppose everything the Trump side says is not thinking logically. I's reacting ideologically. I genuinely think the political leadership of my city, county and state were and are wimpy and incompetent in dealing with the violence. They knuckled under to mob/gang rule. This negligence resulted in pointless destruction and made the economic comeback of downtown much more difficult. All that translates into far higher unemployment than would have otherwise been the case.
Gotta nail those "Antifa" good and properTeargassing not enough for you?
Our wimp mayor has forbidden the cops to use teargas. Just another example of his wimpishness.Teargassing not enough for you?
Yes, I expect you would like a "tough" mayor. One who cracks down on people and things you don't like. You know, really cracks down. Because, after all, the end always justifies the means.Our wimp mayor has forbidden the cops to use teargas. Just another example of his wimpishness.