Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Humans: Smarter than yeast?

Humans:


  • Total voters
    18

Dr Jon

so many beers, too little time
Banned
I had an interesting discussion with a colleague the other day about the triggers of the current financial crisis. We concluded that the perceived value of (everything in) the global economy had become inflated because of the perception that business as usual would carry on indefinitely. As Colin Campbell has noted, business and the stock markets had assumed the continued supply of cheap energy, on which the capitalist economy depends. The assumption of continued supply is mirrored for almost every other resource we use and our consumption of these has risen exponentially.

Those of you who are into home brewing may see an interesting parallel here: yeast consumes "natural resources" (sugar) and reproduces until all those resources have been used up. That and / or the toxic waste it produces (alcohol) kills it off.

If you allow for the difference in scale, scope and complexity - that we are much more complex organisms and therefore capable of more complex achievements on a larger scale, our life-cycles are strikingly similar.

Which raises an interesting question: are humans smarter than yeast?
:eek:
 
I think that on the individual, local scale, of course we are smarter than yeast. On the mass, global scale however we behave in the same way. It remains to be seen whether we are actually smart enough to change our behaviour in time to allow our survival.
 
Well humans have built things like the pyramids, the interent and put people on the moon.

However being able to turn sugar in alchohol is a pretty neat trick too.
 
Some humans are smarter than yeast. However, the majority really aren't. But coparing humans to yeast isn't really a like-for-like comparison. Yeast perform a beautiful and important function in nature, whereas scientists have yet to find what the point of humans actually is.
 
Some humans are smarter than yeast. However, the majority really aren't. But coparing humans to yeast isn't really a like-for-like comparison. Yeast perform a beautiful and important function in nature, whereas scientists have yet to find what the point of humans actually is.
Turning beer into piss = fertiliser!
:D

ETA:
Just off to the pub to justify my existence...
 
My tagline used to be, 'Life is a giant microcosm'.

Dr Jon's example was just the sort of thing I had in mind.......
 
I just misread the title as "Humous: smarter than yeast?" and thought is was some kind of health-food thread :oops:
I think this proves that this particular human is no smarter than yeast :D
 
Those of you who are into home brewing may see an interesting parallel here: yeast consumes "natural resources" (sugar) and reproduces until all those resources have been used up. That and / or the toxic waste it produces (alcohol) kills it off.

Human's at least have the potential to recognise and overcome limits -- yeast doesn't. The fact that most human's, especially after ingesting yeast' 'toxic output', don't bother to imagine the impact of their actions, does not deny the fact that they sttill have the potential to do so. no matter how clever yeast gets it will never have this ability [cue deranged scientist producing genetically-altered uber-yeast].
 
I had an interesting discussion with a colleague the other day about the triggers of the current financial crisis. We concluded that the perceived value of (everything in) the global economy had become inflated because of the perception that business as usual would carry on indefinitely. As Colin Campbell has noted, business and the stock markets had assumed the continued supply of cheap energy, on which the capitalist economy depends. The assumption of continued supply is mirrored for almost every other resource we use and our consumption of these has risen exponentially.

Those of you who are into home brewing may see an interesting parallel here: yeast consumes "natural resources" (sugar) and reproduces until all those resources have been used up. That and / or the toxic waste it produces (alcohol) kills it off.

If you allow for the difference in scale, scope and complexity - that we are much more complex organisms and therefore capable of more complex achievements on a larger scale, our life-cycles are strikingly similar.

Which raises an interesting question: are humans smarter than yeast?
:eek:

In large groups, or as a species we're about as smart as yeast and other simple organisms. As individuals we can do things that yeast can't, like oragami, and blogging.
 
It is very judgmental to guage humans in yeast terms and yeast in human terms. Yeast has its own culture, you know.
 
Back
Top Bottom