Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Is America burning? (Black Lives Matter protests, civil unrest and riots 2020)

Not good.

View attachment 228907

and from the tweet just underneath this we find more info about the law firm:

There was no way it isn't going to be one of the most contentious trials in American history. In my view, staying on scene and informing other protesters of the first aid aspects of his role, when he had already gunned down one protester, was incendiary. If I was an Illinois' juror (for it is they alone whom decide) I would want to know whom he called on his mobile. The world will be watching, of that I have no doubt, but that is all we will be doing. It may also be of note that Militia Acts of 1792 would not have allowed for the involvement of 17 year olds. The 'gentleman' whom organised said Kenosha Guard, that considered himself capable of 'setting the bounds'should, I would have thought, also face some mechanism of accountability.
 
There was no way it isn't going to be one of the most contentious trials in American history. In my view, staying on scene and informing other protesters of the first aid aspects of his role, when he had already gunned down one protester, was incendiary. If I was an Illinois' juror (for it is they alone whom decide) I would want to know whom he called on his mobile. The world will be watching, of that I have no doubt, but that is all we will be doing. It may also be of note that Militia Acts of 1792 would not have allowed for the involvement of 17 year olds. The 'gentleman' whom organised said Kenosha Guard, that considered himself capable of 'setting the bounds'should, I would have thought, also face some mechanism of accountability.

TBF I'd be amazed if that wasnt a 911 call, given what he had done and his apparent fascination with cops.
 
MLK Jr and Fred Hampton (and a lot of others but they're particularly relevant here?) would disagree that racism and the political economy can be addressed separately
Don't disagree with that at all (in fact, MLK was absolutely an economic radical) - I just didn't want the thread to get derailed
 
Don't disagree with that at all (in fact, MLK was absolutely an economic radical) - I just didn't want the thread to get derailed
I don't think it's such a derail. Discussion about what BLM means to those protesting, and what it can then be taken to mean by those seeking to coopt the cause (sports organisations, corporations, political parties, etc), inevitably has to include exactly how you address the structural roots of racism. The process by which attempts are made to steal BLM from those who started it so that it can be sold back to them in a neutered form has already begun. And that that can happen at many different levels - from the cynical corporations seeking to monetise the situation to the individual police chief, who is well-meaning enough in his expression of solidarity, but who perhaps unintentionally ends up taking over and dictating terms. We've seen it here with Keir Starmer presuming to lecture people about what BLM means.
 
Do you have a source for that last bit? I'd like to know more.
The study was widely reported at the time. A google search is difficult because you get a lot of unhelpful stuff nothing to do with the subject, but for example:



And clearly related but with a different spin:

 
The world will be watching, of that I have no doubt, but that is all we will be doing. It may also be of note that Militia Acts of 1792 would not have allowed for the involvement of 17 year olds.

Something that also hasn't been explained as far as I can see is how the fuck did a 17 year old have an AR? I think in some states you are allowed rifles and shotguns but surely not ARs? He should have been nicked from the moment he turned up and everyone in the militia who knew he was there should be charged as an accesory.

But he won't because America is fucking bonkers.
 
hmm am i missing or something but the whole self defense angle is that he was being attacked by a mob and thats what the view supposedly shows


but i'm i wrong or was the video not started after he had already killed one protester?
and people charged him down because of this?

and then he killed another and shot someone in the arm?
But the 1st person he shot was saying mean things about him so totally self defence :facepalm:
 
A step in the right direction?


O'Malley cited the state legal standard that became effective January 1, noting its "intent is that peace officers use deadly force only when necessary in defense of human life.

The legislature declared officers shall use other available resources and techniques if reasonably safe and feasible to an objectively reasonable officer."

Basic background, covered in link, is that that Steven Taylor, 33, threatened the officer with a baseball bat that he was trying to steal.
 
Meanwhile, what's going on here? And what does he hope to replace training with?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/09/04/white-house-racial-sensitivity-training/

President Trump is moving to revamp federal agencies’ racial sensitivity trainings, casting some of them as “divisive” and “un-American,” according to a memo by the White House Office of Management and Budget.

In the two-page memo, OMB Director Russell Vought says Trump has asked him to prevent federal agencies from spending millions in taxpayer dollars on these training sessions. Vought says OMB will instruct federal agencies to come up with a list of all contracts related to training sessions involving “white privilege” or “critical race theory,” and do everything possible within the law to cancel those contracts, the memo states.
 
No. What struck me was the courage of the woman who refused to be bullied into raising her fist. This demand for absolute conformity of thought is totalitarian.

do you stand for your national anthem?


just sorta wondering

also wondering if you had to did the pledge of allegiance in School

:hmm:
 
do you stand for your national anthem?


just sorta wondering

also wondering if you had to did the pledge of allegiance in School

:hmm:
I haven't had an occasion to stand for the national anthem recently. I recited the pledge of allegiance in school and didn't like it. I'd like to turn back the clock and refuse.
 
you know your country is quite jingoistic, and the way it expresses itself along these lines

but you here now complaining about people trying to use a symbol as a sign of support in protest over how your legal system discriminates against a portion of your population

most of your complaints seem to come from issues with the property damage

and you are claiming totalitarian behaviour,

from the protesters


are you fucking high?
 
you know your country is quite jingoistic, and the way it expresses itself along these lines

but you here now complaining about people trying to use a symbol as a sign of support in protest over how your legal system discriminates against a portion of your population

most of your complaints seem to come from issues with the property damage

and you are claiming totalitarian behaviour,

from the protesters


are you fucking high?
Last night in my city a gang of rioters attempted to attack a police station and threw Molotov cocktails at the cops. I fail to see how this behavior helps black people in any way. Do you think this violence advances the cause of civil rights? And the property damage I've discussed destroys the work places of ordinary people. Causing unemployment is another strange way to help black people.
Police blocked hundreds of demonstrators from marching to a Southeast Portland police precinct Saturday night, then quickly declared the gathering a riot after people threw at least three incendiary devices toward officers.
 
Back
Top Bottom