Is this the same bullshitter?apparently most scots down here are going to lie and say they're voting no because they might get their lights punched out if they were somewhere like Essex or London. never mind that they can't vote if theyre down here
Over the edge? The edge of a 40%+ lead?I've got a mate who thinks there might be a backlash including a boycott. That would be pretty funny if anything. Such a backlash might tip the UKIP vote over the edge in Clacton though, especially if the tories go into a bit of a meltdown.
Is this the same bullshitter?
I've never thought of anywhere as a 'foreign' country. The whole concept of 'foreign' is foreign to me. I think most people find that they have most things in common with most other people wherever they go. Scotland won't become any more 'foreign' to me when it is independent.
apparently most scots down here are going to lie and say they're voting no because they might get their lights punched out if they were somewhere like Essex or London. never mind that they can't vote if theyre down here
pretty minor barriers. Yes, there'll be some mucking about with passport, currency and timezone at the border, but this is 2014, most people have got used to all that and treat it as a trivial inconvenience. And some sort of 'welcome to mcvodofone' roaming irritation, and trying to remember travel insurance, either of which could get expensive if not properly managed, but that's just like anywhere else abroad. Apart from that the barriers are inconsequential surely, they'll still speak the same language, drive on the left, eat chips and so on.Nicely put, but separation WILL create barriers between likeminded people that weren't there before. To me that is a shame.
Nicely put, but separation WILL create barriers between likeminded people that weren't there before. To me that is a shame.
Surprised this hasn't been discussed much but the only real thing that would worry me about Scottish independence (and I hope they vote yes btw) is the whole "balkanisation" of the UK and descent into nationalism and regionalism, although this would probably be even more likely with a narrow no vote.
I don't think so. A narrow 'no', if it leads to more devolution, may not be divisive.Surprised this hasn't been discussed much but the only real thing that would worry me about Scottish independence (and I hope they vote yes btw) is the whole "balkanisation" of the UK and descent into nationalism and regionalism, although this would probably be even more likely with a narrow no vote.
We can't balkanise with 3 established countries with no internal linguistic ethnic or religious territories. With no border-redrawing supported with no claims on areas within other existing or for historical states. Nothing. There is no dynamic or history or facts on the ground here that supports such a scenario.Surprised this hasn't been discussed much but the only real thing that would worry me about Scottish independence (and I hope they vote yes btw) is the whole "balkanisation" of the UK and descent into nationalism and regionalism, although this would probably be even more likely with a narrow no vote.
Surprised this hasn't been discussed much but the only real thing that would worry me about Scottish independence (and I hope they vote yes btw) is the whole "balkanisation" of the UK and descent into nationalism and regionalism, although this would probably be even more likely with a narrow no vote.
Surprised this hasn't been discussed much but the only real thing that would worry me about Scottish independence (and I hope they vote yes btw) is the whole "balkanisation" of the UK and descent into nationalism and regionalism, although this would probably be even more likely with a narrow no vote.
The price of entry is austerity. Legally bound to it. It well also speed potential UK/whatever exit. Which the EU is desperate to avoid. If anyone is going under the bus it's scotland.I reckon the EU will welcome Scotland and probably take them in on more favourable terms than the remaining UK (in terms of the amount they pay in) just to fuck off the uppity bastards in London that won't play along with all their 'superstate' games. It'll add to the isolation of the Eurosceptics, although that's no longer just a British phenomenon.
As much as there might be some political/economic spite directed north of the border in the event of the split, there's an equal likelihood of support and solidarity from the likes of Ireland and maybe some of the Scandinavian states.
We can't balkanise with 3 established countries with no internal linguistic ethnic or religious territories. With no border-redrawing supported with no claims on areas within other existing or for historical states. Nothing. There is no dynamic or history or facts on the ground here that supports such a scenario.
When you say that it should be i take it that you're not referring to the large amount of rather more informed and experienced legal opinion than you that says, well it might not be?On the EU front, it should be fairly clear that seceding from an EU member state means exiting the EU.
There is no legal precedent for a constituent part of a member state seceding, thereby exiting the EU, and then applying for membership.
I'm surprised the "no" camp haven't made more of this, although I suppose it is one of those numerous slightly complicated policy points that is difficult to get across succintly and directly.
To put it simply - a "yes" vote is a "yes" for leaving both (i) the UK and (ii) the EU.
Nicely put, but separation WILL create barriers between likeminded people that weren't there before. To me that is a shame.
A lot in the No camp don't want to be in Europe so would struggle to use that as an argument.On the EU front, it should be fairly clear that seceding from an EU member state means exiting the EU.
There is no legal precedent for a constituent part of a member state seceding, thereby exiting the EU, and then applying for membership.
I'm surprised the "no" camp haven't made more of this, although I suppose it is one of those numerous slightly complicated policy points that is difficult to get across succintly and directly.
To put it simply - a "yes" vote is a "yes" for leaving both (i) the UK and (ii) the EU.
Not a chance they'd get thge same membership as UK immediately. Can you see the Eastern European newbies agreeing when they had to meet loads of new criteria but the Scots wouldn't? It'll be blocked, no chance of it being agreed by the agreed date for seperation. That said, Scotland would get, wotchamacallit, the favoured nation status, like the Swedes have, which would be more than good enough for them.I'd expect to see scotland apply for and get membership under the same terms as the former UK. On the big thread this was discussed at length including contrasting quotes from EU legalish types